2004 Volvo C70 Convertible Runs Great 101k No Rust Needs Some Cosmetics 1 Owner on 2040-cars
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
I HAVE TO SAY, I LOVE DRIVING THIS CAR. IT RUNS SMOOTHLY AND THE MOTOR HAS GREAT POWER WITH NO CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND NO ISSUES. THE TRANSMISSION SHIFTS GREAT AND THE SUSPENSION IS FINE. 80% LEFT ON THE TIRES AND EVERYTHING WORKS INCLUDING THE TOP, WINDOWS, ICE COLD AC AND HOT HEAT. CRUISE WORKS AS WELL AS THE POWER SEATS. THE MOTOR HAS NO LEAKS AND IS DRY AS A BONE. 90% OF THE COSMETIC ISSUES ON THIS CAR HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE FLORIDA SUN. THE CAR IS GREAT ON THE HIGHWAY AND AROUND TOWN. GOOD GAS MILEAGE AND BEST OF ALL IT'S A ONE OWNER CAR. THE TITLE WAS ISSUED ON 09/09/2004 AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN A FLORIDA CAR SO NO RUST ISSUES. NEW BATTERY AND RECENT BRAKES. ALWAYS MAINTAINED MECHANICALLY. PLEASE CALL 561-318-0010 FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR JUST SEND A MESSAGE THROUGH EBAY. THANKS AND GOOD LUCK.
THIS IS AN ORIGINAL PAINT CAR SO WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET. IT'S STRAIGHT. THE COSMETIC ISSUES CAN BE ADDRESSED OVER TIME WHILE YOU ARE ENJOYING DRIVING IT. THE SEATS CAN BE RECOVERED IN CLOTH WHICH IS MY PREFERENCE FOR A CONVERTIBLE FOR A FEW HUNDRED BUCKS AND THE REST OF THE LITTLE STUFF CAN BE ADDRESSED IN TIME BECAUSE NONE OF IT IS URGENT. I HAVEN'T HAD THE CAR DETAILED SO I'M SURE AT MOST OF THE BLEMISHES WILL DISAPPEAR WITH A BUFF JOB. I DON'T WANT TO TALK THE CAR DOWN BECAUSE OUT OF MY MINI, MY SL500 AND MY JAGUAR, THIS IS MY FAVORITE TO DRIVE AND THAT'S THE TRUTH. IT'S COMFORTABLE AND SMOOTH AND LOOKS REALLY NICE AS WELL. IF YOU NEVER HAD ONE OF THESE AND DON'T WANT TO SPEND THE 6-9000 DOLLARS THEY ARE ASKING FOR 2004s THEN THIS CAR WILL BE A GREAT BUY. I HOPE YOU LOVE IT AS MUCH AS I DO. |
Volvo C70 for Sale
- Volvo c70 coupe ht no reserve
- Mint volvo c70 2011 convertible hard top silver with tan leather(US $11,500.00)
- 2007 volvo c70 t5, hardtop convertable, one owner, like new(US $11,950.00)
- 1999 volvo c70 base convertible 2-door 2.4l ((( 119k on miles)))
- 1999 volvo c70 convertible perfect southern carfax!(US $4,700.00)
- 2008 volvo c70 ( excellent )(US $12,500.00)
Auto Services in Florida
Your Personal Mechanic ★★★★★
Xotic Dream Cars ★★★★★
Wilke`s General Automotive ★★★★★
Whitehead`s Automotive And Radiator Repairs ★★★★★
US Auto Body Shop ★★★★★
United Imports ★★★★★
Auto blog
IIHS says these are the safest cars of 2013
Wed, 02 Jan 2013The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has revealed its annual list of Top Safety Picks, an award that highlights automobiles it says offer "superior crash protection." A new and still more significant award, the Top Safety Pick+ honor, is given to those vehicles that earn good ratings for occupant protection in four out of five areas of measure. And while some 117 vehicles were given the TSP seal of approval for 2013, just 13 passed muster for TSP+.
To be fair, IIHS only evaluated 29 vehicles with its new testing procedures for TSP+ (we'd expect that the number of qualified cars will rise substantially for 2014). Luxury and Near Luxury midsize cars were the first groups evaluated, followed by midsizers in the Moderately Priced Cars category - unsurprisingly, it's only midsize cars that you'll find among the class this year.
Only two luxury sedans made the list of 13 for 2013: the Acura TL and Volvo S60. The other 11 cars on the list included entries from domestic, Japanese and German car makers: Dodge Avenger, Chrysler 200, Ford Fusion, Honda Accord (sedan and coupe), Kia Optima (but not its close kin, the Hyundai Sonata, strangely), Nissan Altima, Subaru Legacy and Outback, Suzuki Kizashi and the Volkswagen Passat all made the grade.
