Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Fj40 Land Cruiser on 2040-cars

Year:1976 Mileage:11132 Color: Blue /
 Black
Location:

Midvale, Utah, United States

Midvale, Utah, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:400 chev turbo
Body Type:SUV
Engine:400 chevy small block
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: fj402277528 Year: 1976
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Land Cruiser
Trim: 2 dr
Drive Type: FWD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Mileage: 11,132
Sub Model: fj40
Exterior Color: Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

 1976 Fj 40 land cruiser for sale, small block 400 four bolt main recent rebuild has fender well headers  with a auto trans 400 chev turbo 400 bolted up to land cruiser transfer case.
engine has a hei distributor 600 holley 4 barrel adjustable 12 volt electric fan with a stock fan. the land cruiser has been rewired with a keep it clean wiring kit from under the dash  forward to the front.
Cd player. stock, fuel gauge, oil pressure temp gauge, work amp gauge doesn't. both seats are racing style seats but one is red and black 3r racing Naugahyde, other seat is black fabric racing seat seat covers new
inside of tub painted with rustoleum bed liner paint. rear or tub reskinned from top of tub down.
Rear window has cracks in it thinking about replacing with new laminated glass.
painted with Daytona  electric blue metallic urethane paint.
Tires are good with lots of tread left.
has a receiver style hitch that hooks to frame.
I also have a bikini style top with soft half doors in fair shape.
Sold As- Is

Auto Services in Utah

West Motor Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 296 N State St, Lewiston
Phone: (208) 656-4128

Utah Auto Gallery ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 23125 S State St, Salt-Lake-Cty
Phone: (801) 214-7146

Turn Key Service Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 4701 Commerce Dr, Salt-Lake-Cty
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Stevens Electric Motor Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Pumps-Service & Repair, Pumps
Address: 3198 S West Temple, W-Valley-City
Phone: (877) 785-4743

South Towne Collison ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9356 S 500 W, Sandy
Phone: (801) 748-2596

Roses Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 161 Gordon Ln, South-Salt-Lake
Phone: (801) 895-4326

Auto blog

Airbag recall widens to include BMW, Chrysler, Ford and Toyota

Mon, 23 Jun 2014

The recall of faulty airbag inflators supplied by Takata has exploded today to grow to seven automakers. In most cases, only models in certain high-humidity regions were affected because the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found in its investigation that moisture played a roll in determining whether there would be a problem. However, some companies opted for national campaigns. The exact number of affected models for these campaigns isn't yet known at this time.
BMW is recalling an undisclosed number of 325i, 325Xi, 330i and 330Xi models from the 2001 through 2005 model years and the 2001-2006 model year versions of the 325Ci and 330Ci for the driver side and passenger side inflators. Only vehicles currently registered in Florida, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and the US Virgin Islands are covered under this recall.
Neither Chrysler's filing with NHTSA nor its press release list the specific models affected, but a company spokesperson told Autoblog that at this time it only covers the driver and passenger side inflators for the 2006 Dodge Charger in Florida, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and the US Virgin Islands

BMW tops Consumer Reports 2023 Brand Report Card

Thu, Feb 16 2023

Feels like we wrote about Consumer Reports' 2022 Brand Report Car and 10 Top Picks a few weeks ago, but it was last April. So the mag is back with a ranked roster of 32 brands and 10 vehicles in four categories for your debating pleasure. Starting with the brands, last year's top three were Subaru, Mazda and BMW. This year, the Munich crew climbed two spots to win the prize thanks to "Superb road test scores and solid results in CR’s reliability and owner satisfaction surveys." Subaru narrowly fell to second, maintaining its four-year run in the top three. Mini, eighth last year, jumped five spots to get the last step on the podium. The rest of the top 10 were Lexus (up one spot from last year), Honda (down one spot from last year), Toyota (up three), Genesis (up 12), Mazda (down six), Audi (down three) and Kia (up eight). The magazine and testing outfit says its Brand Report Card "[reveals] which automakers are producing the most well-performing, safe, and reliable vehicles based on CRÂ’s independent testing and member surveys," and that "Brands that rise to the top tend to have the most consistent performance across their model lineups." Last year's top 10 had six automakers from Japan, three from Germany (giving Mini credit for England), none from the U.S. or South Korea, and five luxury brands. This year's list counts five makes from Japan, two from Germany because Porsche fell out of the top ten, two from South Korea, still none from the U.S., and four luxury brands. Buick again ranked as the best domestic, dropping to 12th after being 11th last year. The big mover was Lincoln, its 10-place jump up to 16th attributed to better reliability from the Corsair and Nautilus. Tesla's improved overall reliability saw it climb six spots to 17th. Dodge climbed one spot to 15th. Jeep got out of the penalty box in last to come second-to-last. Land Rover fell three places into the penalty spot.  CR's top 10 vehicle models The 10 Top Picks list is practically a new list. Only two holdovers made it to 2023, those being the Subaru Forester and Kia Telluride.

IIHS: Drivers safer than passengers in frontal crash test

Thu, Jun 23 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced a small overlap frontal crash test in 2012 that replicates what happens when the front corner of a car impacts another object. In the test, vehicles travel at a speed of 40 mph toward a five-foot-tall barrier with 25 percent of the total width of the car striking the barrier on the driver side. One would assume that vehicles with good small overlap front ratings would protect the driver and the passenger equally. But a recent study from the IIHS proves that passengers aren't as protected as drivers. The IIHS conducted the test on seven small SUVs with good driver-side small overlap ratings and only one of the vehicles, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, performed well enough to be given a good rating. The other SUVs performance ranged from poor to acceptable. After reviewing the results of the test, the IIHS is deliberating whether it should institute a passenger-side rating as part of its Top Safety Pick criteria. "This is an important aspect of occupant protection that needs more attention," states Becky Mueller, lead author of the study and an IIHS senior research engineer. "More than 1,600 right-front passengers died in frontal crashes in 2014." Since the small overlap front test was introduced, 13 automakers have made structural changes to 97 vehicles with roughly three-quarters earning a good rating after the adjustments. The IIHS' test for frontal ratings is completed with a dummy in the driver's seat and with a barrier overlapping the driver's side. Which makes sense, as passengers aren't always riding in a vehicle. "It's not surprising that automakers would focus their initial efforts to improve small overlap protection on the side of the vehicle that we conduct the tests on," states David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer. "In fact, we encouraged them to do that in the short term if it mean they could quickly make driver-side improvements to more vehicles. As time goes by, though, we would hope they ensure similar levels of protection on both sides." As the IIHS' test revealed, there's a massive difference in safety between the two front seats. Increase passenger safety, according to Mueller, would require automakers to strengthen the occupant compartment by using a different type of material or by making it thicker.