1989 Toyota 4runner Sr5 Sport Utility 2-door 3.0l on 2040-cars
Chula Vista, California, United States
i'm selling my 1989 toyota 4 runner 3.o v6,5 speed runs great you can drive any were you want,new tires 125k miles driving time, 286k miles for been tow behind a motor home, clean title,clean interior no oil leaks,or rust is been in san diego ca,since new,original power train.i have the right to end this auction at any time.no pay pal cash only.....thank you....for looking......
|
Toyota 4Runner for Sale
- 2008 toyota 4runner sr5 leather interior(US $16,500.00)
- 2005 toyota 4runner sr5 sport edition, v8,4 wheel drive,
- 2008 limited used 4l v6 24v 4wd suv
- 1987 toyota 4runner, 4 wheel drive, sr5,restored
- Toytoa 4runner sr5 suv(US $10,000.00)
- 04 toyota 4 runner sr5-sport edition 62345 miles no accidents leather(US $14,500.00)
Auto Services in California
Yoshi Car Specialist Inc ★★★★★
WReX Performance - Subaru Service & Repair ★★★★★
Windshield Pros ★★★★★
Western Collision Works ★★★★★
West Coast Tint and Screens ★★★★★
West Coast Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Audi, Toyota land on MIT's list of 50 Most Disruptive Companies
Sat, 23 Feb 2013MIT Technology Review, a magazine all about innovation, has announced its list of the 50 most disruptive companies in 2013, and both Audi and Toyota made the cut. While the term "most disruptive" may carry a negative connotation in most uses (especially in the classroom), the acknowledgement in this case is an accolade, signifying that the company is at the forefront of its industry. In a nutshell, a disruptive company is a business whose innovations force other businesses to alter their strategic direction.
Audi made the list for "pushing autonomous cars closer to fruition with a laser-scanning road detector that fits in a vehicle's front grille," and Toyota for "expanding its dominance of the hybrid-car market with its new plug-in version of the Prius." Click on the image above to be taken to the original graphic at MIT Technology Review, where clickable colored squares reveal information about each of the 50 winners, compiled from a variety of industries.
GM, Audi, Jaguar halt Russian sales amidst ruble's collapse
Fri, Dec 19 2014The value of Russia's ruble currency has sunk like a stone tossed in the Volga for much of the year, losing over 40 percent of its worth since June. The change is having bizarre effects on the auto industry there and leaving some automakers scrambling to adjust. According to Bloomberg, Russians are buying up luxury goods including automobiles at the moment to have a physical investment in case the ruble sinks further. However, with the money worth so little, the companies aren't making much from these transactions. Things are so dire that several automakers are temporarily ending deliveries until the situation stabilizes. According to Bloomberg, General Motors stopped sales on December 16 with no set date to start again. Audi did the same thing but with the intention to resume once it has adjusted model pricing. Jaguar Land Rover terminated business until December 19 to see how things changed. Toyota is increasing its pricing, as well, but keeping business open at the same time. Some automakers have subtly been reacting to the slumping Russian auto market all year. The moves have included Volkswagen cutting production by 30,000 units from its factory in Kaluga. Ford also got rid of 950 workers from two plants due to low demand. Some analysts have even speculated that the contracting industry and possibility of lower import duties into the country could cause companies to end their manufacturing in Russia completely.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.