Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1994 Xe Nissan Pickup, Red, Automatic Transmission! on 2040-cars

US $1,800.00
Year:1994 Mileage:88000 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Decatur, Alabama, United States

Decatur, Alabama, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:4 X 2
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1N6SD11S4RC305576 Year: 1994
Exterior Color: Red
Make: Nissan
Interior Color: Gray
Model: Other Pickups
Number of Cylinders: 4 CYLINDERS
Trim: XE
Drive Type: AUTOMATIC TRANS, 2 WHEEL DRIVE
Mileage: 88,000
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1994 XE NISSAN PICKUP TRUCK!

PURCHASED NEW BY PRESENT OWNER/SELLER, 88,000 MILES ON IT, BED LINER PUT IN IT THE DAY AFTER PURCHASE.


TRUCK NEEDS WORK~!

ENGINE HAS CRANK-SHAFT BARRING MALFUNCTION ON ONE CYLINDER, NO FURTHER DAMAGE TO THE ENGINE IS KNOWN TO US.

PRIOR TO THE BAD BARRING, WE HAD A NEW TIMING CHAIN AND FUEL INJECTORS INSTALLED ON THE TRUCK, ONLY DROVE IT 100 MILES AFTER THAT UNTIL THE BARRING DROPPED.

THIS TRUCK HAS BODY DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT FRONT FENDER AS SHOWN IN THE PICTURE AND THE REAR BUMPER HAS SOME DAMAGE.

THIS IS AN IDEAL TRUCK TO REBUILD, BUT SCRAP VALUE EXCEEDS OUR ASKING PRICE, THIS MODEL HAS THE OLD HIGH PRICE CONVERTER ON IT. JUST ONE THING THAT ADDS MORE VALUE TO THE TRUCK AS-IS.

WE OFFER LOCAL PICKUP ONLY ON THIS TRUCK OR BUYER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ARRANGING SHIPPING.

WE EXPECT FULL PAYMENT ON TRUCK WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CLOSE OF AUCTION AND PICK-UP WITHIN 7 DAYS. MUST BE PAID IN FULL BEFORE SCHEDULING PICKUP.

THANK YOU FOR LOOKING AND HAVE FUN BIDDING
ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS WELCOME

Auto Services in Alabama

Worldpac ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 260 Oxmoor Pl, Cahaba-Heights
Phone: (205) 621-8828

Wayne`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2316 Highway 78, Sumiton
Phone: (205) 648-3003

Waites Tire and Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 310 Battle St E, Talladega
Phone: (256) 362-6632

Vinnies Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 26030 Capital Dr., Loxley
Phone: (251) 213-8257

Vestavia Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 2000 Buena Vista Dr, Vestavia
Phone: (205) 979-3661

Trammell Mike Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2121 2nd Ave S, Birmingham
Phone: (205) 323-5515

Auto blog

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

Consumer Reports no longer recommends Honda Civic

Mon, Oct 24 2016

Consumer Reports annual Car Reliability Survey is out, and yes, there are some big surprises. First and foremost? The venerable publication no longer recommends the Honda Civic. In fact, aside from the walking-dead CR-Z and limited-release Clarity fuel-cell car, the Civic is the only Honda to miss out on CR's prestigious nod. At the opposite end there's a surprise as well – Toyota and Lexus remain the most reliable brands on the market, but Buick cracked the top three. That's up from seventh last year, and the first time for an American brand to stand on the Consumer Reports podium. Mazda's entire lineup earned Recommended checks as well. Consumer Reports dinged the Civic for its "infuriating" touch-screen radio, lack of driver lumbar adjustability, the limited selection of cars on dealer lots fitted with Honda's popular Sensing system, and the company's decision to offer LaneWatch instead of a full-tilt blind-spot monitoring system. Its score? A lowly 58. The Civic isn't the only surprise drop from CR's Recommended ranks. The Audi A3, Ford F-150, Subaru WRX/STI, and Volkswagen Jetta, GTI, and Passat all lost the Consumer Reports' checkmark. On the flipside, a number of popular vehicles graduated to the Recommended ranks, including the BMW X5, Chevrolet Camaro, Corvette, and Cruze, Hyundai Santa Fe, Porsche Macan, and Tesla Model S. Perhaps the biggest surprise is the hilariously recall-prone Ford Escape getting a Recommended check – considering the popularity of Ford's small crossover, this is likely a coup for the brand, as it puts the Escape on a level playing field with the Recommended Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, and Nissan Rogue. While Ford is probably happy to see CR promote the Escape, the list wasn't as kind for every brand. For example, of the entire Fiat Chrysler Automobiles catalog, the ancient Chrysler 300 was the only car to score a check – there wasn't a single Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati, or Ram on the list. That hurts. FCA isn't alone at the low end, either. GMC, Jaguar Land Rover, Mini, and Mitsubishi don't have a vehicle on CR's list between them, while brands like Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Nissan, Lincoln, Infiniti, and Cadillac only have a few models each. You can check out Consumer Reports entire reliability roundup, even without a subscription, here.

Asian automakers still reluctant to use more aluminum

Tue, Jun 24 2014

There's a logical progression of technology in the auto industry. We've seen it with things like carbon-ceramic brakes, which use to be the sole domain of six-figure sports cars, where they often cost as much as an entry level Toyota Corolla. Now, you can get them on a BMW M3 (they're still pricey, at $8,150). Who knows, maybe in the next four a five years, they'll be available on something like a muscle car or hot hatchback. Aluminum has had a similar progression, although it's further along, moving from the realm of Audi and Jaguar luxury sedans to Ford's most important product, the F-150. With the stuff set to arrive in such a big way on the market, we should logically expect an all-aluminum Toyota Camry or Honda Accord soon, right? Um, wrong. Reuters has a great report on what's keeping Asian manufacturers away from aluminum, and it demonstrates yet another stark philosophical difference between automakers in the east and those in the west. Of course, there's a pricing argument at play. But it's more than just the cost of aluminum sheet (shown above) versus steel. Manufacturing an aluminum car requires extensive retooling of existing factories, not to mention new relationships with suppliers and other logistical and financial nightmares. Factor that in with what Reuters calls Asian automaker's preference towards "evolutionary upgrades," and the case for an all-aluminum Accord is a difficult one. Instead, manufacturers in the east are focusing on developing even stronger steel as a means of trimming fat, although analysts question how long that practice can continue. Jeff Wang, the automotive sales director for aluminum supplier Novelis, predicts that we'll see a bump in aluminum usage from Japanese and Korean brands in the next two to three years, and that it will be driven by an influx of aluminum-based vehicles from western automakers into China. Only time will tell if he's proven right. News Source: ReutersImage Credit: Sean Gallup / Getty Images Plants/Manufacturing Honda Hyundai Mazda Nissan Toyota Technology aluminum