2010 Volkswagen Cc Sport Sedan 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 2010
Number of Doors: 4
Make: Volkswagen
Mileage: 39,846
Model: CC
Sub Model: Sport
Trim: Sport Sedan 4-Door
Exterior Color: White Gold Metallic
Interior Color: Cornsilk Beige Two-toned interior
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Options: CD Player, V-Tex Leatherette seats, Heatable front seats, Premium 8 Touchscreen Radio w/in-dash 6 CD Changer, Bluetooth mobile telephone connectivity, Power central locking w/remote keyless locking
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Daytime running lights, Tire pressure monitoring system, Front and rear power assisted disc brakes
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Original owner. Purchased 11/27/2009 from Strong Volkswagen, Salt Lake City,UT. Maintenance work done by Strong Volkswagen. New tires purchased from Burt Brothers tire and service October 2012. There are a couple of dings near the rear trunk opening which should appear in attached photos. Body is in excellent shape otherwise. One fender bender in March 2013. Repaired by Ventura Body in Salt Lake City. No damage done to frame.
|
Volkswagen CC for Sale
11 vw cc 2.0t-29k-navigation-xm radio-back cam-heated seats-sunroof(US $17,995.00)
09 vw cc soprt-24k-sat radio ready-leather-heated seats-power seats(US $10,995.00)
11 cc lux, automatic, certified, navigation, free shipping!, we finance!(US $22,460.00)
Sport leather, power heated seats, 6-disc cd w/aux, 17
2009 volkswagen cc luxury sedan 4-door 2.0l(US $17,800.00)
2009 volkswagen passat cc vr6 4 motion, navigation,automatic,one owner! low resv
Auto Services in Utah
Westech Equipment ★★★★★
Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★
Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★
Secor Motors Inc ★★★★★
Rogers Automotive ★★★★★
Leavitt Automotive of Saint George ★★★★★
Auto blog
Top 10 small cars with the longest total driving range
Thu, Mar 19 2015Editor's Note: Since this article was originally posted in the spring of 2015, much has changed in the automotive landscape, especially among those shopping for small car economy. With thanks to Volkswagen for their blatant cheating – and subsequent cover-up – on diesel emissions, the largest player in the diesel passenger car segment isn't playing – they're paying; billions are going for both car buybacks and federally-imposed penalties. And for a few VW execs there exists the very real possibility of jail. With the absence of a big player and the abrupt entrance – via Chevy's new Bolt – of an affordable EV with 200+ miles of range, we've limited the diesel listings to Jaguar's new XE. And for those wanting an updated look at efficiency and range, Autoblog has it – or the EPA has it. Long before electric vehicles were part of the mainstream conversation, car lovers and skinflints alike would boast about the total range of their vehicles. There's something about getting farther down the road on one tank of gas that inflames the competitive spirit, almost as much as horsepower output or top speed. Of course, the vehicles with the very best range on today's market are almost all big trucks and SUVs; virtually all have the ability to carry massive reserves of fuel. Top up a standard Chevy Suburban and you can expect to travel almost 700 miles (you'll need to stop before the Suburban stops...), while a diesel-fed Jeep Grand Cherokee manages almost as many. But what about vehicles that are smaller? The EPA has, essentially, three classifications for 'small' vehicles: Minicompact, Subcompact and Compact. All three are measured based on interior volume, meaning that some cars with rather large exterior dimensions and engines slot in next to traditional small cars. But even though impressive GT coupes from Porsche, Bentley and Mercedes-Benz may have much larger gas tanks to feed their powerful engines, that capacity is offset by higher rates of consumption... in most cases. We used the EPA's Fuel Economy Guide for model year 2017 cars as a start, calculating the official highway miles per gallon rating with each vehicle's tank capacity. The resulting numbers aren't necessarily real world, but they do offer a spectrum for total theoretical range. The eventual top ten surprised me on a few occasions, and comprised quite a varied list of vehicles. 10.
Audi CVT suit settlement given green light, 64,000 cars covered
Mon, 07 Oct 2013Audi drivers, listen up. If you bought or leased a 2002-06 model-year A4 or A6 with a factory-installed Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) that failed, you may be entitled to reimbursement under a recently settled class-action lawsuit with corporate parent Volkswagen.
According to Automotive News, the settlement covers about 64,000 vehicles and alleges that "manufacturing and design problems caused the transmissions to fail and left owners stuck with repair costs." While the suit also argues Audi was aware of these issues (going so far as to hide that knowledge from consumers), the settlement stops short of acknowledging any wrongdoing by the German automaker.
Audi drivers are eligible for a cash reimbursement if their CVT repairs occurred within 10 years or 100,000 miles of the date they bought or leased the vehicle before June 19, 2013. To be eligible for compensation, drivers must submit a claim form (found here) with supporting documents by November 18.
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.046 s, 7835 u