Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2015 Nissan Gt-r Black Edition on 2040-cars

US $54,300.00
Year:2015 Mileage:12689 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Denver, Colorado, United States

Denver, Colorado, United States
Advertising:

If you have any questions feel free to email: seansccappelli@rpgfans.com .

2015 GTR Black Edition - Very freshly built Switzer Ultimate Street Edition (USE)
Switzer Ultimate Street Edition for R35 GTR (enhanced over standard USE Build)
Power: 1000+ WHP on 93 octane pump fuel / 1100WHP / 900TQ on 100 octane
6-Maps (includes Cobb Accessport V3 w/ TCM), approximate as follows:
(1) 700+ WHP, (2) 850+ WHP, (3) 1000+WHP w/Traction/Boost Control (TC), (4) 1000+ HP No TC, (5) 1100 WHP w/TC, (6)
1100 WHP NO TC.
THE ULTIMATE SLEEPER!
This GTR was sent to Switzer with 11,371 miles on the odometer in mid April 2016. I received the car back in late
July 2016. Since I've had it back, I've put 1,318 miles on it. I have only participated in one event with it, The
Colorado Mile, only taking 7 total runs, on the first cool morning of the event, with all runs before lunch
(actually had the last run before lunch on Friday). The first 5 runs were very easy, shifting at 2K in 1st/2nd
until I hit 3rd to make a good pull to 7K for a good datalog to send back to Swizter for ECU tuning in the 1st,
2nd, and 3rd maps . I then took 2 decent runs (tickets from 2 of those runs shown in photos). I did not launch the
car at the event (haven't since I received it back from Switzer). Am I scared to? Probably. But, this event was
primarily to send datalogs from pulls back to Switzer for final ECU tuning in Colorado. So, I took it easy. I ran
in the under 200mph class (no roll bar, 5 point harness, fire system, etc.) in the full weight car. I had to back
off in both runs as not to brake out of the class limit, still did with a 203. You can check the Colorado Mile web
site for the results. You can see by the second ticket in the photo that I was quicker in the 1/4 and 1/2, but
ended slower top speed than the 203 run. I actually hit 210 at about 7/8 mile and fully let off on that run.
Didn't want to get kicked from the event. Car ran very fast being that I really didn't push it, or launch it, and
the Front Range Airport is at 5,500 feet! This car has the 13th fastest car speed at the Colorado Mile in the last
2-years (event started in 2015), but it is actually quicker as mentioned. It would easily be in the top 3-5 if it
had the safety equipment, used the R888's, actually launched the vehicle, and ran the 100 Maps as well! Beast!
But, best part about the car, drove it to the track and drove it home. This is a daily driver if desired. This
thing would be phenomenal to drive at Sea Level (Texas Mile!).
Too note, I haven't even tested the 100 Octane maps yet!
This car has been inspected recently and serviced by Boulder Nissan. Boulder Nissan has serviced the vehicle since
I've had it the past year+, and even after the build (general items, oil changes (I supply the Switzer spec'd oil
and filter to them)). The Brembo Carbon/Ceramic kit was purchased from Switizer, but installed by Auto Trends in
Fort Collins, CO. Went to HPR once to bed in the Carbon Ceramic brakes.
To build a car like this you would need to spend $70-85K on newer used GTR, over $80k on the complete build, and
have a minimum 3-4 month wait time for the build. So, instead of waiting for you GTR to be built, I suggest you
pick up my extremely clean, "lighlty" tested, and beyond fast 2015 GTR BE. It is sitting in my garage under its
heavy duty car cover currently, just waiting for you!
Besides the info below, I am currently running Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2's (stock sizing) with less than 500 miles
on them. Additionally, I have brand new Toyo R888's (Front 285/35R20 100Y, Rear 315/30R20 101Y), that I planned
to use at next summers 1/2 Mile Airstrip Attack in Colorado Springs, and an additional set of Continentals (Stock
Sizing

Auto Services in Colorado

Windshields Express ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Glass-Beveled, Carved, Etched, Ornamental, Etc
Address: 685 W Gunnison Ave, Grand-Jct
Phone: (970) 243-2201

Windows & Glass Plus ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Automobile Accessories
Address: 10141 Montview Blvd, Montbello
Phone: (303) 341-2222

United Junk Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 695 Kipling St, Evergreen
Phone: (720) 255-0350

Toy-Auto Masters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4450 S Broadway, Englewood
Phone: (303) 730-7052

Stonum Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1116 Colorado Ave Unit A, Longmont
Phone: (720) 340-5029

Spradley Barr Ford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4809 S College Ave, Fort-Collins
Phone: (970) 206-8550

