Donohoo, Clean Carfax & Autocheck! Tech Pkg, Navigation, Leather, Sunroof on 2040-cars
Pelham, Alabama, United States
Engine:2.4L 2354CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Wagon
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Make: Acura
Model: TSX
Options: Sunroof, Leather
Trim: Base Wagon 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Passenger Side Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 4,779
Doors: 4
Sub Model: 5dr Sport Wgn I4 Auto Tech Pkg
Engine Description: 2.4L L4 DOHC 16V
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 4
Acura TSX for Sale
- Leather 2.4l anti-theft device(s) side air bag system anti theft/security system(US $21,500.00)
- 2.4 2.4l cd 4 wheel disc brakes abs am/fm radio ac compass black mp3 moonroof sd
- 2.4 2.4l cd 4 wheel disc brakes abs am/fm radio ac compass moonroof mp3 silver
- 2004 acura tsx base sedan 4-door 2.4l
- 2004 acura tsx base sedan 4-door 2.4l(US $9,000.00)
- 2005 acura tsx 6speed manual <low reserve> 2.4l vtec new clutch & fly wheel rare(US $10,995.00)
Auto Services in Alabama
Twinz Auto Company ★★★★★
The Pit Stop ★★★★★
Steve`s Discount Muffler ★★★★★
Sport Center Imports ★★★★★
Scott Stevens Tires ★★★★★
Rob`e Mans ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
2013 Acura ZDX
Wed, 09 Oct 2013What Is, What Could Have Been, And What May Yet Be
History is largely unkind to losers. That's true in the world of politics and sports, and it follows on with a few caveats in the realm of automobiles.
In terms of cars, historic losers tend to be remembered in one of two broad ways. Every once in a while, unsuccessful or oddball models actually make reputational gains after some time away from the new-car marketplace. I consider the Saab 9-2X one of the recent poster children for this group; a car that moved like molasses on dealer lots in the mid-2000s but has morphed into a sort of hard-to-find, used gem in recent years. More often, though, that which was unloved when new remains unloved with tens or hundreds of thousands of miles on the odometer. Pontiac's seriously misunderstood Aztek has king status here (despite the wailings of oddball fan clubs across the nation), so much so that invoking "Aztek" as a pejorative stopped being pithy about a dozen years ago.
Honda is spending $124 million on a new wind tunnel facility in Ohio
Fri, Apr 21 2017Ford isn't the only company building a multi-million dollar wind tunnel this year. Honda is also getting in on the action. Its new facility will cost less than Ford's at $124 million, and construction begins this summer. It will be built at the Transportation Research Center in Ohio, which is where Honda's NSX proving grounds are located. Honda will install a five-belt rolling road in the tunnel for testing of more pedestrian vehicles, and a wide, high-speed, single belt version for testing of sports cars and race cars. However, it seems the Honda facility will only be capable of testing wind speeds of up to 192 mph, whereas Ford claims a top speed of 200 mph. Cameras and microphones will also be set up inside the testing area at the Honda tunnel to help find wind noise trouble spots. Honda won't necessarily be the only company using the new wind tunnel either. The facility will be available for other groups and companies to use. There are even secure bays those groups can use for their work. Related Video: