2019 Tesla Model 3 on 2040-cars
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clean
Engine:Electric
Fuel Type:Electric
Year: 2019
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5YJ3E1EB9KF199729
Mileage: 26340
Model: Model 3
Exterior Color: White
Make: Tesla
Drive Type: AWD
Tesla Model 3 for Sale
2019 tesla model 3 performance awd 1-owner(US $27,980.00)
2018 tesla model 3 long range(US $18,671.10)
2023 tesla model 3(US $15,625.00)
2022 tesla model 3 long range dual motor all-wheel drive(US $22,314.60)
2023 tesla model 3(US $19,700.00)
2023 tesla model 3 rear-wheel drive(US $18,419.80)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Valley Tire Co Inc ★★★★★
Trinity Automotive ★★★★★
Total Lube Center Plus ★★★★★
Tim Howard Auto Repair ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Spina & Adams Collision Svc ★★★★★
Auto blog
California grants Tesla $34.7 million tax break to boost production
Wed, 18 Dec 2013Tesla Motors' plans to expand just got a big boost, as the state of California has announced it will give the Palo Alto-based company a $34.7 million tax break to increase its production capacity. The EV manufacturer is being given a pass on sales and use taxes on up to $415 million worth of equipment, according to a report on the San Francisco Chronicle's website.
Tesla is currently on track to produce 21,500 cars, although the planned expansion should more than double that capacity to 56,500 units, adding 112 jobs at Tesla's Fremont factory. "I'm pleased we could take this action to encourage Tesla to expand its electric vehicle production in California, which will create green jobs and improve our air quality," State Treasurer Bill Lockyer said. The state estimates that between the additional jobs and (hoped for) increase in sales, it will recoup the costs of the tax break in more taxes.
Tesla spies something that begins with the letter D
Thu, 02 Oct 2014Lest there be any doubt to the contrary, Tesla is a company on the move. Following the sensational Tesla Roadster, the Model S is now humming down roads across the country and around the world. And there's more to come: the entry-level Model 3, the upcoming Model X crossover... and something else. Two somethings, to be precise, going by this latest, cryptic tweet from Tesla chief Elon Musk.
The image enclosed appears to show the front of a Model S peering out from under a partially open garage door emblazoned with the letter D. Just what that letter stands for, we don't know. Usually we'd guess it stood for "diesel," but given that Teslas are powered purely by electricity, that'd probably be viewed as a backwards step. Drive? Possibly, if Tesla has an all-wheel-drive sedan in the works (which is does).
Whatever it is, we'll have to wait until October 9 before Tesla reveals the full thing. At that point it will also reveal "something else," though it's given even less indication as to what that might be. The Model 3? Production-ready Model X? A new Roadster? We'll find out in a week's time.
NHTSA denies Tesla asked for Model S fire probe
Wed, 20 Nov 2013The Tesla Model S is being investigated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration after three of the models caught fire; two of the electric cars impacted debris on the road, and one was involved in a single-car accident. This much we know for sure. Just exactly how the investigation came to be, though, is up for debate.
According to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the California-based automaker requested that the government safety agency open the investigation, saying in a blog post, "We have requested that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conduct a full investigation as soon as possible into the fire incidents. While we think it is highly unlikely, if something is discovered that would result in a material improvement in occupant fire safety, we will immediately apply that change to new cars and offer it as a free retrofit to all existing cars."
Not so fast, counters NHTSA head David Strickland. Speaking to The Detroit News, Strickland had this to say: "Investigations are independent... We have never ... actually had an automaker ask for a formal investigation, but it causes a couple of implications: If a manufacturer asks me or asks the agency for a formal investigation, you've already made a determination that you may have a defect that imposes an unreasonable risk to safety. ... I don't think that would ever happen."