2012 Cadillac Cts Base on 2040-cars
1200 IN-44, Shelbyville, Indiana, United States
Engine:3.0L V6 24V GDI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1G6DC5E53C0145938
Stock Num: 14718
Make: Cadillac
Model: CTS Base
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 32026
This 2012 Cadillac CTS Sedan has features that include tear-resistant Leather Seats, an Auxiliary Audio Input, and a Premium Sound System to enhance your music. It also has a Heated Front Windshield, Multi-Zone Climate Control, and Child Locks. As well as Automatic Climate Control, a whole new world of mobile entertainment turned on with Satellite Radio, and an Auxiliary Power Outlet. It also has an MP3 Player / Dock, Keyless Entry, and an Anti-Theft System. This vehicle also includes: Side Curtain Air Bag - Steering Wheel Audio - Traction Control - Heated Mirror(s) - Steering Wheel Controls - Tire Pressure Monitoring System - Bucket Seats - Cruise Control - Power Seat - Power Windows - Rear Head Air Bag - Disc Brakes - Air Conditioning - Power Locks - Power Mirrors - CD Single-Disc Player - Auto Dimming R/V Mirror - Auto Headlamp - Leather Wrapped Steering Wheel - Center Console - Airbag On/Off Switch - Adjustable Head Rests - Daytime Running Lights - Fog Lights - Rear Window Defrost - Remote Trunk Release - Tilt Wheel - Vanity Mirrors - Trip Odometer - Digital Clock - Center Arm Rest - Beverage Holder(s) For more photos and info on this vehicle visit our website http://www.acraauto.com >>> 4 LOCATIONS - PLEASE CALL 888-306-0471 FOR VEHICLE AVAILABILITY <<<
Cadillac CTS for Sale
- 2014 cadillac cts 3.6l luxury(US $58,757.00)
- 2014 cadillac cts 2.0l turbo luxury(US $55,201.00)
- 2007 cadillac cts sport(US $17,995.00)
- 2011 cadillac cts luxury(US $30,995.00)
- 2014 cadillac cts vsport rwd(US $56,795.00)
- 2014 cadillac cts performance(US $51,465.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
West Creek Motor Sports Tire`s ★★★★★
USA Collision of Price Hill ★★★★★
Tire Service Plus ★★★★★
Rob`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
R C Foster Truck Sales ★★★★★
Pro Gear Machine ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM may kill 6 car models as it works with UAW to tackle sales slump
Fri, Jul 21 2017The president of the United Auto Workers union said on Thursday the union is talking with General Motors about the potential threat to plants and jobs from slumping U.S. car sales. GM's response will be more trucks and SUVs, and sources say at least six slow-selling car models may be killed off. "We are talking to (GM) right now about the products that they currently have" at underused car plants such as Hamtramck in Michigan and Lordstown in Ohio, and whether they might be replaced with newer, more popular vehicles such as crossovers, Dennis Williams told reporters. "We are tracking it (and) we are addressing it," Williams added. GM has cut shifts at several U.S. plants this year as inventories of unsold cars have ballooned. Industry analysts said more jobs could be at risk as the automaker wrestles with permanently shrinking production of small and midsized sedans. GM is reviewing whether to cancel at least six passenger cars in the U.S. market after 2020, including the Chevrolet Volt hybrid, which could be replaced in 2022 with a new gasoline-electric crossover model, Reuters has learned from people familiar with the plans. Other GM cars at risk include the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala and Chevrolet Sonic, sources said. Some analysts have singled out GM's Hamtramck plant in Detroit as one of the most vulnerable because of plummeting car sales. The plant, which opened in 1985, builds four slow-selling models: Buick LaCrosse, Chevrolet Impala, Cadillac CT6 and Chevrolet Volt. In the first half, it built fewer than 35,000 cars, down 32 percent from the same period in 2016, according to suppliers familiar with GM's U.S. production schedule. The typical GM assembly plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year.COMING ATTRACTIONS: TRUCKS AND SUVS GM must "create some innovative new products" to replace slow-selling sedans "or start closing plants," said Sam Fiorani, vice president of AutoForecast Solutions. The auto maker already has begun to shift future production plans from cars to trucks, according to Morgan Stanley auto analyst John Murphy. He estimates that fewer than 10 percent of the new vehicle models that GM will introduce over the next four years will be passenger cars, with the rest divided among trucks, SUVs and crossovers. GM plans to add production of the new Cadillac XT4 crossover next year to its Malibu sedan plant in Fairfax, Kansas.
Autoblog Podcast #399
Tue, Sep 30 2014Episode #398 of the Autoblog Podcast is here, and this week, Dan Roth, Brandon Turkus, and Rob Sass of Hagerty Classic Cars Magazine talk about Cadillac's move to Manhattan and new naming convention, preview the Paris Motor Show, and finish up with the 3 Guys, 3 Grand Classic Car challenge. Also included is an interview with Tom Tjaarda, prolific designer of vehicles including the DeTomaso Pantera. We start with what's in the garage and finish up with some of your questions, and for those of you who hung with us live on our UStream channel, thanks for taking the time. Check out the rundown below with times for topics, and you can follow along down below with our Q&A. Thanks for listening! Autoblog Podcast #399: The video meant to be presented here is no longer available. Sorry for the inconvenience. Topics: Cadillac relocates to NYC and changes its model names Paris Motor Show preview Tom Tjaarda interview $3,000 classic cars In The Autoblog Garage: 2015 BMW 428i Gran Coupe 2014 Subaru XV Crosstrek Hybrid Jensen Interceptor Hosts: Dan Roth, Michael Harley, Brandon Turkus Runtime: 01:47:56 Rundown: Intro and Garage - 00:00 Cadillac Move - 24:02 Paris Motor Show - 39:22 Tom Tjaarda - 52:12 Hagerty $3000 Classics - 01:15:43 Q&A - 01:27:45 Get the podcast: [UStream] Listen live on Mondays at 10 PM Eastern at UStream [iTunes] Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes [RSS] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator [MP3] Download the MP3 directly Feedback: Email: Podcast at Autoblog dot com Review the show in iTunes Podcasts Paris Motor Show BMW Cadillac Subaru Classics cadillac ct6 rob sass cadillac lts
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.