Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Nissan Pathfinder Armada Le Low Miles Tv's Dvd Captains Chairs 4x4 Woofer on 2040-cars

US $22,500.00
Year:2004 Mileage:33500
Location:

Orem, Utah, United States

Orem, Utah, United States
Advertising:

2004 Nissan Pathfinder Armada LE - extremely low miles 33.5k

- LE Model with Leather, heated seats, DVD, 4 screens, upgraded stereo w/amp
- 33,500 miles
- 4x4
- middle row captains chairs (center console removable for walkway)
- iphone/ipod hookup
- rear camera
- good tires
- 30k service ($1,000) just performed at Nissan Dealership
- Amazing shape for a 10 year old SUV, runs and drives great
- rear decal is removable (sticker)

feel free to call or text me anytime at 385.204.8433

Auto Services in Utah

Westech Equipment ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Industrial Equipment & Supplies, Generators
Address: 195 W 3900 S, Salt-Lake-City
Phone: (855) 769-1763

West Valley Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 1975 S 1045 W, Bingham-Canyon
Phone: (801) 974-5030

Wasatch Body Shop, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Rustproofing & Undercoating-Automotive
Address: 373 American Ave, Bountiful
Phone: (801) 618-4594

Unique Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 11521 S Redwood Rd, South-Jordan
Phone: (801) 302-0966

Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 777 W Riverdale Rd, Sunset
Phone: (855) 634-0095

Tint Specialists Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Detailing
Address: 4800 South 150 West #40, West-Valley-City
Phone: (801) 261-3232

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Tesla, BMW and Nissan meeting in secret to discuss charging tech

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's interesting what's happening in the electric vehicle field. It used to be that BMW and Tesla were competitors. Then – and of course they're still competing, especially in the public mind – they were working together on ... something. Maybe. And now, the Financial Times reports that the two luxury automakers are meeting with Nissan. Again, maybe. The scuttlebutt is that the three companies are interested in working together on something to do with charging electric vehicles, potentially a global recharging standard. Currently, when it comes to fast charging, BMW uses the SAE Combo standard, Nissan uses CHAdeMO and Tesla uses its own Superchargers. The meeting was prompted by Tesla opening of all of its patents the other day, FT says. Speaking during the recent annual shareholder meeting, Musk said he was "more than happy to have other manufacturers" use Tesla's Superchargers but that, "there is no other electric car that can accept anything close to 135 kilowatts." Let's assume the technical hurdle can be overcome. With any potential patent/licensing problems out of the way, these discussions with BMW and Nissan might be revolving around this other angle that Musk mentioned: "They (other automakers) just have to contribute to the capital cost, so figure out what percentage of the time are their cars using the Supercharger network and then they can make a contribution proportionate to their customer usage of the Supercharger network." That certainly sounds like something that could take some time to figure out. News Source: Financial TimesImage Credit: Elbilforeningen / Flickr Green BMW Nissan Tesla Electric supercharger chademo sae combo

2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo priced from $149,990* [w/videos]

Wed, 05 Mar 2014

Remember when they called the Nissan GT-R a supercar-slayer? You can drop the "slayer" part, because the Japanese brute known as Godzilla has long since grown from an ankle-biter nipping at the heels of giants to a giant in its own right. And if that's the case with the "basic" GT-R, it's certainly the case with the new GT-R Nismo.
While the base price for the GT-R has breached the six-figure mark, the Nismo version has just been priced ten bucks shy of $150k. Factor in the $1,595 destination charge and you're looking at a $151,585 sticker price. That may seem like a lot for a Nissan, but bear in mind what you're getting for all that scrap: the GT-R Nismo's 3.8-liter twin-turbo V6 has been optimized to deliver 600 horsepower and 481 pound-feet of torque to all four wheels.
We've yet to see official performance stats, but considering that the base GT-R hits 60 in 2.6 seconds with 55 hp and 18 lb-ft less muscle, the Nismo version ought to teach a lesson or two to exotic supercars costing twice or even ten times as much. Just check it out in the videos and press release below.