No Reserve!!!second Owner! Never Smoked In!!!! on 2040-cars
Sterling, Illinois, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
Exterior Color: Gold
Make: Mercury
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Grand Marquis
Trim: LS Sedan 4-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 132,700
Number of Doors: 4
Hello up today for a NO RESERVE AUCTION!!! IS OUR '99 Mercury Marquis!
This vehicle has 132,700 miles(low mileage)!*4.6 liter v8 Engine!*
*There are NO chips, cracks, or fogging on the glass of the vehicle.*
*Very nice interior, CLEAN, No Rust, needs tires.*
*Never been smoked in!
*SECOND OWNER*
*RUNS GREAT!**This vehicle starts, runs, drives, steers, and stops EXCELLENT!
Mercury Grand Marquis for Sale
- 1970 mercury grand marquis convertible 429 v8 restoration project(US $2,675.00)
- Colony park ls
- 1991 mercury grand marquis colony park ls wagon 4-door 5.0l
- 2001 mercury grand marquis ls sedan 4-door(US $5,500.00)
- 2004 mercury grand marquis gs sedan 4-door 4.6l 43500 miles
- 2008 silver mercury grand marquis gs - 4.6 liter, 60k miles a+(US $12,900.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Yukikaze Auto Inc ★★★★★
Woodworth Automotive ★★★★★
Vogler Ford Collision Center ★★★★★
Ultimate Exhaust ★★★★★
Twin Automotive & Transmission ★★★★★
Trac Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA closes rollaway investigation into 1.56M Ford SUVs
Mon, 11 Mar 2013It's taken four years of study, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has finally closed the books on its investigation into rollaway accusations surrounding 1.56-million Ford SUV models.
The probe, which centered on the 2002-2005 Ford Explorer, 2002-2005 Mercury Mountaineer and 2003-2005 Lincoln Aviator, ends without the federal agency calling for a recall. According to The Detroit News, the investigation was closed due to a "low number of complaints" - NHTSA documented 180 such complaints that resulted in 14 crashes and six minor injuries, but the number of incidents have been slowing. The suspected defect rate for the trucks' automatic transmissions was found to be 4.4 per 100,000 units, and the brake-shift interlock mechanism failure rate was judged to be even lower at 3.4 per 100k.
Question of the Day: Most degraded car name?
Fri, May 27 2016When Ford came up with a not-so-sporty version of the Pinto and slapped Mustang badges on it in 1974, that was a low point for the Mustang name. When Chrysler applied the venerable Town & Country name on perfectly functional but unglamorous minivans, it saddened many of us. But perhaps the biggest demotion for a once-proud model came when, in 1988, General Motors imported a misery-enhancing Daewoo from Korea and called it the Pontiac LeMans. The original Pontiac LeMans was a great-looking midsize car with fairly advanced (for the time) suspension design and engine options including potent V8s and a screaming overhead-cam straight-six. The Daewoo-based Pontiac LeMans was a cramped, shoddy hooptie that served only to ruin the LeMans name forever, while stealing sales from the Suzuki-based Chevrolet Sprint. Sure, using the once-respected Monterey name on the Mercurized Ford Freestar was bad, but Mercury didn't have long to live at that point. I say the downward spiral of the LeMans name was the most agonizing in automotive history. What do you think? Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Auto News Ford Mercury Pontiac Automotive History Classics questions ford pinto names
Ford recalling 126,000 Fusions and Milans over wheel separation concern
Fri, 09 Dec 2011Ford has announced a recall of certain Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles after an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. A total of 128,616 2010 and 2011 models equipped with steel wheels may have been manufactured with wheel studs that could crack and split over time. If that happens, the vehicle may experience a wheel separation.
According to The Detroit News, the company is aware of a total of 30 wheel separation incidents, one of which occurred on the front of the vehicle. Even so, no injuries have been reported as a result of the defect.
The problem apparently stems from the fact that the mounting pads on the vehicles' steel wheels may have been faulty from the factory. In addition, the wheel mounting face on rear disc brakes may not have been installed properly. Ford will inspect the rear disc face and replace them as necessary. In addition, the company will replace all of the vehicle's wheel studs free of charge. Head to the NHTSA website for more information, and click past the jump to view the full recall notice.