Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 White Nissan Maxima Gle Sedan 4-door 3.0l on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:199643 Color: White /
 Black
Location:

Royersford, Pennsylvania, United States

Royersford, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 2988CC 182Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: JN1CA21A4XT706123 Year: 1999
Make: Nissan
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: Maxima
Trim: GLE Sedan 4-Door
Options: Heated Seats, Driver/ Passenger Temperature Control, Sunroof, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: FWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 199,643
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
Number of Doors: 4
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

The 1999 Nissan Maxima is in excellent condition with 199500 miles on it.  New tires were placed on the car 3 months ago.  The leather seats are in great condition.  The sunroof and power windows allow you to enjoy the fresh air while driving.  The car has been a smoke free environment since I have had it for the past 3 years.  I am willing to consider any offers above 1700 dollars.  The car is valued at 4500.  The inspection on the car is up to date.  The Maxima drives like a new car and has been kept in top condition.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Yorkshire Garage & Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 91 Longstown Rd, Hellam
Phone: (717) 755-6121

Willis Honda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1201 Route 130 N, Tullytown
Phone: (609) 386-2600

Used Car World West Liberty ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 2531 W Liberty Ave, Presto
Phone: (412) 343-3334

Usa Gas ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Convenience Stores
Address: 5901 Mill Creek Rd, Wycombe
Phone: (215) 269-1198

Trone Service Station ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Emissions Inspection Stations, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 2400 W Market St, Loganville
Phone: (717) 792-9916

Tri State Preowned ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 203 N 7th St, Chalk-Hill
Phone: (724) 603-3727

Auto blog

Why it's difficult to accurately test the efficiency of a plug-in car

Thu, Feb 5 2015

When it comes to electric vehicles and plug-ins in general, the Environmental Protection Agency-certified range is a hugely important number. While actual range anxiety is largely psychological, the magic number does provide a point of comparison of buyers considering one EV over another. The driving distance is also often touted by automakers when marketing their models. Unfortunately, as Green Car Reports finds in a recent deep dive, the way the EPA calculates the figure is a convoluted mess, and discovering the reasons why is definitely worth the read. The issue isn't about bad science but instead comes down to vague wording. The EPA's accepted range test is sourced from an evaluation called J-1634 from the Society of Automotive Engineers, and it seems to provide balanced results for vehicles that automatically reach a single state of charge when plugged in. However for models with multiple charge settings, the situation gets complicated very quickly. Of course, these modes are often created in the software, meaning that a car's certified driving distance can change with just a few taps of the keyboard without the real world results owners might experience actually changing. By showing the test's effects on the certified range for the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf and Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive over the last few years, Green Car Reports makes a compelling argument that it's the evaluation that needs to change. Thankfully, it appears that the solution is a very simple one. Get the details here.

2020 Ford Escape hybrids vs other crossover fuel sippers: How they compare on paper

Wed, Apr 3 2019

Along with a new generation of Escape, Ford also reintroduced the world to the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid. And if that weren't enough, Ford is adding a plug-in hybrid version. This is a sign of the times: people are more crossover crazy than ever, but are also seeking ways to use less fuel, whether it's for environmental or purely money-motivated reasons. The Ford hybrids aren't the only fuel-efficient compact crossovers on the market. They will be going head-to-head with conventional hybrids including the 2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. There are other plug-in hybrids including the 2019 Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the plug-in version of the 2019 Kia Niro. There are even a couple diesels in the form of the 2019 Chevy Equinox and 2019 GMC Terrain. So we've rounded up the details on all these crossovers to see who leads and lags in criteria such as power, fuel efficiency, space and price. Check out all their details below. 2019 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid View 68 Photos How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Conventional Hybrids and Diesels Let's face it, if you're buying one of these crossovers, one of the things that matters most to you is just how frugal with fuel they are. We'll start off with the conventional hybrids and diesels, and the clear victor is the Kia Niro, which in base FE trim, manages to hit 50 mpg combined. This is thanks to it sharing its powertrain with the Hyundai Ioniq, the Hyundai equivalent of the Toyota Prius. Buyers should take note that only the FE returns such high fuel economy. The LX and EX drop to 49 mpg, and the S Touring and Touring get 43. Even then, the least efficient Niro is the most efficient of the normal hybrids and diesels. It is nearly the least powerful, though, with 139 horsepower. Just behind it is the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. It delivers 40 mpg combined, and it has an ace up its sleeve: it comes standard with all-wheel drive. Every other vehicle in this powertrain group has front drive standard, and the Niro isn't available with all-wheel drive at all. If that weren't enough, the RAV4 Hybrid also boasts the most power at 219 horses. While we can't say anything about Escape Hybrid fuel economy, we do know that it will make 198 horsepower, which is close to the class-leading RAV4. The least powerful of these is the Equinox and Terrain, and they return the worst fuel economy at 32 mpg.

Roller coaster or racecar, which pulls more Gs?

Tue, 15 Jul 2014

Looking for a thrill? You're not the only one. You'll find kindred spirits at airfields going up for a skydive, atop bridges and towers with bungees attached to their feet and standing in line for roller coasters at the local amusement park. But you'll also find them in the paddock at the racing circuit.
So what's the commonality? G-force. It's like gravity, only in each of these cases, it's experienced by human invention. But which activity subjects your body to the greatest amount of g-force? That's what Nissan set to find out.
Before putting them back in the cockpit, Nismo sent out two of its young hot-shoes - Jann Mardenborough and Mark Shulzhitskiy - to an amusement park in the UK with a camera and a g-force meter to find out if any of the coasters could produce as much lateral gravitational force as an LMP2 racing car. See what they found in the pair of videos, below.