Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1995 Bmw M3 Fresh Headgasket on 2040-cars

Year:1995 Mileage:207000 Color: Red /
 Black
Location:

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 2990CC l6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: wbsbf9329seh07804 Make: BMW
Model: M3
Year: 1995
Trim: Base Coupe 2-Door
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, Leather Seats
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 207,000
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 2
Number of Cylinders: 6
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1995 BMW M3

207k miles

5-speed


Good

New headgasket and seals

New radiator and hoses

Megan Coilovers with camber plates

Fresh oil change

New fan blade

Adjustable rear control arms

Reinforcement plate rear shock towers 

Poly RTAB’s

Aluminum water pump and housing 

New thermostat 

Fresh coolant

New knock sensors

New NGK spark plugs 

All maintenance history

Clear title

Tags up to date till April

Rebuilt Differential internals 

New battery

Dinan Chip

Owner’s manual

New OEM clutch 

Muffler and resonator Delete

New Rotors



Bad 

Sounds like a valve tick or a bent valve don’t really know.  Car runs and drives but doesn’t have full power.  Might also be the vanos, not sure.

Driver side seat torn 

Some door dings

Needs alignment

Passenger side window motor out

Could use a paint job

Door panels coming un-glued

Hood is painted chalkboard paint black 

Only 1 key to vehicle

Sunroof doesn’t tilt up

Anything else just ask.   

More pictures can be sent upon request


Auto Services in Oklahoma

Valley Body Shop ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 723 W Grant Ave, Pauls-Valley
Phone: (405) 238-7927

Shade-Makers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Industrial Equipment & Supplies
Address: 2421 Co Op Dr, Muldrow
Phone: (479) 474-3002

Safelite AutoGlass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 4100 Will Rogers Pkwy Ste 1000, Oklahoma-City
Phone: (405) 235-3000

Precision Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3 N Highway 81, Duncan
Phone: (580) 252-9904

Owasso Automotive Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Consultants, Brake Repair
Address: 212 N Main St, Owasso
Phone: (918) 272-7437

Nicoma Park Muffler ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 12005 NE 23rd St, Choctaw
Phone: (405) 769-9100

Auto blog

NHTSA slaps BMW with $40M fine for slow Mini recall

Thu, Dec 24 2015

BMW is on the hook for a $40-million fine after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration slapped the automaker over not recalling Minis that failed to meet minimum side-impact crash standards. The civil penalty from NHTSA concerns 2014 and 2015 Mini Cooper hatchback models that "failed a crash test designed to determine whether the vehicle met crash-protection minimums," the government agency said in a press release issued this week. An October 2014 test revealed the first problem, and the Mini was subsequently retested in July, only to fail again and finally prompt a recall of more than 30,000 cars. But according to NHTSA's investigation that was opened in October, BMW waited too long to issue a recall after it knew the cars did not meet standards and bring them into compliance with more energy-absorbing materials installed by Mini dealers. This is the second time NHTSA slapped BMW with a major penalty, following a $3-million fine back in 2012 failing to report recalls of its cars and motorcycles. "For the second time in three years, BMW has been penalized for failing to meet that obligation," NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind said in the release. "The company must take this opportunity to reform its procedures and its culture to put safety where it belongs: at the top of its priority list." In a separate release issued this week, BMW Group said it, "is committed to further improving its recall processes to better serve its customers," and that the company, "respects the role of NHTSA and looks forward to working with them to develop solutions for the future." National Highway Traffic Safety Administration fines BMW $40 million for failing to meet safety requirements Fine is auto company's second since 2012 WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has imposed a $40 million civil penalty and a series of performance requirements to automaker BMW North America for a series of violations of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act and NHTSA regulations. Under terms of a Consent Order issued to BMW, the company acknowledges that it violated requirements to issue a timely recall of vehicles that did not comply with minimum crash protection standards, to notify owners of recalls in a timely fashion, and to provide accurate information about its recalls to NHTSA. NHTSA imposed a $3 million civil penalty to BMW in 2012 for similar violations.

Motor Trend first to compare Jaguar XE and BMW 3 Series

Tue, Jun 30 2015

How many automakers have loaded up how much ammo and taken how many shots at the BMW 3 Series? Yet here we are, decades on and at least a decade away from the 3 Series' halcyon days, waiting for someone to give the sport sedan something beyond a flesh wound. In this most recent episode of Head 2 Head, Johnny Lieberman goes to Spain to figure out if the Jaguar XE is the sedan to do it. Here the champion wears the guise of the 335i M Sport, powered by a 3.0-liter, turbocharged, inline-six with a square 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque run through a ZF eight-speed transmission. After a short time behind the wheel Lieberman quotes from a familiar hagiography, saying it's evident "just how great this car is and why it defines the segment." The all-aluminum challenger from Jaguar comes in XES trim, meaning a 3.0-liter, supercharged V6 with 340 hp and 332 lb-ft. It uses the same eight-speed transmission as the BMW, but with different programming. According to the specs in the video, some of which are manufacturer estimates, the Jaguar is heavier, more expensive, and much thirstier at the pump. Away from the spreadsheet, Lieberman holds that the XE looks better and feels more special inside. In case you're wondering, the comparo was done before MT could get its mitts on the 320-hp BMW 340i. Lieberman says the English company spent its money on the XE suspension and it shows, but there have been other efforts from other automakers with excellent dynamic chops that weren't enough to threaten the BMW. His final assessment is that one of the two cars is awesome, and one is quite a bit better. Watch the video to find out which is which. Related Gallery 2016 Jaguar XE View 74 Photos Related Gallery 2016 BMW 3 Series Refresh View 57 Photos News Source: Motor Trend Channel via Carscoops, YouTube BMW Jaguar Luxury Performance Sedan motor trend jaguar xe head 2 head

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.