2014 Nissan Armada Platinum on 2040-cars
6520 Autopark Drive, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
Engine:5.6L V8 32V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5N1AA0NE2EN607190
Stock Num: 314085
Make: Nissan
Model: Armada Platinum
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Galaxy Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 6
4WD, Backup Camera, Bose Stereo, Captains Chairs, Demo Special!, Leather, Navigation, Navigation System, Rear DVD, and Sunroof / Moonroof. Looking for a great deal on a fantastic 2014 Nissan Armada? Well, we`ve got it and it`s specially-priced and ready to roll. This Armada has strong styling that really grabs your attention! Price includes: $1,500 - Nissan Customer Cash - National. Exp. 06/30 Smith Nissan is Western Arkansas, Eastern Oklahoma and NW Arkansas' premier, family owned and operated dealership.New Nissan cars, trucks, SUV's and Cargo Vans, and a climate controlled service center with the most spoiled mechanics in town. You'll love our no pressure, no hassle approach and with every vehicle, you get the service that you've come to expect at Smith Nissan.
Nissan Armada for Sale
2014 nissan armada platinum(US $51,586.00)
2013 nissan armada platinum(US $42,997.00)
2005 nissan armada le(US $13,990.00)
2014 nissan armada platinum(US $51,715.00)
2014 nissan armada platinum(US $51,715.00)
2014 nissan armada platinum(US $54,195.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Wingfoot Commercial Tire ★★★★★
Superior Tire & Express Lube ★★★★★
Steve Jones Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★
Roberts Auto Repair ★★★★★
Rhodes Auto Brokers ★★★★★
North Arkansas Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
Why it's difficult to accurately test the efficiency of a plug-in car
Thu, Feb 5 2015When it comes to electric vehicles and plug-ins in general, the Environmental Protection Agency-certified range is a hugely important number. While actual range anxiety is largely psychological, the magic number does provide a point of comparison of buyers considering one EV over another. The driving distance is also often touted by automakers when marketing their models. Unfortunately, as Green Car Reports finds in a recent deep dive, the way the EPA calculates the figure is a convoluted mess, and discovering the reasons why is definitely worth the read. The issue isn't about bad science but instead comes down to vague wording. The EPA's accepted range test is sourced from an evaluation called J-1634 from the Society of Automotive Engineers, and it seems to provide balanced results for vehicles that automatically reach a single state of charge when plugged in. However for models with multiple charge settings, the situation gets complicated very quickly. Of course, these modes are often created in the software, meaning that a car's certified driving distance can change with just a few taps of the keyboard without the real world results owners might experience actually changing. By showing the test's effects on the certified range for the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf and Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive over the last few years, Green Car Reports makes a compelling argument that it's the evaluation that needs to change. Thankfully, it appears that the solution is a very simple one. Get the details here.
Nissan Altima and Sentra to get Murano-inspired design redo
Tue, 07 Oct 2014The Nissan Altima and Sentra sedans are both very competent, economical, comfortable and well-equipped ways of getting from A to B. They're also both decidedly boring to look at, which is not a good trait in their increasingly style-driven segments.
To rectify this, Nissan is planning design overhauls for its mainstream, with the Sentra adopting the sportier, Euro-style looks of the Pulsar, according to The Car Connection. While that (sadly) won't mean the five-door Pulsar will come to the US market, fitting the European stylings to the Sentra should go a long way towards broadening the car's appeal.
That parcel of information comes from Nissan design boss Shiro Nakamura, who spoke to The Car Connection at last week's Paris Motor Show.
Nissan and Renault chief engineers meeting to revive joint projects
Mon, Jan 27 2020PARIS — Renault's engineering boss will meet his counterpart at Nissan in Japan this week, two sources close to Renault said, as the carmakers seek to revive projects crucial to an alliance left reeling by the Carlos Ghosn affair. The Franco-Japanese alliance is wrestling with the fallout of the ouster and arrest of Ghosn, the architect of the partnership who now says it is at risk of collapse. Analysts say that in order to turn investor sentiment around, the firms need to make good on cost-saving joint engineering projects that have slowed since Ghosn's departure. According to the two sources, Gilles Le Borgne, who was hired on Jan. 6 from rival automaker PSA, will meet Nissan's Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, the Nissan executive in charge of delivering the joint engineering projects. Renault did not respond to a request for comment on Le Borgne's meetings. Renault-Nissan's cost-saving alliance is vital to both companies as the car industry battles a slowdown and huge investments in cleaner vehicles and automated driving. "The alliance has taken a hit, but the alliance engineering team is still there," said a third source, who is close to the alliance. "You cannot, from one day to the next, stop something that's been embedded so deeply." Japanese prosecutors arrested Ghosn — who was at the time the head of the carmakers' alliance -- in November 2018 and accused him of financial misconduct. Ghosn slipped out of Japan and fled at the end of December to Lebanon. He says the charges were fabricated to force him out of an alliance in which the Japanese side no longer trusted its French partners. Renault Chairman Jean-Dominique Senard has said both sides are determined to make the partnership succeed, with the joint projects a major focus. Those projects will be on the agenda when the board of the alliance, which also includes Japanese carmaker Mitsubishi <7211.T>, holds a regular meeting in Japan on Jan. 30. One area of focus will be hybrid power systems, a field where, analysts say, the alliance has not effectively pooled its research and development efforts. Each of the three members of the alliance has developed their own systems. "That's been among the sources of the friction," said the third source close to the alliance.
