2006 Mercury Milan Premier Sedan 4-door 2.3l on 2040-cars
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Make: Mercury
Model: Milan Year: 2006 Engine: 4 cylinder Transmission: Manual Drive: Front wheel Miles: 105k Approx. MPG: 25-30 average Leather: Yes, black Power Driver Seat: Yes Power Passenger Seat: No Digital Climate Control: Yes Bluetooth Enabled Music & Phone: Yes Sunroof: Yes Spoiler: Yes Alloy rims: Yes High Performance Tires: Yes, 4 months old Winter tires included: Yes, 1 season old Auto-on Headlights: Yes Fog lights: Yes Power/Heated Mirrors: Yes Cruise Control: Yes Details: I love this car. I'm moving abroad, otherwise I'd probably keep it forever. I bought it new in 2006 and have taken great care of it since. It's had no problems except routine maintenance. I've changed the oil regularly, replaced brakes & rotors, wipers, and tires... nothing big. This car has been incredibly reliable. No accidents. Condition: It's great. It runs well. There's no rust. It does show signs of wear in that the paint on the spoiler has started to chip, the bumpers have small dents, and there's 2-3 car door dings. Also, the CD player is broken. It might be an easy fix but I put in bluetooth so I've just always used my phone. It auto-syncs up when you get in and you just hit play. The phone comes through the speakers too. The radio still works, just not the CD. Price: $9,000 |
Mercury Milan for Sale
- 2008 mercury milan base sedan 4-door 2.3l, $7800(US $7,700.00)
- 2006 black premier mechanic's special do not call email only!
- 2009 mercury milan voga/premier loaded 2.3l only 33k roof leather lowest deal!!!(US $8,500.00)
- Only 21k navigation leather sunroof loaded keyless greatcar rebuilt fusion focus(US $7,995.00)
- 2006 mercury milan premier sedan 4-door 2.3l beautiful(US $4,900.00)
- 2007 mercury milan premier sedan 4-door 3.0l
Auto Services in New Hampshire
Turbo Lube ★★★★★
Swat Automotive Service Inc ★★★★★
Northeast Performance Diesel ★★★★★
Monro Muffler Brake & Service ★★★★★
Lancaster Auto Sales ★★★★★
Kustra`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA probing 2000-2003 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable models over throttle issue
Mon, 29 Oct 2012A potential issue with the speed control cable collar has got the 2003-20003 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable under the spotlight of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. If the collar breaks it can cause the throttle to be stuck open.
The issue is limited to vehicles with the 3.0-liter V6 Duratec. There are just 50 complaints so far out of 310,000 cars, but the NHTSA has begun an investigation into whether a recall should be issued.
Does Lincoln Zephyr trademark mean a return to real names?
Wed, May 25 2016Lincoln's long history includes many legendary names, and despite its short life, Zephyr retains a spot in that pantheon. Perhaps its will return once again: Ford Motor Co. applied to trademark Zephyr on May 11. Trademark filings can have ambiguous meanings, and often they're legal plays to get or keep the rights to a name. But in the last year, we've seen signs Lincoln is looking to use real names on its vehicles again. Obviously, it's keeping Navigator for its flagship sport-utility vehicle with a new model due next year. Reprising Continental for the MKS replacement was also well received. That said, Lincoln still uses the MKX and MKC "names" for its crossovers. Zephyr is a dustier moniker. It was used in the 1930s and '40s on a mid-level model spearheaded by Edsel Ford. The stylishly aerodynamic model was set between the Ford V8 De Luxe and more expensive Lincolns. It returned in 2006 as the Lincoln version of the Ford Fusion before that model was renamed MKZ. Mercury also used Zephyr on its version of the Ford Fairmont in the late 1970s and early '80s. Ford last held a trademark on the Zephyr name in 2013. The filing says Ford seeks to use Zephyr for "motor vehicles and parts and accessories therefor." That could mean a new car — or just parts. Putting the Zephyr badge back on the MKZ is the most likely bet. Meanwhile, Ford also moved to get the Thunderbird trademark on May 11 for the same vehicles and parts purpose, and it filed for the Mustang trademark for shampoo and lotions on May 4. A Lincoln spokesman said, "In the normal course of our business, we file trademarks for names," but had no further information. Related Video:
Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output
Mon, Jan 6 2014How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.