Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Nissan 2.0 S on 2040-cars

Year:2011 Mileage:30638
Location:

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Auto Services in New York

Walton Service Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1634 State Route 54, Bluff-Point
Phone: (315) 536-6928

Vitali Auto Exchange ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 236 Main St, Owego
Phone: (607) 797-7900

Vision Hyundai of Canandaigua ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2440 Rochester Rd Rte 332, Bloomfield
Phone: (585) 394-3800

Tony B`s Tire & Automotive Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 684 Main St, Port-Crane
Phone: (607) 729-8670

Steve`s Complete Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 425 E John St, Wyandanch
Phone: (631) 669-2189

Steve`s Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6060 Route 353, Otto
Phone: (716) 938-9130

Auto blog

Nissan GT-R takes a bloody whack at supercar rivals in fake ads

Mon, 23 Jun 2014

A big part of what makes a supercar super is how it makes you feel, but the performance stats and bragging rights are undeniably a big part of the equation as well. Which means you can't ignore the fact that, even with its price ever escalating, the Nissan GT-R makes minced meat out of European exotics costing twice or three times as much.
That's the inspiration for this trio of fake ads from photographer Tim Kent. In this mock campaign, Kent has depicted the GT-R as a butcher's knife and the European exotics as pieces of slaughtered meat. Ferrari is symbolized by a package of horse meat, Porsche by a pack of sausages and Lamborghini as a pair of, um... "prairie oysters".
Of course the ads are never going to run anywhere, and if you're squeamish (or vegetarian) we wouldn't suggest looking at them in close proximity to your lunch. But we have to admit they're creative, and effective.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.

2014 Nissan Rogue earns IIHS Top Safety Pick+ [w/videos]

Thu, 20 Mar 2014

The 2014 Nissan Rogue has scored a Top Safety Pick+ award following positive crash test results by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The new crossover scored good results (the highest rating) in the group's five crashworthiness checks and a basic rating for front crash prevention.
The IIHS found that the Rogue also performed well in its small overlap front test with a low risk of injuries, and the driver's space maintained its structure well. It was an improvement over the previous generation, which received a marginal rating in that evaluation. The Rogue's optional forward collision warning system was enough for a basic rating in avoiding accidents.
To qualify as a Top Safety Pick, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations, plus a good or acceptable result in the small overlap front test. To receive the additional Plus rating in 2014, it must also have a basic, advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention. The IIHS scores vehicles as good, acceptable, marginal or poor, and avoidance systems are scored basic, advanced or superior, depending on the type of system and its performance. Scroll down to watch the videos of the small and moderate overlap crash tests and read the full IIHS statement.