Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Buick Lesabre Custom 4 Door Family Car on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:135315 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Harrisville, West Virginia, United States

Harrisville, West Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.8L 3800CC 231Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1g4hp52k9xh491217 Year: 1999
Make: Buick
Model: LeSabre
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: Custom Sedan 4-Door
Options: Cassette Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 135,315
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6
Disability Equipped: No
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is our Buick  that we have had sense it had 20.000 miles on it,  we have had her about 8 yrs ,my wife is a teacher and she used it to go back and forth to school and stores ,with a trip here and there , it has the bullet proof 3.8 L motor , that still is in very good mechanical con,it gets around 30 miles per gallon on hwy  and has all the power one would ever need,it could use carpet shampooed and a new set of tires in the near future ,it has a scratch here and there  but for a 1999 she still looks nice,in the past year i have put all new struts front and back, new brakes new front wheel hubs and bearings,oil was changed 10-15 13 i change oil every 2500 miles have sense we bought it,,this is not a brand new car it has been used  but taken care of and will make someone a good car,only reason for selling we bought a 2003 Buick Lesabre thanks for looking .

Auto Services in West Virginia

Total Image Paint & Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1480 Beverly Mnr, Mabie
Phone: (304) 635-0355

Shartzer Auto Wrecking ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 3992 National Pike, Brandonville
Phone: (724) 329-5523

Sammy D`s Preowned Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: MEADOWBROOK Rd, Meadowbrook
Phone: (304) 592-5533

Novus Auto Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 4227 Maccorkle Ave SE, Malden
Phone: (681) 205-8945

Meadows Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 514 Route 62, Red-House
Phone: (304) 586-4374

Harpold`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Carburetors
Address: 110 N Linden Ave, Spelter
Phone: (304) 622-1731

Auto blog

38k GM eAssist hybrids recalled for circuit board, fire risk

Mon, 06 May 2013

General Motors has issued a recall covering 38,197 2012 and 2013 model-year Chevy Malibu Eco, Buick LaCrosse and Regal sedans equipped with eAssist, and sold in the United States. The automaker will check the generator control module for proper operation. Only vehicles built before December 2012 are being recalled.
According to the automaker, a malfunctioning generator control module could slowly drain the battery, causing an indicator to light up in the dash. If that indicator is ignored, the driver may experience a stalling engine, and in some cases, "a burning or melting odor, smoke, and, in rare instances, a fire in the trunk."
GM says the issue is not with the eAssist battery pack; the smoke and fire comes from overheating of the control board. One trunk fire has been reported, but no injuries are known. Scroll down below for the official press release from GM.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Texas sues GM, saying it tricked customers into sharing driving data sold to insurers

Wed, Aug 14 2024

Texas filed a lawsuit Tuesday against GM over years of alleged abuse of customers' data and trust. New car owners were presented with a "confusing and highly misleading" process that was implied to be for their safety, but "was no more than a deceptively designed sales flow" that surrendered their data for GM to sell. The suit contends that at no point was selling driving data ever even suggested as a possibility, putting GM in violation of the state's consumer protection laws. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is seeking a jury trial and at least $10,000 per offense (every GM car sold in the state since 2015) and a hefty add-on of $250,000 in cases where the victim was over 65. Texas seems to be flying high after a recent $1.4 billion settlement from Meta over other privacy concerns. This may well be a way to solve any pending budgetary issues in the Lone Star State.