2019 Model 3 2019 Long Range Autopilot Nav Pano Blind 55k on 2040-cars
Vehicle Title:Clean
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:Electric 283hp 317ft. lbs.
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5YJ3E1EA2KF324206
Mileage: 55760
Warranty: No
Model: Model 3
Fuel: Electric
Drivetrain: RWD
Sub Model: 2019 Long Range AUTOPILOT NAV PANO BLIND 55K
Trim: 2019 Long Range AUTOPILOT NAV PANO BLIND 55K
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Solid Black
Interior Color: Black
Make: Tesla
Tesla Model 3 for Sale
2023 tesla model 3 rear-wheel drive(US $18,770.50)
2022 tesla model 3(US $33,995.00)
2021 tesla model 3 long range dual motor all-wheel drive(US $20,580.00)
2023 tesla model 3 rear-wheel drive(US $20,570.90)
2023 tesla model 3(US $26,900.00)
2022 tesla model 3 long range(US $31,995.00)
Auto blog
Honda Ridgeline, Ford Ecosport and Tesla profits | Autoblog Podcast #537
Thu, Apr 19 2018On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Green Editor John Beltz Snyder and Associate Editor Joel Stocksdale. We talk about driving the 2018 Ford Ecosport and Hyundai Accent. Joel tells us why he loves the naturally aspirated engine in our long-term Honda Ridgeline. We discuss Tesla's profitability claims, Johan de Nysschen leaving Cadillac and a possible date change for the Detroit Auto Show. As usual, we'll also spend a listener's money on a car. Autoblog Podcast #537 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Driving the 2018 Ford Ecosport Driving the 2018 Hyundai Accent A love letter to the Honda Ridgeline's V6 Leadership change at Cadillac Will Tesla be profitable this year? Will NAIAS move to October? Spend my money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Earnings/Financials Green Podcasts Detroit Auto Show Cadillac Ford Honda Hyundai Tesla Used Car Buying Truck Crossover SUV Economy Cars Electric Sedan
CARB scrapping plan for $60,000 limit on EV rebates
Wed, May 21 2014In April, we heard about a discussion within the California Air Resources Board (CARB) that would have put a $60,000 MSRP limit on plug-in vehicles that would qualify for CARB's $2,500 rebates. A new report in Silicon Beat says that CARB is once again ready to give EV money to everyone, no matter what expensive car they buy. There's no question that the CARB proposal would have had an inordinate effect on Tesla Motors, the only company selling a EV expensive enough to cost more than $60,000, the Tesla Model S. Okay, the Cadillac ELR plug-in hybrid would also have been affected, but that only would have applied to a small handful of people. According to Silicon Beat, the updated CARB proposal says clearly that, "at this time staff is not proposing any significant changes to the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project as part of this year's Initial Funding Plan." CARB spokesman David Clegern told Silicon Beat that, "It's fair to say [the $60,000 limit] been removed. I never say anything is dead until after the vote, but I'm not aware of any plans to revisit it." In other words, Tesla, you're good to go. We've asked CARB for confirmation of this, but have not yet heard back.
Feds decide against investigating Tesla Model S fire
Fri, 25 Oct 2013Despite earlier reports, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced it will not be filing a formal investigation into the fire that engulfed a Tesla Model S earlier this month, as the agency says there was no evidence to suggest the fire was due to a manufacturer defect or that the car was in violation of government-mandated safety standards, according to Automotive News.
The NHTSA's decision whether to investigate was delayed, as the fire happened on the first day of the US government shutdown. AN reports that as of October 22, the administration was still "gathering data," according to a statement by Administrator David Strickland.
The October 1 fire that torched the critically acclaimed EV was started after an impact with a "large metallic object," according to multiple sources including the driver/owner. As we reported on October 3, despite the car-destroying blaze, Tesla maintained that the battery pack acted exactly as designed, by containing the blaze to just one of the battery pack's 16 modules, rather than sending the whole lithium-ion unit up in flames.























