Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1963 Buick Riviera First Year Classic Very Original Runs Great Stock Complete on 2040-cars

Year:1963 Mileage:52935 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

St. George, Utah, United States

St. George, Utah, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Engine:401CID Nailhead V-8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 7K1123571 Year: 1963
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Buick
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Riviera
Trim: Coupe
Drive Type: Rear Wheel Drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 52,935
Sub Model: Deluxe
Exterior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Complete, stock, original, well-preserved, great driving, first-year example of the ground-breaking 1963 Buick Riviera. This beauty runs and drives well and may very possibly have 52,935 original miles based on the condition of the undercarriage, engine compartment (see pics) and how she drives (solid and tight with no rattles).


Below is a detailed description of the Riviera and it's significant place in automotive history from Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you read it carefully. And further below is a more detailed description of this particular Riviera.

"The production Riviera shared its body shell with no other model, which was unusual for a GM product. It rode a cruciform frame similar to the standard Buick frame, but shorter and narrower, with a 2.0 in (51 mm) narrower track. Its wheelbase of 117 in (3,000 mm) and overall length of 208 in (5,300 mm) were 6.0 inches (150 mm) and 7.7 in (200 mm) shorter, respectively, than a Buick LeSabre, but slightly longer than a contemporary Thunderbird. At 3,998 lb (1,813 kg),[3] it was about 390 pounds (180 kg) lighter than either. It shared the standard Buick V8 engines, with a displacement of either 401 cu in (6.57 L) or 425 cu in (6.96 l), and the unique continuously-variable design Twin Turbine automatic transmission. Power brakes were standard, using Buick's massive "Al-Fin" (aluminum finned) drums of 12 in (300 mm) diameter. Power steering was standard equipment, with an overall steering ratio of 20.5:1, giving 3.5 turns lock-to-lock.

The Riviera's suspension used the same basic design as standard Buicks, with double wishbones in front and a live axle located by trailing arms and a lateral track bar, but the roll centers were raised to reduce body lean. Although its coil springs were actually slightly softer than other Buicks, with the lighter overall weight, the net effect was to make the Riviera somewhat firmer. Although still biased towards understeer, contemporary testers considered it one of the most roadable American cars, with an excellent balance of comfort and agility.

The Riviera was introduced on October 4, 1962 as a 1963 model, with the 325 hp (242 kW) 401 cu in (6.6 l) "Nailhead" V-8 as the only available engine,[4] fitted with dual exhaust as standard equipment, and the Turbine Drive the only transmission,[5] at a base price of $4,333;[6] typical delivered prices with options ran upwards of $5,000. Buick announced in December, 1962, the availability of a 340 hp (250 kW) 425 cu in (7.0 l) version of the Nailhead as an option. Total production was deliberately limited to 40,000 vehicles (in a year that Buick sold 440,000 units overall) to emphasize its exclusivity and to increase demand; only 2,601 of them were delivered with the 425 cu in (7.0 l) engine in the 1963 model year.

With the same power as the larger Buicks and less weight, the Riviera had sparkling all-around performance: Motor Trend found it capable of running 0–60 mph (0–97 km/h) in 8 seconds or less, the standing quarter mile in about 16 seconds, and an observed top speed of 115 miles per hour (185 km/h), although 125 miles per hour (201 km/h) was feasible with a longer run. Fuel economy was a meager 13.2 miles per US gallon (17.8 L/100 km; 15.9 mpg-imp). Front leg room was 40.1 inches.[7]

Inside, the Riviera featured a four-place cabin with front bucket seats separated by a center console with floor shifter and storage compartment that was built into the instrument panel, and bucket-style seats in the rear. Upholstery choices included all-vinyl, cloth and vinyl, or optional leather. A deluxe interior option included real walnut inserts on the doors and below the rear side windows. Popular extra-cost options included a tilt steering wheel, power windows, power driver's seat, air conditioning, a remote-control side view mirror, and white sidewall tires.

Total sales for the three model years was a respectable 112,244. All in all, the Riviera was extremely well received and considered a great success, giving the Thunderbird its first real competition.

