2001 Saturn Sl on 2040-cars
Whitefield, New Hampshire, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:L4
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Saturn
Model: S-Series
Trim: 4 DOOR
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 999,999
Number of Doors: 4
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
Saturn S-Series for Sale
- 1997 saturn sl2 base sedan 4-door 1.9l original owner(US $2,000.00)
- 2000 saturn s-series sw1 right hand drive postal vehicle great condition!
- 1998 saturn sl2 four door sedan
- 99 saturn sl2 - no reserve - twin cam 4 cyl - 5-spd - fuel saver
- No reserve--saturn twin cam wagon-- 5 speed-- saftey package---nearly new tires
- 1993 saturn sl2 base sedan 4-door 1.9l
Auto Services in New Hampshire
Woodstock Sunoco Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Town Line Motors Of Orange ★★★★★
Tenares Auto Repair ★★★★★
Monro Muffler Brake & Service ★★★★★
Marc Motors ★★★★★
Early & Sons Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
First GM ignition switch trial dismissed
Fri, Jan 22 2016Robert Scheuer has agreed to dismiss his ignition switch claims against General Motors to bring a sudden stop to the first federal trial over the automaker's faulty parts. The lawsuit was the first of six cases that were a bellwether to set a precedent in the complaints. Scheuer didn't receive any financial settlement from GM, according to Reuters. Scheuer alleged that he was injured when his 2003 Saturn Ion went off the road and hit the tree. The airbag didn't deploy, which Scheuer claimed was the result of the faulty ignition switch. GM originally attempted to dismiss the trial over a lack of evidence, but US District Judge Jesse Furman set a January 11 start date for the case. During the trial, GM's attorneys accused Scheuer and his wife of lying and presented evidence of an allegedly altered check stub that they used to purchase a house. Scheuer's defense had claimed that the family was evicted from the home after memory loss from the accident caused Robert to lose the down payment check. After the allegations, Furman pushed for a settlement. He called the trial an "outlier" and "almost worthless as a bellwether case," according to Bloomberg. The next of the six trials begins in March, Reuters reports. Related Video:
NHTSA could add 1M cars to GM recall
Wed, 13 Mar 2013
The Detroit Free Press is reporting that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration may expand a recall campaign for faulty brake lamps. The agency is currently looking into complaints that certain 2004-2011 Chevrolet Malibu models as well as some 2007-2009 Saturn Aura sedans may have brake lights that do not illuminate when the driver presses the pedal. Alternatively, the lamps may also illuminate without input from the driver. General Motors recalled 8,000 Pontiac G6 models from the 2005 model year for the same problem, and NHTSA is currently investigating whether to add 550,000 more G6 models built between 2005 and 2009 to the list for the same issue.
In addition, investigators are currently examining 97 complaints from Malibu and Aura owners with the same trouble. If NHTSA adds those models to the recall campaign, more than one million units could be covered. GM, meanwhile, says there have been no accidents or injuries as a result of the problem.
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.