Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone Hardtop With Bucket Seats - No Reserve! - Hot Rat Rod on 2040-cars

Year:1964 Mileage:79056 Color: Red /
 White
Location:

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Walla Walla, Washington, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Coupe
Engine:289
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 4J27K516836
Year: 1964
Interior Color: White
Make: Mercury
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Comet
Trim: Cyclone
Drive Type: Manual
Mileage: 79,056
Exterior Color: Red

No Reserve!

I am selling this sweet 64 Cyclone for a friend.  This was her father's car since 1982 and was last on the road in 1985, when it was parked until now.  It still has the original Washington '63 plates and the last tabs from 1985. Though it has been off the road since 1985, it has been ran and moved several times throughout the years to help keep everything fresh.  It has 79,056 original miles.  We hooked up en external fuel tank to ensure it was still a good runner and sure enough, it fired right up.  As any car of this age, you will need to go through it and tune it up prior to putting it back on the road. 

Some of the options include:

289 K code engine
4 Speed Manual Trans
3.25 gears in the rear
Original Chrome Engine Dress Up Kit
Cyclone Trim Package
Original interior
Original Paint
Dash Tach
Center Console
Original hubcaps (note: they are not fully pressed on the wheels in the pictures as we took them off for safe storage after)

This car truly is an original, low miles, high optioned car.  It is extremely straight and virtually rust free (check out the pictures).

The only body damage I could find is a small ding on the driver side rear (see pic), 2 small indents on the front quarter panel where the door hinges are from over extending. and one pinhole on the lower passenger side quarter panel.  Other than those issues, I could find no rust (floors are super solid) or other body damage.


Door Data Plate Info

BODY     63E  
COLOR  J   
TRIM      05  
DATE     21D
DSO       54
AXLE      4
TRANS  
5

Please take a look at the pictures, read the entire description, and ask questions prior to bidding.  While I have described this Comet and its condition to the best of my ability, I encourage inspection prior to bidding.  I do not cancel bids for any reason and bid to buy as this is no reserve!  Only a cashiers check or cash will be accepted as payment. A $500 deposit is due by paypal within 24hrs of the auction ending. Buyer responsible for shipping. There is no warranty with this car. Sold as is where is.

If you are shipping the car, it is located in Walla Walla, WA 99362.

Please feel free to call with any questions.  Thank you!

Ben
(509) 301-4131



On Dec-22-13 at 19:07:40 PST, seller added the following information:

I have received several questions in the first two hours of the Comet being posted:

Q1.  What is your buy it now price or what will it take to end the auction early?
A1.  I do not have a buy it now price to end the auction early.  I will let the auction run its course and the Comet will go to the winning bidder.

Q2. 
If you consider ending the auction, please let me know beforehand.
A2.  See above question. (This auction will be completed through eBay and not ended early).

Q3.  When you started the car, did you drive it as well?
A3.  No, we simply hooked the fuel line up to an external gas tank and ran it at idle for several minutes.  We did not hear any unusual noises and the oil pressure was good.  The carburetor did flood after several minutes (needs to be rebuilt).

I will continue to add updates as additional questions come in.  Thank you!
Ben

Auto Services in Washington

Xtreme Car Audio & Tint ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Consumer Electronics
Address: 25951 104th Ave SE, Des-Moines
Phone: (253) 867-6090

West Seattle Brake Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 4464 37th Ave SW, Keyport
Phone: (206) 935-4350

United Battery Systems Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage, Automobile Accessories
Address: 438 Oregon Way, Longview
Phone: (360) 577-3833

Skys Auto Repair & Detailing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Car Wash
Address: 12620 Highway 99, Mukilteo
Phone: (425) 263-9442

Setina Manufacturing Co. ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 2926 Yelm Hwy SE, Lacey
Phone: (360) 491-6197

Salvage Yard Guru ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: Marshall
Phone: (509) 850-5072

Auto blog

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.

Junkyard Gem: 2007 Mercury Mariner Hybrid

Sat, Dec 19 2020

Once hybrid vehicles from Honda and Toyota proved to work well in the real world of American streets during the early 2000s, other U.S.-market manufacturers climbed aboard the gasoline-electric bandwagon. Ford introduced the Escape Hybrid for the 2005 model year and sales proved quite strong; its Mercury-badged sibling, the Mariner Hybrid, appeared the following year. The Mariner Hybrid never induced many vehicle shoppers to sign on the line which is dotted, despite gasoline prices going absolutely ape in 2008, though it remained available all the way through the Mercury brand's 2010 demise. Here's one of those rare trucks, found in a Denver-area yard last month. The Escape/Mariner Hybrids got amazing fuel economy for tall, truck-shaped machines, though the serious penny-pinchers with long commutes skipped anything built in the 21st century and began driving up the prices of the once-scorned Geo Metro XFi, gas-sipping champion of the previous decade. The Mercury brand was on the ropes by this time, with not much to distinguish the once-distinctive Mercury machines from their near-identical Ford counterparts. The 1999-2002 Cougar was the last Mercury sold here with no twin brothers over in the Ford showrooms. I do see the occasional Escape Hybrid in places like this, though such gas-saving small SUVs tend to retain their value well enough that it takes a crash to retire one. This Mariner Hybrid hit something hard and either flipped on its side or scraped a guardrail for some distance. The airbags deployed and, presumably, spared the occupants from serious injury. That's the good news. The bad news is that fixing this kind of damage to a 13-year-old vehicle made by a defunct brand just isn't worth it to insurance companies, hybrid-electric powertrain or not. We can assume that the battery pack lives on in another Escape/Mariner. Navigation, Bluetooth, and other features that were considered pretty slick in 2007. This truck was in pretty good shape until the very end. Jill Wagner proved that you can bury a Mercury emblem in volcanic soil and it will grow into a brand-new Mariner Hybrid. That's how science works! You can go to the same field and tap on a Mercury emblem, if you want to get a regular gasoline Mariner. Featured Gallery Junked 2007 Mercury Mariner Hybrid View 20 Photos Auto News Green Mercury Automotive History Crossover SUV Hybrid mercury mariner mercury mariner hybrid Junkyard Gems

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.