Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2017 Cadillac Xt5 on 2040-cars

US $13,950.00
Year:2017 Mileage:162744 Color: [GMU] Bronze Dune Metallic /
 Black
Location:

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Vehicle Title:Clean
Engine:6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Body Type:SUV
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Dealer
Year: 2017
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GYKNARS6HZ174399
Mileage: 162744
Make: Cadillac
Features: --
Power Options: --
Exterior Color: [GMU] Bronze Dune Metallic
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: XT5
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions

Auto Services in Arizona

Windshield Replacement & Auto Glass Repair Glendale ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Broken
Address: 4818 W Sandra Terrace, Glendale-Luke-Afb
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Williamson Automotive Mobile Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Saddlebrooke
Phone: (520) 312-2208

Toy Box Fine Motor Cars ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2121 E Indian School Rd, Guadalupe
Phone: (602) 224-0228

TintAZ.com Mobile Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting
Address: Kearny
Phone: (480) 244-8468

Terrell Battery Corp. ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 802 S 19th Ave, Tempe
Phone: (480) 424-4938

Suntec Auto Glass & Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Window Tinting
Address: Palo-Verde
Phone: (602) 753-6050

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Cadillac to vie for Secret Service armored car contract, new Beast?

Wed, 03 Jul 2013

President Obama has used the same armored limo since his inauguration in 2008. Known by many as The Beast, the Presidential Limo was provided by Cadillac and earned its nickname in large part because of its massive size, which isn't surprising considering that its Caddy-shaped bodywork is said to sit atop a heavy-duty truck chassis.
It seems the Secret Service may be in the market for a Beast replacement, having issued a request for proposals for a new armored limo. According to Motor Trend, Obama's backup limo is a leftover from the Bush Administration, so it will be interesting to see if this new machine will serve as a replacement for The Beast or for its backup. The contract is to be awarded by September 29, 2013.
The boys from MT contacted Cadillac, Lincoln and Chrysler, and Chrysler is the only one that would confirm that it is not pursuing the contract. Cadillac may have the inside track, as it has provided Presidential limos since 1993, but Lincoln also has a long and storied history of chauffeuring the President.

Playboy reveals its 2013 Cars of the Year

Thu, 20 Dec 2012

Vaunted men's magazine Playboy knows that its readers are nearly as interested in cars as they are in the female anatomy... sorry, we thought we could write that with a straight face. Anyway, the buff-book does occasionally fill some of its spreads with sexy metal, to accent all the rest of the sexiness.
To wit, the magazine has unveiled its feature on the 2013 Cars of the Year. Without giving us much in the way of criteria for the awards, nor a clear framing of the categories ("Responsible Ride" is a particularly challenging concept, especially when you consider that the Mazdaspeed3 was the winner), Playboy has nevertheless highlighted what we assume to be it's favorite 12 or 13 (depending on how you count) cars from the 2013 model year.
Headlining the class is the Porsche 911, which Playboy writers single out for having "remarkable electronic voodoo." BMW M5 is named "Slickest Sports Sedan" though the Cadillac ATS then follows on because "we couldn't resist giving the new Caddy a shout-out." The rest of the picks are pretty conventional (save, perhaps, the Honda Fit EV as "Ace Electric"), even if the categories and methodology are fairly wonky. Cruise through or gallery for a taste or check out the full list, here. The site is safe for work, and you can legitimately (this time) say that you were reading it for the articles.