2007 Volkswagen Passat 2.0t Wagon Luxury, Low Miles, Excellent Condition! on 2040-cars
Aspen, Colorado, United States
2007 VW Passat Wagon 2.0T
Luxury All maintenance is up to date! Title in Hand, MINT
condition, 2.0L turbocharged engine w/ 200HP, great mpg! LOW MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE! GREAT FIRST VEHICLE! 49011 miles AND COUNTING, (I use this as a daily driver, very few miles per day), 4 brand new
all-season tires (235/40R-18 Pirelli P6), new brakes, full service on
01/29/2014 LOADED! Luxury package,
Sport package ($5450.00), DYNAUDIO Premium Sound System ($1000), Leather
Package, DVD NAVIGATION SYSTEM ($1800), EQUIPEMENT PACKAGE ($1625) GPS Navigation, Sun roof, Garage and Gate Controls, Heated Seats, Steering Wheel Controls, Six-Disc CD Changer, Leather Seats, Rear Cargo Cover, Power Windows, 2 keys with remote entry, Factory manuals included, Cruise Control, Roof Rails, Memory Driver Seat, Rear Cargo Net included, Bi-Xenon Headlamps Contact: 970-404-0849 (Robert) for any questions you may have about this vehicle. This car is listed for sale locally in beautiful Aspen Colorado, and therefore I reserve the right to end this auction early, or at any time. You will not be disappointed with this car! |
Volkswagen Passat for Sale
2005 volkswagen passat tdi diesel(US $7,500.00)
2004 volkswagen passat 1.8l 30mpg!!!!(US $4,750.00)
2014 volkswagen passat se tsi 1.8l i4 turbo, leather, rear camera, loaded
No reserve premium wagon loaded super clean turbo leather moonroof alloys
Leather power driver seat alloys non smoker clean carfax we finance
1995 volkswagon passat new tires nice paint no rips in interior
Auto Services in Colorado
Weissach Performance ★★★★★
We are West Vail Shell ★★★★★
Vanatta Auto Electric ★★★★★
Tanner 4x4 Inc. ★★★★★
Sundance Automotive ★★★★★
Steffen Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
China sticking to its guns on EVs for the future
Mon, Apr 27 2015Automakers are obviously free to develop whatever next-gen, zero-emissions tech that they want. However, if a company wants to get on the good side of the Chinese government, that strategy better include some plug-in vehicles. The authorities there are lending major support to plug-ins at the moment, and its forcing the auto industry to play along. According to Bloomberg, Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, and BMW are all launching dedicated EV brands with their joint venture partners, and as many as 40 electric models could hit the Chinese market this year alone. However, analysts don't think the vehicles are going to sell well. Instead, the launches are essentially a way for companies to play nice with the government and help get the approval to build factories in the country. Take Toyota as an example. The company is pushing the future of hydrogen hard with promotional films for the Mirai and engineers talking down fast-charging EVs. Still, the Japanese automaker is getting ready to launch two EV brands in China with its joint venture partners, according to Bloomberg. China's push for alternative fuels has been happening for a while, but it really kicked into high gear last year. The government has set a goal to improve fleet-wide economy by 40 percent by the end of the decade in order to spend less importing oil and for the population's health. The plan has shown some success so far with hybrid and EV sales growing early in 2015. Related Video: News Source: BloombergImage Credit: Kin Cheung / AP Photo Government/Legal Green BMW Hyundai Toyota Volkswagen Green Culture Technology Electric tax incentives chinese government
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Carmakers ask Trump to revisit fuel efficiency rules
Mon, Feb 13 2017Car companies operating in the US are required to meet stringent fuel efficiency standards (a fleet average of 54.5MPG) through 2025, but they're hoping to loosen things now that President Trump is in town. Leaders from Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota and VW have sent a letter to Trump asking him to rethink the Obama administration's choice to lock in efficiency guidelines for the next several years. The car makers want to revisit the midterm review for the 2025 commitment in hopes of loosening the demands. They claim that the tougher requirements raise costs, don't match public buying habits and will supposedly put "as many a million" jobs up in the air. The Trump administration hasn't specifically responded to the letter, although Environmental Protection Agency nominee Scott Pruitt had said he would return to the Obama-era decision. The automakers' argument doesn't entirely hold up. While the EPA did estimate that the US would fall short of efficiency goals due to a shift toward SUVs and trucks, the job claims are questionable. Why would making more fuel efficient vehicles necessarily cost jobs instead of pushing companies to do better? As it is, even a successful attempt to loosen guidelines may only have a limited effect. All of the brands mentioned here are pushing for greater mainstream adoption of electric vehicles within the next few years -- they may meet the Obama administration's expectations just by shifting more drivers away from gas power. This article by Jon Fingas originally appeared on Engadget, your guide to this connected life. Related Video: News Source: ReutersImage Credit: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images Government/Legal Green Chrysler Fiat GM Honda Hyundai Nissan Toyota Volkswagen Fuel Efficiency CAFE standards Trump