Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Mercedes-benz 190e 2.6 Sedan 4-door 2.6l on 2040-cars

US $2,695.00
Year:1989 Mileage:125300
Location:

Fort Washington, Maryland, United States

Fort Washington, Maryland, United States
Advertising:

 

Please read the complete description prior to bidding

 For your consideration is a 1989 Mercedes 190E. This car is not perfect , but is in great shape for an original 25 year old car.  I will use the pictures to try to show the imperfections as well as possible. The body is straight , and rust free. The paint has the usual nicks and scratches, but looks good for the age. The interior is in excellent condition. The engine starts easily and runs very well no matter what the outdoor temperature is. There is no smoke , or strange noises. The transmission needs replacement. All features work except for the speedometer/odometer. New items put on in last 1000 mi. Battery , CD player, FM/AM radio, radiator, exhaust system. This car may not be a show piece , but shows well for a 25 year old car that has had no paint work etc.

If you have any questions feel free to ask prior to the end of the sale. I can be reached directly at (2024097953)

I require a $ 500.00 deposit within 48 hrs of sale end. ( Can be made through PayPal)

I encourage you to stop by and inspect the car prior to the end of sale.

The winning bidder will be the new owner of the car at the end of sale, this is not a chance to come take it for a spin and negotiate.

Payment will be cash or cashier's check in person within 10 days of end of sale.

Auto Services in Maryland

Tyre`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 1955 Greenspring Dr, Hunt-Valley
Phone: (410) 252-8001

Sterling Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 21563 Cascades Pkwy, Gaithersburg
Phone: (703) 450-5895

R & A Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 6136 Reisterstown RD, Govans
Phone: (410) 318-8399

Potomac Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 14550 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Bryans-Road
Phone: (703) 490-6227

Meineke Car Care Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1233 Liberty Rd-Rt 26, Marriottsville
Phone: (410) 970-6788

John`s Rv & Trailer Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service, Trailers-Repair & Service
Address: 257 N Main St, Freeland
Phone: (717) 428-0328

Auto blog

Mercedes GLE to debut in NY, will get plug-in variant

Mon, Jan 12 2015

On the eve of the 2015 Detroit Auto Show, Dieter Zetsche, Chairman of Daimler AG, said that 2015 will be the "Year of the SUV" at Mercedes-Benz. This means a host of new and updated sport-utility and crossover models, kicked off with the debut of the GLE-Class Coupe (pictured above) – in 450 AMG Sport and Mercedes-AMG GLE63 variants – here in the Motor City. But there's far more in store throughout the year. First, Mercedes has confirmed it will debut the non-coupe GLE-Class – the M-Class replacement – at the New York Auto Show in April. It will share most of its architecture with the GLE Coupe revealed here in Detroit, but will also come with a plug-in hybrid option. Mercedes-Benz debuted an S-Class Plug-In Hybrid at the Los Angeles Auto Show last November, and will expand this technology to other core models in its range. First, we will see the C350 Plug-In Hybrid, which also makes its debut here in Detroit. Beyond that, Mercedes has confirmed that the GLE-Class will benefit from a plug-in option, as will the upcoming GLC-Class crossover – the renamed replacement for the GLK. No official timing has been given for the GLC, but Mercedes confirms that both it and its largest utility vehicle – the GLS-Class (currently known as the GL-Class) – will debut "later this year." Year of the SUV, indeed. Featured Gallery 2016 Mercedes-AMG GLE63 Coupe View 9 Photos Green Detroit Auto Show New York Auto Show Mercedes-Benz Crossover SUV Hybrid Luxury PHEV 2015 Detroit Auto Show mercedes glk-class mercedes gl-class mercedes gle-class mercedes glc-class mercedes gls-class

Rolls-Royce Cullinan, Mercedes-AMG E 53 and BMW 2 Series | Autoblog Podcast #734

Fri, Jun 17 2022

In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore and Senior Editor, Consumer, Jeremy Korzeniewski kick things off with a discussion of the Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the future of the brand. The Mercedes-AMG E-Class is next up, followed by the BMW 2 Series Coupe.  Next, Senior West Coast Editor James Riswick reports from the ground at the first drive of the latest Honda HR-V. Our hosts revisit the week's news, including automakers requesting a lift of the EV federal tax credit cap, Chevy giving us a peek at its electric Blazer, and Ford recalling millions of vehicles, including about half of all the Mustang Mach-E EVs it has sold. Finally, our guys dig through the mailbag to help a reader decide whether to purchase a Ford Focus ST or another hot hatch. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Autoblog Podcast #734 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving Rolls-Royce Cullinan Mercedes-AMG E 53 BMW 2 Series Coupe Dispatch from the 2023 Honda HR-V first drive event GM, Ford, Toyota, Stellantis CEOs want EV tax credit cap lifted 2024 Chevy Blazer EV partly revealed, details coming in July Ford recalls Mustang Mach-E, includes stop-sale order Ford recalls 3 million other vehicles Spend my money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related video:

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.