Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Nissan Leaf S on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:2013 Mileage:88780 Color: Ocean Blue /
 Black
Location:

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States
Transmission:AT
Fuel Type:Electric
For Sale By:Private Seller
Engine:Electric UU
Body Type:Hatchback
Vehicle Title:Clean
Seller Notes: “Level 1 &2 charging, 60 mile range, level 1 charger included, spare tire & jack.Bluetooth, Sirius radio, USB connector, heated wheel & seats, new tires (less than 1k on tires), 1 key fobNeeds: clear coat (rear hatch sun damage), TPS replacement (tire pressure monitoring sensor)” Read Less
Year: 2013
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1N4AZ0CPXDC420524
Mileage: 88780
Interior Color: Black
Number of Seats: 5
Number of Previous Owners: 2
Drive Side: Left-Hand Drive
Exterior Color: Ocean Blue
Car Type: electric
Number of Doors: 4
Features: --
Power Options: --
Warranty: Unspecified
Trim: S
Make: Nissan
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Back Seat Safety Belts, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Traction Control
Date of 1st Registration: 20240601
Fuel: electric
Model: Leaf
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions

Auto Services in Florida

Xtreme Auto Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Boat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 549 N Goldenrod Rd, Clermont
Phone: (407) 674-9523

Volvo Of Tampa ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 6008 N Dale Mabry Hwy, Valrico
Phone: (813) 885-2717

Value Tire Loxahatchee ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 105TH Ave. North Unit #28, West-Palm-Beach
Phone: (561) 290-0127

Upholstery Solutions ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3099 Ste 2 Leon Rd, Jacksonville
Phone: (904) 318-6199

Transmission Physician ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 30940 Suneagle Dr # 102, Astatula
Phone: (352) 383-0026

Town & Country Golf Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Golf Cars & Carts
Address: 1114 Bichara Blvd, Weirsdale
Phone: (352) 753-9392

Auto blog

NHTSA investigating 200,000 Sentra, Versa models over brakes

Tue, 27 May 2014

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a second investigation into Nissan in May. The first covered inaccurate fuel gauges in the 2007 Quest minivan. The latest affects the Sentra and Versa from the 2013 and 2014 model years and the 2014 Versa Note, because of complaints of long brake pedal travel. If NHTSA finds a problem, it could affect an estimated 200,000 vehicles.
At the moment, this is still only a preliminary evaluation "to asses the scope, frequency and safety-related consequences of the alleged defect," according to the report, but it could lead to the full recall. NHTSA is still trying to find whether or not there are accidents, injuries or fatalities related to the problem. At this time, much of the data in the document is still marked Confidential or TBD. Nissan told Reuters in a statement that the company is working with the agency on the investigation and supplying the regulator with further information.
According to NHTSA, its Office of Defects Investigation has received eight complaints about long pedal travel in these models. They allege that the brake pedal goes all the way to the floor when pressed in some cases and doesn't sufficiently slow the vehicle. Autoblog has contacted Nissan for its reaction to the investigation. We will update this story when we receive a reply. Until then, scroll down to read the current investigation report.

Datsun's lackluster initial sales fall below Tata Nano

Wed, 15 Oct 2014

When Tata introduced the Nano back in 2008, everyone was amazed at how cheap it was. They called it a game changer, but no game was changed. In fact, it took Tata five years to sell the 250,000 units it had the capacity to build in a single year. As it turns out, even buyers in what economists call "developing markets" like India aren't necessarily interested in buying an ultra-cheap automobile. And now it appears that Nissan may be falling into the same trap.
A little over a year ago, Nissan revived its old moniker Datsun to serve as a budget brand - similar to what ally Renault did with Dacia. Its lineup (consisting of models like the Go hatchback, Go+ minivan, On-Do sedan and Mi-Do hatch) is largely based on old architecture, packaged with little more than basic equipment and sold at rock-bottom prices. But Bloomberg reports that, even in the brand's core markets like India and Indonesia, the new Datsuns haven't been selling.
According to local industry figures, Datsun has sold fewer than 10,000 units of its $5,100 Go hatchbacks in India since its introduction back in March. Maruti Suzuki, by comparison, sells twice that many of its similarly priced Alto hatchbacks every month. In fact, after peaking in April, Datsun only sold 607 units in India this past July, dipping 77 percent to drop below even the number of Nanos which Tata sold that month.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.