1987 Porsche 928 on 2040-cars
Rutland, Illinois, United States
If you have more questions or want more details please email : sonjasmmas@ukhot.com .
1987 Porsche 928 S4 , sought after manual transmission, Guards Red with Black interior. Very clean car, 33,253
miles. New battery installed a couple months ago, good running condition, clean car fax, no known issues, power
windows, locks, sunroof, all working order. All books, manuals, spare tire, tools service records included. I've
sold 3 personal collectible cars in the last couple months, 2 little kids and not enough time to enjoy the cars so
going for higher end but less of them to enjoy once in a while. Car is in Chicago, take a look or send some one to
take it home, you will enjoy it! Please ask any questions I will do the best to answer them, see my feedback as
well, no issues and I have had numerous cars bought and sold for MYSELF only over the years with no negative
feedback. I try to be as upfront as possible about as much as I can tell you.
Thank you for the interest !
Serviced at 32,562 oil and filter, Brakes flushed, trans service , rear diff service, New front brake pads and
sensors. Retension timing belt , it was replaced by previous owner.
Serviced at 33,189 AC recharged , two dash board sensors replaced. New master cylinder replaced.
Lamborghini , ferrari, aston martin, bmw, mercedes, lexus, 930 911 968 912 944
Porsche 928 for Sale
- 1987 porsche 928(US $9,000.00)
- 1986 porsche 928(US $7,700.00)
- 1989 porsche 928(US $2,900.00)
- 1984 porsche 928 s(US $7,500.00)
- 1995 porsche 928 928 gts 5 speed(US $22,500.00)
- 1986 porsche 928 s(US $13,000.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Webb Chevrolet ★★★★★
Wally`s Collision Center ★★★★★
Twin City Upholstery Ltd. ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Towing St. Louis ★★★★★
Suburban Wheel Cover Co ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports says infotainment systems 'growing first-year reliability plague'
Mon, 27 Oct 2014The Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability Survey (right) is out, and the top two spots look much the same as last year's list with Lexus and Toyota in first and second place, respectively. However, there are some major shakeups for 2014, with Acura plunging eight spots from third in 2013 to 11th this year, and Mazda replaces it on the lowest step of the podium. Honda and Audi round out the top five. This year's list includes six Japanese brands in the top 10, two Europeans, one America and one Korean.
Acura isn't the only one taking a tumble, though. Infiniti is the biggest loser this year by dropping 14 spots to 20th place. Other big losses come from Mercedes-Benz with an 11-place fall to 24th, and GMC, which declines 10 positions to 19th.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, it's not traditional mechanical bugs hauling down these automaker's reliability scores. Instead, pesky problems with infotainment systems are taking a series toll on the rankings. According to Consumer Reports, complaints about "in-car electronics" were the most grumbled about element in new cars. Problem areas included things like unresponsive touchscreens, issues pairing phones and multi-use controllers that refused to work right.
Mercedes-AMG GT vs. Porsche 911 [w/poll]
Thu, 11 Sep 2014Mercedes-Benz designed the AMG GT to compete head-on with the Porsche 911. It's a clear, singular purpose, and Benz brings a lot of money, technology and race-bred expertise to the fight.
The AMG GT is Merc's followup to the awesome SLS AMG, the retro-modern, gullwing-doored coupe that took us by storm half a decade ago. But this new GT coupe is a more focused sports car than the SLS, rather than an all out supercar capable of extreme performance. It's got a brand-new V8 engine, and state-of-the-art technology that help it to not only be a proper Mercedes, but to be a serious performer.
Mercedes will sell its new baby in two models. The GT S arrives first, in spring 2015, followed by the standard GT in mid-2016. Of course, there's room to grow from there. And while Porsche may have already expanded its 911 range to include a vast variety of models, here's how Stuttgart's icon stacks up against Affalterbach's bad boy.
Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move
Tue, Dec 6 2016With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.