Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Saturn Ion Only 84,000 Miles Clean ! Ready To Go No Reserve Nr on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:84930
Location:

Williamstown, New Jersey, United States

Williamstown, New Jersey, United States

 2005 Saturn ION in very good condition
everything works - ready to go
cold AC
Clean inside and out
minor scratches on rear bumper
good tires - front and rear - 2 front tires match + 2 rear tires match ( 2 pairs)
am/fm/cd player works but sometimes display fading  but that does not interrupt the sound
(i can put in different cd player in per request and for extra $ after full payment)
car comes with pa reconstructed (rebuilt) title - ready to register
(rear bumper is from another ION and rear right quarter panel -
minor right rear corner collision- i have "before" pictures if you want to see them)

If you win this car - i required $250 deposit in 24 hrs after auction ends
Can deliver this car up to 150 miles - $2 per loaded mile
delivery only after cleared full payment
Car sold as-is - no returns - no complains
Please stop by and check it out  yourself
email me - we will set appointment when you can see it
ask any question - i will answer - usually in 12-24hrs
 

Auto Services in New Jersey

Zp Auto Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 372 Lafayette St, Kearny
Phone: (212) 995-2377

World Automotive Transmissions II ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 453 Van Houten Ave, Garfield
Phone: (973) 471-5505

Voorhees Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 210 Cherry St, Audubon
Phone: (856) 354-8840

Vip Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 700 US Highway 22, Califon
Phone: (908) 753-1500

Total Performance Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 18 Ramapo Valley Rd, Wyckoff
Phone: (201) 529-4353

Tony`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: New-Gretna
Phone: (856) 661-0077

Auto blog

First GM ignition switch trial dismissed

Fri, Jan 22 2016

Robert Scheuer has agreed to dismiss his ignition switch claims against General Motors to bring a sudden stop to the first federal trial over the automaker's faulty parts. The lawsuit was the first of six cases that were a bellwether to set a precedent in the complaints. Scheuer didn't receive any financial settlement from GM, according to Reuters. Scheuer alleged that he was injured when his 2003 Saturn Ion went off the road and hit the tree. The airbag didn't deploy, which Scheuer claimed was the result of the faulty ignition switch. GM originally attempted to dismiss the trial over a lack of evidence, but US District Judge Jesse Furman set a January 11 start date for the case. During the trial, GM's attorneys accused Scheuer and his wife of lying and presented evidence of an allegedly altered check stub that they used to purchase a house. Scheuer's defense had claimed that the family was evicted from the home after memory loss from the accident caused Robert to lose the down payment check. After the allegations, Furman pushed for a settlement. He called the trial an "outlier" and "almost worthless as a bellwether case," according to Bloomberg. The next of the six trials begins in March, Reuters reports. Related Video:

Recalled Saturn Ion facing separate federal safety probe

Fri, 21 Mar 2014

General Motors may be staring down another recall campaign for one of its models already embroiled in its high-profile ignition recall. The 2003-2007 Saturn Ion is already among the 1.6-million vehicles being recalled for faulty ignition switches, and now new light is being shed on a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation over 2004-2007 models centering on a loss of power steering.
The government safety regulator has received 846 complaints about the problem and claims that GM has had 3,489 reports of failure. Of those cases, there have been 16 accidents and 2 injuries reported, according to Automotive News. While NHTSA has been conducting an investigation since September 2011, no recall has been issued yet.
The inquiry's length was brought to light by an organization called the National Legal and Policy Center that alleges GM and NHTSA have known about the problem but are delaying a recall. It has sent a letter to CEO Mary Barra asking "to recall Saturn Ions for the model years 2004 through 2007 without further delay." The letter in question is available in full on the group's website.

US database may have overstated deaths in GM ignition switch recall

Fri, Mar 14 2014

The FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy. Earlier today, we reported that the actual death toll attributable to GM's ignition switch problem had crested the 300 mark according to new research, well up from the original reports of 12 to 13 deaths. Now, word is breaking that the US government database that informed the study that the report was based on may have significantly overstated the correlation between the study and the GM recall. The initial study was conducted by Friedman Research on behalf of the Center for Auto Safety, and used something called the US Fatality Analysis Reporting System. To recap, the study claimed that over a 10-year period, 303 people were killed in Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion coupes and sedans when their airbags failed to deploy. These undeployed airbags were then linked to GM's ignition switch recall, which as we've explained before, can turn the ignition out of the "run" position and into the "off" or "accessory" position, disabling the airbags in the process. Now, according to a report from The Detroit News, which cites research from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Study Center for Trauma and EMS at the University of Maryland, the FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents in conditions where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy (which isn't to say crashes and deaths weren't caused by loss of control from the ignition switching off in the GM vehicles). According to the report, this was a significant number of the cases. There is another potential problem, too. According to that same report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration uses both FARS and another database on fatalities, called the National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). Where FARS uses what the DetNews calls "not always reliable" police data to record vehicular deaths within 30 days of a crash, NASS/CDS relies on what's known as a probability sample. It collects data on 5,000 crashes each year – including some found in the FARS database – to calculate a probability figure. According to a 2009 IIHS study, "Among crashes common to both databases, NASS/CDS reported deployments for 45 percent of front occupant deaths for which FARS had coded nondeployments." In plain English, FARS doesn't provide a reliable count airbag deployments.