Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1994 Mercury Grand Marquis on 2040-cars

Year:1994 Mileage:37800 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Torrance, California, United States

Torrance, California, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 2melm75w1rx667289 Year: 1994
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Mercury
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Grand Marquis
Trim: LS Sedan 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 37,800
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: White
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

We have a the cleanest mercury grand marques ls you will find anywhere!! It has only 37,800 original miles on it and has always been serviced at the ford dealer. The car has never been in any accidents and was always a non smoking car and the registration is paid till april of 2014. It just had a service done at power ford in torrance and needs absolutely nothing. The exterior is perfect with no dents or scratches anywhere and the interior is flawless with no tear and still looks like new. This car is a one owner car since new and driven by an elderly man until he passed away and was only driven around the block occasionally ever since and has been garaged every day since new. We have a clean title in hand and ready to give the new owner many years of reliable driving. 

    Auto Services in California

    Zenith Wire Wheel Co ★★★★★

    Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Tire Dealers
    Address: 818 Cristich Ln, Brookdale
    Phone: (831) 425-7770

    Yucca Auto Body ★★★★★

    Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
    Address: 56132 29 Palms Hwy, Pioneertown
    Phone: (760) 365-9410

    World Famous 4x4 ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
    Address: 75 E Palm Ave, Alhambra
    Phone: (818) 816-0121

    Woody`s & Auto Body ★★★★★

    Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
    Address: 22920 Lockness Ave, East-Rancho-Dominguez
    Phone: (310) 784-3820

    Williams Auto Care Center ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Auto Oil & Lube
    Address: 18380 Highway 12, Sonoma
    Phone: (707) 996-1056

    Wheels N Motion ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
    Address: 961 E Holt Ave, Chino
    Phone: (909) 622-1232

    Auto blog

    Automakers tussle over owners of 'orphan' makes

    Thu, 10 May 2012

    When General Motors put down several of its brands in recent years, it also let loose thousands of brand-loyal customers who will eventually need another car.
    R.L. Polk Associates estimates there are more than 18 million cars from 16 discontinued makes on the road today. Those "orphan owners" have sales-hungry competitors seeing dollar signs. GM is offering Saturn owners $1,000 cash toward a Chevy Cruze, Cadillac CTS or a GMC Acadia. Ford is giving its Mercury lease customers a chance to get out of their contracts with no early-termination penalty and offering to waive six remaining payments if they drive off in a Ford or Lincoln.
    Edmunds.com research shows the efforts are paying off somewhat for GM, with 39 percent of Pontiac owners, 37 percent of Hummer owners and 31 percent of Saturn owners taking delivery of another GM-branded vehicle. But that leaves as much as 69 percent of owners going elsewhere. Ford, Honda and Toyota seem to be attracting many former GM owners.

    NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

    Sat, Aug 15 2015

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.

    NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

    Mon, 17 Dec 2012

    According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
    The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
    On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"