Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1992 Mercedes Benz 300e 4 Door Sedan on 2040-cars

US $3,500.00
Year:1992 Mileage:159900
Location:

Pomona, California, United States

Pomona, California, United States

Paint is faded and has a few minor dents, but, can be easily repaired if given a basic paint job which we were planning on doing, bought from original owner who kept car maintained regularly, Power sunroof, windows and side view mirrors, rear drivers side window started to have trouble rolling up, may need a new switch or regulator, has new battery (approximately 2 to 3 months old-need to check receipt), tires are in good condition, clean inside, slight tear on drivers backrest and a couple of very small tears on rear passenger seat from regular wear and tear, non smokers, original manuals with original Mercedes Benz leather holder. Hardly driven since we purchased it. We decided to sell it because we purchased a 2001 Mercedes 500S and do not need 4 vehicles. Great car for work or for a student. 

Auto Services in California

Z & H Autobody And Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 4738 Marine Ave, Lynwood
Phone: (310) 263-1040

Yanez RV ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Recreational Vehicles & Campers
Address: Gilman-Hot-Springs
Phone: (951) 526-9089

Yamaha Golf Cars Of Palm Spring ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Golf Cars & Carts
Address: 55955 Pga Blvd, Bermuda-Dunes
Phone: (760) 564-0400

Wilma`s Collision Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 25571 Dollar St, Dublin
Phone: (925) 484-2324

Will`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 770 Post St, San-Pablo
Phone: (415) 776-3543

Will`s Auto Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 2715 Geary Blvd, San-Pablo
Phone: (415) 563-8777

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

2013 Airstream Interstate 3500 EXT

Mon, 19 Aug 2013

LA To The Grand Canyon In The Mercedes-Benz Of RVs
Piloting an 8,500-pound motorized house down the highway is far from my idea of fun, yet inexplicably, I'm enjoying myself. My grin has nothing to do with my camper's handling, as this heavily accoutered Mercedes-Benz Sprinter drives like a 25-foot long breadbox. My smile has nothing to do with on-road stability, as the ten-foot-tall, slab-sided vehicle reacts to wind gusts like the vertical stabilizer on a Boeing jet. My delight has nothing to do with its throttle or braking response, either, as both are as numb as your forehead after the eighth beer.
This monstrosity makes me happy for one reason - my passengers are undeniably having a good time.

Mercedes was set to sell version of Nissan Titan, now Infiniti might instead

Wed, 18 Sep 2013

Mercedes-Benz Titan. Mercedes-Benz Frontier. Mercedes-Benz pickup truck. None of these things roll off the tongue particularly well. We'd like to think that's the reason Daimler opted to kill the idea of rebadged Titan and Frontier pickups from corporate ally Nissan. In reality, the execution before the Frankfurt Motor Show was due to more complicated issues.
Yes, Mercedes, byword for German luxury, style and quality, would have slapped a three-pointed star on a pair of Japanese pickup trucks that have failed to resonate with consumers in the world's largest truck market. That slapping of badges isn't much of an exaggeration, at least on the outside. According to the report from Road & Track, the truck's front clip would have been tweaked, but beyond that, the sheetmetal would have been unchanged. The interior would have received a more thorough going-over by the team at Mercedes, while the suspension and noise, vibration and harshness tuning would have also received significant attention.
The trucks would have ended up being sold through the light-commercial branch of Mercedes-Benz - the same folks that will happily sell you a Sprinter van - had the deal gone through. Issues arose, though, first with the engines. Mercedes wanted a wider range of powertrains to allow it to tune models for specific markets, while Nissan said it couldn't engineer the wide variety of engines that MB wanted to drop under the hood. For the smaller truck, meanwhile, MB was interested in a hybrid or plug-in variant, according to R&T, although this was also shot down by Nissan.