Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Toyota Tundra 1794 on 2040-cars

US $50,448.00
Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Super White /
 Red Rock
Location:

6200 S 36th St, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

6200 S 36th St, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Unknown
Engine:Regular Unleaded V-8 5.7 L/346
Transmission:6-Speed
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5TFAW5F18EX380719
Stock Num: 380719
Make: Toyota
Model: Tundra 1794
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Super White
Interior Color: Red Rock
Options:
  • 4.300 Rear Diff
  • 4And7-Pin Connector
  • A-TracAndAuto Lsd
  • Abs W/ Electronic
  • AndSmart Stop Technology
  • Ball Mount,5 Inch Oval Chrome Step Tube,5.5' Double-Walled Bed W/ Rail Caps
  • Blind Spot Monitor With Rear Cross-Traffic Alert,1794 Grade Package: All Content Included As Standard Equipment
  • Brake Assist
  • Brake Force Distribution
  • Cntrl
  • DrAndFr Pass Advanced Airbag System
  • DrAndFr Pass Seat SideAndKnee Airbags
  • Driver ElrAndAlr/Elr For All Passengers
  • EngAndTrans Oil Cooler
  • Federal Emissions
  • Hvy Duty BattAndAlt
  • Ind Coil-Spring High-Mounted Double
  • Led Daytime Running Lights (Drl)
  • Manual Headlamp Level Control
  • Power-Assisted 4 Wheel Disc Brakes,6-Spd Automatic Trans W/Sequential Shift,20" Alloy Wheels W/ P275/55r20 Tires,5.7l I-Force V8 E85 Flex Fuel Dohc 32v
  • Pwr Tilt/Slide Moonroof W/ Sliding Shade
  • Rear Backup CameraAndParking Sonar
  • Roll-Sensing Curtain Airbags (Rsca),3-Point Seatbelts For All Positions With
  • Spray-On Bedliner
  • Star Safety System: Vehicle Stability
  • Tire Pressure Monitor System (Tpms)
  • Tow Hitch Rcvr
  • Tow/Haul Mode
  • Traction Cntrl
  • Trailer-Sway Control
  • Transfer Case
  • Trapezoidal Multi-Leaf Rear Suspension
  • Tripletech Frame
  • W/ Staggered Outboard Mounted Shocks
  • Wishbone Front Susp W/ Stabilizer Bar
  • With Dual Ind Vvt-I 381 Hp / 401 Lb-Ft,4wdemand Part-Time 4wd W/Elec Controlled
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Call Adam Nobles for daily specials.

Auto Services in Arkansas

Xpress Media Blasting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Sandblasting
Address: 3268B Albert Pike Rd, Hot-Springs
Phone: (501) 458-4242

White Motor Co Wrecker Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Cranes-Renting & Leasing
Address: 675 Eaton Rd, Madison
Phone: (870) 633-1000

Steve Smith Country Buick & GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6372 W Sunset Ave, Springdale
Phone: (479) 361-4654

Russell Paul Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Automobile Accessories
Address: Enola
Phone: (501) 354-8726

Quality Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Axles
Address: 1800 General Samuels Rd, Little-Rock-Afb
Phone: (501) 985-0449

Precision Autocare Of Heber Springs ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 30 Morrow Ln, Heber-Springs
Phone: (501) 362-2953

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Average transaction prices climb to a record $36,270 in January

Sat, Feb 3 2018

The automotive sector made a hash of the numbers last month, a mess of pluses and minuses clogging the transaction-price charts according to Kelley Blue Book. The overall industry rose one percent, even though buyers bought fewer cars and light vehicles in January 2018 vs 2017 using the selling-day adjusted rate. Due to January transaction prices rising to $36,270, a record for January, the value of new vehicles sold climbed more than $1 billion compared to January 2017. KBB's transaction prices don't include customer incentives, which changes the complexion slightly; average incentive spending rose to just over ten percent. The average transaction price in December 2017 was $36,756, so January dropped a bit - nothing unexpected, with the month annually blamed for "January doldrums." More revealing is the fact that the average transaction price in January 2017 was $34,910. This year's plumped-up figure came courtesy of the continued shift to crossovers, SUVs, and light trucks, which shouldn't surprise anyone who's read an automotive blog in the past 20 years. That category comprised nearly 70 percent of new vehicle sales for the month. Some manufacturers profited more than others, though. Fiat Chrysler managed 12.8 percent fewer sales in January compared year-on-year, but the company's vehicles sold for $1,300 more. The Ford brand suffered a 6.3-percent dip in sales, but brand transaction prices increased $2,000, while a Lincoln sold for $8,700 more on average. General Motors sold more cars and sold them for more money; overall GM transaction prices rose four percent, or $1,270, while a GMC traded hands for seven-percent more than in January 2017 and a Cadillac got $2,300 more on average. Of KBB's listed automakers, the Volkswagen Group got the most of out its customers, transaction prices rising at the German automaker by 5.6 percent to $42,243 in January 2018 compared to a year earlier. American Honda followed with a 4.3-percent increase to $28,991, GM in third at 4.1 percent to $40,313. Find your next car at Autoblog using our new and used car listings or the Car Finder tool. Broken out by segment, minivans rocked the table, transaction prices leaping by 7.9 percent to $35,380 compared to January a year earlier. Luxury cars boasted the next-highest rise, at 3.6 percent to $58,533.

Toyota found not at fault in alleged unintended acceleration crash

Fri, 11 Oct 2013

Toyota has already paid out millions and billions of dollars in settlements surrounding unintended acceleration, but the first lawsuit in the matter, which headed to a California court in July, has reached a verdict. Following the 2009 death of Noriko Uno, whose 2006 Camry was hit by another car and then sped out of control before crashing into a tree, the jury found that Toyota was not at fault in the crash.
Even though the 2006 Camry (shown above) wasn't involved in any of the unintended acceleration-related recalls and it was not equipped with a brake override, Automotive News reports that the jury's verdict says there was no defect in the car and actually blames the entire incident on the driver that ran into Uno's car - to the tune of $10 million. The accident started when the other driver ran a stop sign and hit Uno's car, and the report says that medical conditions (including diabetes) caused Uno to fail to stop her Camry.
The AN article also states that this lawsuit was a bellwether case for around 85 other personal-injury and wrongful-death suits against Toyota, but there are still many impending suits across the country. Scroll down for an official statement on this particular case from Toyota.