The first-generation Riviera is considered a styling landmark, and is quite collectible today.[9]


The 1963-1965 Riviera met with approval from all quarters, and has since earned Milestone status from the Milestone Car Society. Jaguar founder and designer Sir William Lyons said that Mitchell had done "a very wonderful job," and Sergio Pininfarina declared it "one of the most beautiful American cars ever built; it has marked a very impressive return to simplicity of American car design." At its debut at the Paris Auto ShowRaymond Loewy said the Riviera was the handsomest American production car—apart from his own Studebaker Avanti, that is, the Riviera's only real competition for 1963.[10]"

This example has completely stock running gear as described above. The engine compartment is wonderfully original down to the paint on the engine block (see pics). A new fuel pump, battery, starter, and alternator have been installed but the car has been sitting for extended periods on occasion and could benefit from a tune-up. It also could use an exhaust repair on the drivers side. As it is though, I've been driving it around the neighborhood recently and it's been a blast. Tires have great tread but are cracking, it steers straight and true, and brakes are strong with a slight pull to the right. It also has adjustable air shocks in the rear.

The interior is complete and original minus the radio and seats. They are electric, fit in place nicely, and would look great upholstered to a decent standard. Right now they are just resting in place with two bolts apiece. All interior trim pieces have been bead-blasted and powder-coated (see pics). They are sitting in the trunk ready for installation. Headliner has been removed but has also been included for reuse or as a pattern. This car has the deluxe interior option with the walnut inserts. Dash has cracking but is uncut and unbutchered with all hard-to-find buttons and knobs still in place. 2 of 4 electric windows operate well. Floor pan and trunk have had previous repairs; passenger floor still needs minor work (see pics). Trunk and passenger cabin floors have all been coated with heavy-duty frame enamel for further protection. Speedometer, odometer, lights, and windshield wipers work properly. And even the clock works.

The body is solid and uncut with previously repaired rust areas to the rear quarter panels that are showing their age, especially on the passenger side (see pics). The inner fender wells are rock solid all the way around. Rust protectant has been applied where necessary to prevent further issues. All exterior trim is in good shape with no pieces missing except the hood ornament. I cannot find any sign of prior accident history. It looks like it has had two ancient resprays over the original light blue; one in a darker blue and the other in red. The red is faded well and has a cool patina about it. Eventually, it should be returned to the original shade of light blue. Just my opinion.

Since this is a body-on-frame car with a great frame, the body issues are not significant; nothing comes even remotely close to jeopardizing structural integrity like you might find in an older unibody car. And all panels are readily available if you choose to go that route, but you certainly don't need to. As it is, this car is beautiful, it's complete, it's original, it drives great, etc... I'm selling it for a buddy of mine and he's heartbroken he can't keep it but he has a young family and cash is king right now.

My name is Chris and I am happy to answer your questions. Please call me at 435-669-1470. I also have tons of additional pictures that show every nook and cranny plus all the extra parts that are included. Send me a non-Ebay email address and I will send them promptly. The car is located in the dry, desert community of St. George, Utah (about 100 miles north of Las Vegas). Thank you very much for your interest,







Auto Services in Utah

Westech Equipment ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Industrial Equipment & Supplies, Generators
Address: 195 W 3900 S, Salt-Lake-City
Phone: (855) 769-1763

West Valley Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 1975 S 1045 W, Bingham-Canyon
Phone: (801) 974-5030

Wasatch Body Shop, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Rustproofing & Undercoating-Automotive
Address: 373 American Ave, Bountiful
Phone: (801) 618-4594

Unique Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 11521 S Redwood Rd, South-Jordan
Phone: (801) 302-0966

Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 777 W Riverdale Rd, Sunset
Phone: (855) 634-0095

Tint Specialists Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Detailing
Address: 4800 South 150 West #40, West-Valley-City
Phone: (801) 261-3232

Auto blog

BMW tops Consumer Reports 2023 Brand Report Card

Thu, Feb 16 2023

Feels like we wrote about Consumer Reports' 2022 Brand Report Car and 10 Top Picks a few weeks ago, but it was last April. So the mag is back with a ranked roster of 32 brands and 10 vehicles in four categories for your debating pleasure. Starting with the brands, last year's top three were Subaru, Mazda and BMW. This year, the Munich crew climbed two spots to win the prize thanks to "Superb road test scores and solid results in CR’s reliability and owner satisfaction surveys." Subaru narrowly fell to second, maintaining its four-year run in the top three. Mini, eighth last year, jumped five spots to get the last step on the podium. The rest of the top 10 were Lexus (up one spot from last year), Honda (down one spot from last year), Toyota (up three), Genesis (up 12), Mazda (down six), Audi (down three) and Kia (up eight). The magazine and testing outfit says its Brand Report Card "[reveals] which automakers are producing the most well-performing, safe, and reliable vehicles based on CRÂ’s independent testing and member surveys," and that "Brands that rise to the top tend to have the most consistent performance across their model lineups." Last year's top 10 had six automakers from Japan, three from Germany (giving Mini credit for England), none from the U.S. or South Korea, and five luxury brands. This year's list counts five makes from Japan, two from Germany because Porsche fell out of the top ten, two from South Korea, still none from the U.S., and four luxury brands. Buick again ranked as the best domestic, dropping to 12th after being 11th last year. The big mover was Lincoln, its 10-place jump up to 16th attributed to better reliability from the Corsair and Nautilus. Tesla's improved overall reliability saw it climb six spots to 17th. Dodge climbed one spot to 15th. Jeep got out of the penalty box in last to come second-to-last. Land Rover fell three places into the penalty spot.  CR's top 10 vehicle models The 10 Top Picks list is practically a new list. Only two holdovers made it to 2023, those being the Subaru Forester and Kia Telluride.