Auto blog

GM, Ford, Honda winners in 'Car Wars' study as industry growth continues

Wed, May 11 2016

General Motors' plans to aggressively refresh its product lineup will pay off in the next four years with strong market share and sales, according to an influential report released Tuesday. Ford, Honda, and FCA are all poised to show similar gains as the auto industry is expected to remain healthy through the rest of the decade. The Bank of America Merrill Lynch study, called Car Wars, analyzes automakers' future product plans for the next four model years. By 2020, 88 percent of GM's sales will come from newly launched products, which puts it slightly ahead of Ford's 86-percent estimate. Honda (85 percent) and FCA (84 percent) follow. The industry average is 81 percent. Toyota checks in just below the industry average at 79 percent, with Nissan trailing at 76 percent. Car Wars' premise is: automakers that continually launch new products are in a better position to grow sales and market share, while companies that roll out lightly updated models are vulnerable to shifting consumer tastes. Though Detroit and Honda grade out well in the study, many major automakers are clumped together, which means large market-share swings are less likely in the coming years. Bank of America Merrill Lynch predicts the industry will top out with 20 million sales in 2018 and then taper off, perhaps as much as 30 percent by 2026. Not surprisingly, trucks, sport utility vehicles and crossovers will be the key battlefield in the next few years, Car Wars says. FCA will launch a critical salvo in 2018 with a new Ram 1500, followed by new generations of the Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra in 2019, and then Ford's F-150 for 2020, according to the study. Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyst John Murphy said the GM trucks could be pulled ahead even earlier to 2018, prompting Ford to respond. "This focus on crossovers and trucks is a great thing for the industry," Murphy said. Cars Wars looks at Korean (76 percent replacement rate) and European companies more vaguely (70 percent), but argues their slower product cadence and lineups with fewer trucks puts them in weaker positions than their competitors through 2020. Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Featured Gallery 2016 Chevrolet Silverado View 11 Photos Image Credit: Chevrolet Earnings/Financials Chrysler Fiat Ford GM Honda Nissan Toyota study FCA

Runway Rumble: Nissan GT-R, Ducati 1098 and Lamborghini Reventon Roadster battle it out

Tue, 29 Jan 2013

One 2.5-mile runway, three different ways to take off: a Ducati 1098, a tuned Nissan GT-R with 580 horsepower and a launch control upgrade, and a Lamborghini Reventon Roadster. You'd naturally expect the Ducati to assert it's lightweight, high-horsepower authority in these matters, but with more than two miles to run, the ride that gets the jump at the line isn't always the one that gets the win.
That comes in especially handy for the Lamborghini, which suffers from a bad start in the first race and just looks plain ordinary in the second, until it finds redemption. You can see how it all goes down in the video below.

NHTSA probes Nissan Versa for potential pedal problem

Tue, Apr 7 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is commissioning an engineering analysis to investigate a possible problem with the 2013-2015 Nissan Versa and 2014-2015 Versa Note. The agency wants to gather more information about sections of the footwell that can potentially interfere with operating the pedals, and NHTSA estimates this could affect 360,000 vehicles if the agency requests a recall. The preliminary evaluation of this problem was opened last June when NHTSA received a report of a driver's foot being trapped by a trim panel on the right side of the footwell. Since then, the government agency has tallied 24 total complaints, including one crash and an injury, which might have been linked to this issue. It's also possible the HVAC relay actuator in a nearby area could be doing the same thing. Either might lead to unintended acceleration and delayed braking. NHTSA's new engineering analysis is meant to "assess the scope, frequency and safety-related consequences of the alleged defect." It also adds the 2015 Versa Sedan and Note to the list of potentially affected models but removes the examples from 2012 because of a different footwell panel design. "Nissan is cooperating fully to answer the agency's questions," the automaker said in a prepared statement emailed to Autoblog (embedded in full below). You can read the entire report in PDF format, including photos of the potential issue, here. INVESTIGATION Subject : Pedal Operation Interference Date Investigation Opened: APR 01, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: EA15003 Component(s): SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC , VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Mode lModel Year(s) NISSAN VERSA 2013-2015 NISSAN VERSA NOTE 2014-2015 Details Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc. SUMMARY: On June 24, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE14-018 to investigate allegations that the tunnel carpet cover trim panel on model year (MY) 2012 through 2014 Nissan Versa, Versa Sedan and Versa Note vehicles has, in certain situations, interfered with the driver's ability to promptly release the accelerator pedal and transition to the brake pedal. This may result in delayed brake application or brief incidents of unwanted acceleration.