1992 Buick Roadmaster Limited Sedan 4-door 5.7l on 2040-cars
Sterling, Colorado, United States
This vehicle has been owned by two families. We purchased it from the original owner when she could no longer drive. The car began life as the around-town car of an elderly lady. With us, it was first a vehicle for a regional sales position, then a daily commuter for approximately 100 miles per day, then a weekly commuter for a college student, about 300 miles per week. Eventually she retired to "backup car" status, and has had fewer trips of late.
She runs beautifully still, and has nearly-new tires. The vehicle retains much of the original equipment - in fact it still has all 4 factory floor mats, and the original owners manual. She needs a bit of a tune up, as she is presently running in the 17-20 MPG range but has been known to get closer to 22-26. In addition to new tires, the vehicle comes with a full spare, as well as all of the original trunk equipment. One of the few features not presently working on the vehicle is the instrument cluster, particularly speedometer, which controls cruise and mileage. The mileage on the odometer is not accurate. The original 5.7 Liter Engine was completely rebuilt, top to bottom, in 2010 or 2011. We have all the paperwork on this rebuild, and the actual mileage on the rebuilt motor is in the 40-60k range, mostly interstate commute. The car has been regularly maintained, and is in good working order. My daughter is having difficulty with the RW drive aspect of the vehicle, and with a Corvette Engine, the Road master is no longer a viable backup with a young driver in the house. We are downgrading to something with a little less power and Front Wheel Drive. I can't tell you how much I will miss this car. |
Buick Roadmaster for Sale
- Buick skylark road master anniversary convertible frame off resto,stunning cond.(US $159,000.00)
- 1992 buick roadmaster estate wagon(US $1,000.00)
- 66k original miles ''yes 66k'' extr clean-affordable and best of all no reserve!
- 1995 buick roadmaster estate limited wagon 5.7 liter v8 loaded stunning must see(US $5,995.00)
- 1995 buick roadmaster limited 59,000leather, excellent shape** no reserve**
- 1941 buick roadmaster convertible. factory black 2x2 intake setup(US $13,000.00)
Auto Services in Colorado
Wollert Automotive ★★★★★
Vanatta Auto Electric ★★★★★
Ultra Bond Windshield Repair & Replacement ★★★★★
Tunerz, Boomerz And More ★★★★★
Star Crack Windshield Repair By Joy ★★★★★
Spradley Barr Mazda ★★★★★
Auto blog
Buick picks top 11 highlights from first 11 decades
Sun, 21 Apr 2013Buick has taken the time to highlight some of the company's personal points of pride from the past 110 years. Those include everything from the automaker's very first vehicle, the 1904 Model B, to what Buick claims is the world's first concept car: The 1938 Y Job (above). That one also walked away with the worst name for a design study.
All told, the automaker has sold 43 million vehicles through the end of last year, and those include the lusty 1963 Riviera. That model celebrates its 50th anniversary in 2013, and remains one of the brand's most iconic designs.
Of course, Buick is rightfully proud of its quickest model, too. The 1987 GNX managed a 4.6-second bolt to 60 mph in tests by Car and Driver, and it also took the honor of being one of the automaker's rarest creations at just 547 units. You can check out all 10 in the gallery above.
2018 Buick Regal TourX vs. wagon competitors: How it compares on paper
Wed, Jan 31 2018To the great joy of auto enthusiasts nationwide, wagons are back! Well, at least there's a few more of them. The latest is the 2018 Buick Regal TourX, which we just had our first drive of and found to actually be quite good with pleasant handling, solid power and plenty of space. But, how does the TourX compare to other cladded wagons? Well, let's dive into the specs and fire up the ol' spreadsheet maker for Buick Regal TourX vs Subaru Outback vs Audi A4 Allroad vs VW Alltrack vs Volvo V60 Cross Country. True, some are from mainstream brands and others are from luxury marques, but Buick straddles both realms, so it's appropriate to look at them all. Of course, there's more to these cars than just the numbers, but they're still important, and in the case of this class of crossover-aping wagons, can vary more than you'd expect. So check out the specs in the chart below, which are followed by more analysis and photos of each. Discover and compare other wagons and crossovers with our Car Finder and Compare tools. Engines and Transmissions When comparing powertrains, the Buick is far-and-away the winner as far as torque is concerned, and is in a nearly three-way tie for horsepower. Its 295 pound-feet of torque is 22 lb-ft more twist than the next-most-grunty Audi A4 Allroad. And in regards to power, the Buick's 250-horsepower engine is only down 6 hp to the most-powerful Subaru and its optional naturally aspirated flat-six, and just 2 hp less than the Audi. At the bottom of the pack is the Subaru Outback with the standard naturally aspirated flat-four, which only makes 174 hp and 174 lb-ft of torque. That may not seem too bad compared with the VW Golf Alltrack, which only makes 170 hp and 199 lb-ft of torque, but the VW is much lighter by between 200 and 300 pounds. Transmission-wise, there's quite a bit of variation in the group. The Regal TourX and the Volvo V60 Cross Country rely on eight-speed automatics, all Outbacks use CVTs, and the Alltrack and Allroad have dual-clutch automated manual transmissions with six and seven gears, respectively. But for people that want to shift for themselves, the only option is the Volkswagen, which offers a traditional six-speed manual transmission on the Golf Alltrack. Cargo and Interior Space One of the main reasons to buy a wagon is for the body style's large cargo capacity. And for the most space for things and stuff, you'll want to check out the Subaru and the Buick.
GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?
Fri, Jul 21 2017General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.