2018 Buick Regal TourX vs. wagon competitors: How it compares on paper
Wed, Jan 31 2018To the great joy of auto enthusiasts nationwide, wagons are back! Well, at least there's a few more of them. The latest is the 2018 Buick Regal TourX, which we just had our first drive of and found to actually be quite good with pleasant handling, solid power and plenty of space. But, how does the TourX compare to other cladded wagons? Well, let's dive into the specs and fire up the ol' spreadsheet maker for Buick Regal TourX vs Subaru Outback vs Audi A4 Allroad vs VW Alltrack vs Volvo V60 Cross Country. True, some are from mainstream brands and others are from luxury marques, but Buick straddles both realms, so it's appropriate to look at them all. Of course, there's more to these cars than just the numbers, but they're still important, and in the case of this class of crossover-aping wagons, can vary more than you'd expect. So check out the specs in the chart below, which are followed by more analysis and photos of each. Discover and compare other wagons and crossovers with our Car Finder and Compare tools. Engines and Transmissions When comparing powertrains, the Buick is far-and-away the winner as far as torque is concerned, and is in a nearly three-way tie for horsepower. Its 295 pound-feet of torque is 22 lb-ft more twist than the next-most-grunty Audi A4 Allroad. And in regards to power, the Buick's 250-horsepower engine is only down 6 hp to the most-powerful Subaru and its optional naturally aspirated flat-six, and just 2 hp less than the Audi. At the bottom of the pack is the Subaru Outback with the standard naturally aspirated flat-four, which only makes 174 hp and 174 lb-ft of torque. That may not seem too bad compared with the VW Golf Alltrack, which only makes 170 hp and 199 lb-ft of torque, but the VW is much lighter by between 200 and 300 pounds. Transmission-wise, there's quite a bit of variation in the group. The Regal TourX and the Volvo V60 Cross Country rely on eight-speed automatics, all Outbacks use CVTs, and the Alltrack and Allroad have dual-clutch automated manual transmissions with six and seven gears, respectively. But for people that want to shift for themselves, the only option is the Volkswagen, which offers a traditional six-speed manual transmission on the Golf Alltrack. Cargo and Interior Space One of the main reasons to buy a wagon is for the body style's large cargo capacity. And for the most space for things and stuff, you'll want to check out the Subaru and the Buick.
Volvo V90 Cross Country vs V60 Cross Country Luggage Test | Comparing cargo areas
Fri, Jun 4 2021While the Audi A6 Allroad and Mercedes E 450 All-Terrain have disappointed us with their poseur levels of capability and questionable value, that is not the case with the other midsize luxury off-roadish wagon: the 2021 Volvo V90 Cross Country. It has genuinely useful extra ground clearance and a lower, more sensible price. But what about that other element of wagon goodness, utility? Although I have not luggage-tested the Allroad or All-Terrain, Road Test Editor Zac Palmer effectively did so using different luggage and different A6/E-Class wagon variants. Our results are therefore only vaguely comparable. My guess is the Mercedes would win the day and the V90 would top the Audi, but again, that's just a guess. I have, however, luggage-tested Volvo's smaller off-roadish wagon, the V60 Cross Country. Surprisingly, the difference between Cross Countries isn't that great. According to Volvo's wonderfully detailed cargo specifications that indicate what exactly they measured (hint hint, every other car company), the V90 Cross Country (above left) has 25.5 cubic-feet of space behind the back seat from floor to roof. The V60 Cross Country (right) has 23.2 cubic feet. That's not much of a difference. However, Volvo also provides the cargo area length from the seat base to the liftgate. That's a bigger difference on paper: 45.4 inches for the V90 and 40.7 inches for the V60. That would play out once I brought the luggage into the equation. Before we get to the bags, though, take one more look at the above comparison photo. Check out the different D pillars and specifically how much more upright the V60's are. That's my guess as to why the V90 cargo area manages to be so much longer, yet has only a minor volume difference. Same bags, same formation, different Volvo wagons. You clearly see here that there's more length available in the V90. Five inches more? I don't know about that, but you nevertheless DO get more space. As with every luggage test I do, I use two midsize roller suitcases that would need to be checked in at the airport (26 inches long, 16 wide, 11 deep), two roll-aboard suitcases that just barely fit in the overhead (24L x 15W x 10D), and one smaller roll-aboard that fits easily (23L x 15W x 10D). I also include my wife's fancy overnight bag just to spruce things up a bit (21L x 12W x 12D).