Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Rare And Classic; Mechanically Solid on 2040-cars

Year:1989 Mileage:111858 Color: White /
 Tan
Location:

Tampa, Florida, United States

Tampa, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.3L I4 MPI
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: yv1ax8845k1354058 Year: 1989
Make: Volvo
Model: 240
Trim: GL
Options: Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 111,858
Exterior Color: White
Number of Doors: 4
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 4
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Florida

Z Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 529 N US Highway 17 92, Forest-City
Phone: (407) 695-6000

Vu Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 419 W Robinson St, Winter-Garden
Phone: (407) 841-7555

Vertex Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 3030 SW 38th Ave, Coral-Gables
Phone: (305) 442-2727

Velocity Factor ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2516 NW Boca Raton Blvd, Briny-Breezes
Phone: (561) 395-5700

USA Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 101 E Palmetto St, Welaka
Phone: (386) 325-9611

Tropic Tint 3M Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Draperies, Curtains & Window Treatments, Window Tinting
Address: 16322 Port Dickinson Dr, Wellington
Phone: (561) 427-6868

Auto blog

Ford tumbles to second worst in Consumer Reports reliability survey, list dominated by Japanese [w/video]

Mon, 29 Oct 2012

It's no secret that MyFord Touch has had its share of problems since being introduced, but the most recent reliability survey from Consumer Reports shows just how much this infotainment system has affected Ford. Just two years ago, the automaker was in the top 10 for the institute's reliability rankings, but since then, it has tumbled to the second-lowest rung just above dead-last Jaguar. In addition to MyFord Touch, CR also attributes a handful of new products that have had issues right out of the gate.
Compiled from 1.2 million subscriber surveys, this year's auto reliability survey heavily favors Japanese automakers, with eight of the 10 spots hailing from Japan. Toyota brands grabbed the top three spots (Scion, Toyota and Lexus - in that order) with Mazda, Subaru, Honda and Acura filling the next four spots. The only non-Asian automaker cracking the top 10 was Audi at number eight.
Audi climbed a total of 18 spots from last year, and Cadillac and GMC round out this year's top gainers breaking into the top 15. Helping Cadillac's upward movement, the CTS Coupe was named the most reliable domestic car. Lincoln, Volvo and Chrysler join Ford on this year's biggest loser list.

Here are your 2016 North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists [w/polls]

Tue, Dec 8 2015

The 2016 Detroit Auto Show will kick off with the announcement of the annual North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year awards, and the three finalists in each category have just been revealed. Following this announcement, the jury – which includes Autoblog editor-in-chief Mike Austin – will re-evaluate each candidate before casting a final vote for the winner. This year's finalists are: Car of the Year Chevrolet Malibu Honda Civic Mazda MX-5 Miata Truck/Utility of the Year Honda Pilot Nissan Titan XD Volvo XC90 The 23rd annual awards will be announced on the morning of Monday, January 11. For now, we want to know where you stand. Let us know which vehicles you think should win, by voting in the polls below. Chevrolet Honda Mazda Nissan Volvo north american car of the year NACTOY

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.