2014 Porsche 911 on 2040-cars
San Antonio, Texas, United States
If you have any questions feel free to email me at: katheyksshamsiddeen@crewefans.com .
2014 911 Turbo S Coupe in perfect condition! This car is being sold by the original owner, nonsmoker, always
garaged, and a clean Carfax. There is no lien on the car.
Original window sticker of $196755! The car comes with Porsche's list of standard features plus the following
options:
911 Turbo S ($181100)
Dark blue metallic color ($0)
Natural leather interior in Espresso ($1080)
Seat heating (front) ($0)
Adaptive cruise control including Porsche active safe ($2490)
Seat ventilation (front) ($840)
Light design package ($510)
ParkAssist (front and rear) including reversing camera ($655)
Electric slide/tilt sunroof in glass ($1990)
Power steering plus ($270)
Power folding side mirrors ($0)
Rear footwell lighting ($430)
Sport chrono clock dial in Racing Yellow ($500)
Instrument dials in Racing Yellow ($860)
Burmester high-end infotainment package ($3500)
Mahogany interior package ($0)
Heated multifunction steering wheel in mahogany ($635)
Center console trim in mahogany ($0)
Door-sill guards in stainless steel, illuminated ($900)
Additional information:
The car was driven in only one rain shower and that was on its way home from the dealer after its first and only
oil change. At purchase, the dealer applied Xpel's Ultimate Paint Protection Film to the entire car. This film cost
$1795 and carries a 10 year warranty. The purpose of mentioning the film in this advertisement is to inform
potential buyers that there is one damaged area in this film. The damaged area is a scrape in the film on the front
of the car, which was caused by a removable front license plate holder. In looking carefully at this area using a
bright light and a magnifying glass, there appears to be no scratch whatsoever in the paint of the car. In
addition, there is a 1" long by 1/32" wide area under the film on the driver's door that is discolored. There is no
damage to the film at this spot and the discolored area does not appear to be a scratch, but rather, appears to be
a smudge of some type that would wash off if the film was removed.
Porsche 911 for Sale
- 1991 porsche 911(US $66,000.00)
- 1984 porsche 911(US $17,300.00)
- 1989 porsche 911(US $61,000.00)
- 1998 porsche 911 c2s(US $70,900.00)
- 1993 porsche 911(US $43,300.00)
- 1997 porsche 911 993(US $11,500.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Z`s Auto & Muffler No 5 ★★★★★
Wright Touch Mobile Oil & Lube ★★★★★
Worwind Automotive Repair ★★★★★
V T Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tyler Ford ★★★★★
Triple A Autosale ★★★★★
Auto blog
J.D. Power: Vehicle dependability at all-time high, Lexus and Porsche lead
Wed, 13 Feb 2013
Each year, J.D. Power and Associates surveys original owners of three-year-old vehicles to find out what kinds of problems they have had experienced over the last 12 months, and then it uses this data to create its annual Vehicle Dependability Study. This means that the models in the 2013 study are 2010 model year vehicles, and J.D. Power rates each make as well as the top individual models based on how many problems were experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100).
Debunking the idea that carryover models are more dependable than new or updated models, the 2013 study found that the average carryover model experienced 133 PP100, while all-new or redesigned vehicles for the 2010 model year had 116 PP100; vehicles that received minor changes fared the best with just 111 PP100. The overall average for all makes was 126 PP100, which is the lowest figure since the findings were first issued in 1989.
What do J.D. Power's quality ratings really measure?
Wed, Jun 24 2015Check these recently released J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) results. Do they raise any questions in your mind? Premium sports-car maker Porsche sits in first place for the third straight year, so are Porsches really the best-built cars in the U.S. market? Korean brands Kia and Hyundai are second and fourth, so are Korean vehicles suddenly better than their US, European, and Japanese competitors? Are workaday Chevrolets (seventh place) better than premium Buicks (11th), and Buicks better than luxury Cadillacs (21st), even though all are assembled in General Motors plants with the same processes and many shared parts? Are Japanese Acuras (26th) worse than German Volkswagens (24th)? And is "quality" really what it used to be (and what most perceive it to be), a measure of build excellence? Or has it evolved into much more a measure of likeability and ease of use? To properly analyze these widely watched results, we must first understand what IQS actually studies, and what the numerical scores really mean. First, as its name indicates, it's all about "initial" quality, measured by problems reported by new-vehicle owners in their first 90 days of ownership. If something breaks or falls off four months in, it doesn't count here. Second, the scores are problems per 100 vehicles, or PP100. So Power's 2015 IQS industry average of 112 PP100 translates to just 1.12 reported problems per vehicle. Third, no attempt is made to differentiate BIG problems from minor ones. Thus a transmission or engine failure counts the same as a squeaky glove box door, tricky phone pairing, inconsistent voice recognition, or anything else that annoys the owner. Traditionally, a high-quality vehicle is one that is well-bolted together. It doesn't leak, squeak, rattle, shed parts, show gaps between panels, or break down and leave you stranded. By this standard, there are very few poor-quality new vehicles in today's U.S. market. But what "quality" should not mean, is subjective likeability: ease of operation of the radio, climate controls, or seat adjusters, phone pairing, music downloading, sizes of touch pads on an infotainment screen, quickness of system response, or accuracy of voice-recognition. These are ergonomic "human factors" issues, not "quality" problems. Yet these kinds of pleasability issues are now dominating today's JDP "quality" ratings.
Weekly Recap: Ferrari, Ford and Porsche power up for Geneva
Sat, Feb 7 2015Monday was Groundhog Day. Tuesday, apparently, was Sports Car Day. The Ferrari 488 GTB, the Ford Focus RS and the Porsche Cayman GT4 all debuted within hours of each other ahead of their rollouts at the Geneva Motor Show. Three sporty machines, three vastly different approaches – and a lot of implications for enthusiasts. That's a day worth repeating. It also illustrates the opportunities automakers see in the performance market, which is expected to grow in the coming years. Ford estimates the segment has expanded 14 percent in Europe and surged 70 percent in North America since 2009. The Detroit Auto Show was evidence of this, and performance cars of every stripe debuted, including the Acura NSX, Ford GT, Alfa Romeo 4C Spider and several others. This isn't a fad. Performance cars aren't going away. The question is why? Stricter CAFE standards are looming in the United States, as are tighter emissions regulations in Europe. And no one expects gas prices to remain low in America. None of this matters for sports cars, and automakers are increasingly using them to elevate their images. That's why Dodge rolled out two 707-horsepower Hellcats last year. It's why Ford has decided to resurrect the GT for road and track. It's why in the depths of bankruptcy, General Motors continued work on the Chevrolet Corvette Stingray, not to mention the Z06. "Great brands are made one car at a time," Ford of Europe president Jim Farley said at the reveal of the Focus RS. Still, companies make those cars for different reasons. View 5 Photos Mainstream brands like Ford and Dodge want to build cars that get people talking, excite their bases and drive more potential customers into the showroom. They probably don't buy a Focus RS or a Hellcat, but suddenly the regular Focus hatch looks a bit hotter, and that V6 Charger seems to be just a touch more muscular. The halo of performance is alive and well in the eyes of automakers and their customers. "It's one of the most effective catalysts for ingenuity and innovation," said Joe Bakaj, vice president of product development for Ford of Europe. That also leads to a trickle-down effect. Some of the technologies inevitably make their way to other products. It's hard to think the new all-wheel-drive system in the Focus RS that distributes torque front to rear and side to side won't be used in other vehicles. It's different for Ferrari and Porsche.