GM earnings rise 1% as buyers pay more for popular pickups

Thu, Aug 1 2019

DETROIT — General Motors said Thursday that higher prices for popular pickup trucks and SUVs helped overcome slowing global sales and profit rose by 1% in the second quarter. The Detroit automaker said it made $2.42 billion, or $1.66 per share, from April through June. Adjusting for restructuring costs, GM made $1.64 per share, blowing by analyst estimates of $1.44. Quarterly revenue fell 2% to $36.06 billion, but still beat estimates. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $35.97 billion. Global sales fell 6% to 1.94 million vehicles led by declines in North America and Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company says sales in China were weak, and it expects that to continue through the year. In the United States, customers paid an average of $41,461 for a GM vehicle during the quarter, an increase of 2.2%, as buyers went for loaded-out pickups and SUVs, according to the Edmunds.com auto pricing site. The U.S. is GM's most profitable market. Chief Financial Officer Dhivya Suryadevara said she expects the strong pricing to continue, especially as GM rolls out a diesel pickup and new heavy-duty trucks in the second half of the year. "We think the fundamentals do remain strong, especially in the truck market," she said, adding that strength in the overall economy and aging trucks now on the road should help keep the trend going. Light trucks accounted for 83.1% of GM's sales in the quarter, and pickup truck sales rose 8.5% as GM transitioned to new models of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra, according to Edmunds, which provides content to The Associated Press. As usual, GM made most of its money in North America, reporting $3 billion in pretax earnings. International operations including China broke even, while the company spent $300 million on its GM Cruise automated vehicle unit. Its financial arm made $500 million in pretax income. Suryadevara said GM saw $700 million in savings during the quarter from restructuring actions announced late last year that included cutting about 8,000 white-collar workers through layoffs, buyouts and early retirements. The company also announced plans to close five North American factories, shedding another 6,000 jobs. About 3,000 factory workers in the U.S. whose jobs were eliminated at four plants will be placed at other factories, but they could have to relocate. GM expects the restructuring to generate $2 billion to $2.5 billion in annual cost savings by the end of this year.

Buick Cascada convertible likely dead after 2019

Tue, Oct 9 2018

Opel announced it was discontinuing a few cars today, but the one that got our attention was the Cascada. The plan is to let the Opel Cascada live out its life until the end of 2019, with no replacement in the works. This brings into question the future of the Buick Cascada sold in the United States, since it's basically the same car and produced by Opel in the same factory in Poland. The Cascada has been on sale in other markets since 2012 badged as either an Opel or Vauxhall, but the Buick-badged car was only introduced in North America for the 2016 model year. Of course, Buick could decide to build the model beyond 2019, but it would need to find a new manufacturing location, convertibles aren't exactly popular, and the car would be egregiously old at that point. In other words, it looks like the Cascada is dead after 2019. We asked Buick what the game plan might be, and were told that there is nothing official to say at the moment. That's par for the course for something a manufacturer doesn't want to talk about yet, but it's also possible the announcement came as a surprise. Opel is no longer owned by GM, so the announcement actually came from the brand's new PSA ownership (the same French company that owns Peugeot and Citroen). As for the rationale behind the decision, that was a head scratcher, too. Opel/PSA said it was discontinuing the Cascada, as well as the subcompact Adam and Karl, in order to meet increasingly stringent emissions requirements and produce crossovers instead. This seems contradictory. Replacing a low-selling convertible and a pair of low-profit subcompacts with high-selling, high-profit crossovers sure seems like a solid business decision more than an emissions requirement one. Indeed, the Buick Cascada has never been a raging success in the United States either, with only 5,595 leaving the lots in 2017. It helped bring in some different kinds of customers to the Buick brand, but the impact is minute compared to a vehicle like the hot-selling Buick Encore. Related video: Featured Gallery 2019 Buick Cascada View 17 Photos Rumormill Buick Opel Convertible buick cascada