1956 Mercury Monterey 2 Door Hardtop on 2040-cars
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:312
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Black/white
Make: Mercury
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Monterey
Trim: 2 Door Hard top
Drive Type: 2wd
Mileage: 67,532
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: White/Black
It's a '56 Mercury Monterey, 2 door hardtop, originally 235hp Y-block 312 with 3 speed Merc-o-matic tranny. It's originally a Kansas car and remained their until about 2007 where it ended up in southern Colorado. I bought the car in Colorado and brought it here when I moved about a year ago.
I have both a current GA registration and I kept my clear CO title for the car when I moved here.
It runs great, starts easily, even when cold, and runs very, very strong. It's very responsive and pulls very hard all the way through. All in all, it's just a really fun driver to have a good time with. It's been reliable enough that I drive it all the time, including to work on nice days and around town. I put around 250 miles a month on it.
Original motor and trans. Good glass, other than some pits and some repaired chips in the windshield. The car was hot rodded a bit back in the 60's and I believe there's been some head work and a pretty healthy cam in it. The idle quality is good, but with a bit of a lope and a little higher than stock.
Rebuilt front suspension, new shocks, tires are about a year and a half old, new brake master cylinder, new wheel cylinders, new soft lines, mostly new hard lines, new Holley carb, '57 large pattern 4 bolt intake, 1957/58 distributor (no more Loadamatic distro), rebuilt speedometer, rebuilt transmission and torque converter (was over $2100), rebuilt gas tank, rebuilt radiator, rebuilt radio, new exhaust, Red's long tube headers, 4.10 gears with new bearings and seals, and a lot more. I was even able to find an original set of fender skirts for it.
There are a few things that don't work right, like a couple of the gauges (I have spares for them) and the clock. There's a small rust spot at the top of the rear wheel arches and I have patch panels from an original car for both. There's also a bit of rust in the front floor pans.
A $500 non-refundable deposit is required within 2 days of auction close either through Paypal or express mailed money order or certified check. The balance of the payment is due within 5 working days and may be cash if the car is picked up in person or with a money order, bank loan check, or certified check. Payment must clear before the car is released.
Buyer handles all shipping costs and arrangements and I would be happy to work with the shipper to schedule a time for pickup but the arrangements must be made by the buyer. If the car is to be shipped overseas, I am not responsible for dealing with customs.
On Feb-18-13 at 13:15:52 PST, seller added the following information:
The engine runs great and doesn't burn oil or coolant.
Mercury Monterey for Sale
1968 mercury monterey convertible custom show car(US $26,950.00)
1953 mercury ford monterey woodie wagon
1951 mercury monterey, 1949 mercury, 1950 mercury, lead sled, merc, hot rod
1963 mercury montrey
Convenience 4.2l heated & a/c seats power sliding doors one owner garage kept
1963 mercury monterey converible, classic, low rider, lowered
Auto Services in Georgia
ZBest Cars ★★★★★
Woody Butts Automotive ★★★★★
Williamson`s Used Cars Inc ★★★★★
Watson Transmissions ★★★★★
Ward`s Auto Paint & Bodyworks ★★★★★
Walker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Has the Mercury Marauder gotten better with age?
Fri, Oct 23 2015In the early 2000s Mercury desperately wanted to develop some edge for its brand – seemingly stuck between a quasi-premium, quasi-performance space in the Ford Universe. The Marauder is perhaps the most famous of the vehicles that resulted from those efforts, and is rapidly approaching Modern Classic status, today. Effectively a murdered out Grand Marquis with some updated trim pieces – what are company parts bins for, if not raiding? – the Marauder looked convincingly like a bad guy car. The 4.6-liter V8 under its hood that had been breathed on by engineers for a little more power, kicking out 302 horsepower and 318 pound-feet of torque from the factory. Not exactly Ferrari-baiting numbers, but it'd give your local cop's car a run for its money. Being a wild child of the last decade, of course our friends at MotorWeek had it on the program. What better way to test your mean-mugging muscle sedan than with John Davis' tanned and steady hands?
Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output
Mon, Jan 6 2014How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.
Junkyard Gem: 1971 Mercury Comet 2-Door Sedan
Sat, Sep 10 2022When Ford introduced the original Maverick for the 1970 model year, Dearborn tradition required that a Mercury-badged version be created. That car ended up being the Comet, built from the 1971 through 1977 model years. Here's one of those first-year Comets in rough but recognizable condition, found in a Denver self-service yard not long ago. The Comet name had spent the 1960s affixed to the flanks of Mercurized Ford Falcons (1960-1965) and Fairlanes (1966-1969). Since the Maverick was the successor of the Falcon — sales of which went into an irrecoverable downward spiral once its sportier Mustang first cousin hit the streets — it made sense to move the Comet name over to the Mercury version. Nearly every American Mercury model ever sold was a U.S.-market Ford model with a different name and some gingerbread slapped on. Notable exceptions to this tradition include the 1999-2002 Mercury Cougar (mechanically based on the Contour but with a unique body) and the 1991-1994 Mercury Capri (an Australian-built mashup of Mazda components borrowed from the Ford Laser). The Comet was by far the cheapest Mercury model available in 1971, though it was considered more prestigious than its Maverick counterpart. The price tag on the '71 Comet two-door sedan started at $2,217 (about $16,505 in 2022 dollars), while the '71 Maverick two-door sedan cost $2,175 ($16,193 today). Meanwhile, AMC would sell you a new Hornet two-door sedan for one dollar less than a Maverick, Chevrolet had the Nova coupe for a dollar more than the Maverick, and Plymouth offered the Valiant Duster for $2,313 ($17,220 now). Toyota had a Maverick competitor as well that year, with the Corona at $2,150 for the sedan and $2,310 for the coupe. Having driven every one of the aforementioned models, I'd take the Duster if I went back in time and had to choose one (as a 1969 Corona owner, I'm not a fan of the 1971 facelift, though the Corona's build quality beats the Duster's). The build sticker on this car tells us that it was built at the Kansas City Assembly Plant (where Transits and F-150s are made today) and sold through the Los Angeles district sales office (there was a DSO in Denver, so it's a near-certainty that this car didn't start out in Colorado). The paint started out as Bright Blue Metallic (it's neither bright nor metallic 51 years down the road) and the interior was done up in Medium Blue Cloth & Vinyl.