Rx7, Ls1, Tr6060, Mazda, Samberg, Jtr, Turn One, Silver, Touring, Coupe, Sunroof on 2040-cars
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
1993 Silver Touring
93k on chassis Samberg mounting, with diff brace, and bump steer kit 83k on 2001 Firebird LS1 TR6060 lvl 6 from RPM Transmissions, Monster Stage 2 clutch Driveshaft Shop Driveshaft with Porsche CV joint to trans, beefy spicer U-joint to diff. Factory 2010 Camaro shifter (Hurst Edition) JTR 1 3/4’’ headers with V-Bands Rebuilt 3.9 Auto Diff from KAAZ USA, with a KAAZ LSD Body is an 8/10, there are some dings/chips. 99% have touch up paint on them I believe, but could use touching up again I’m sure. Pez Harness, A/C wires installed Hinson Radiator/Fan setup. PC680 Battery in passenger rear bin Turn One Power Steering Pump Pez P/S Lines Tick Remote Speed Bleeder for Slave Cylinder Tick S/S clutch line to master cylinder wrapped in heat wrap. Interior: Kirkey intermediate bucket on FRSport brackets "custom" fabbed to work together. Read:hammer. Works, slides back and forth, just isn't pretty in the details. Factory Seats, good condition, drivers has some wear, but no rips. Carpet in good condition, little dirty Door panels in very good condition, drivers still has working lid/pocket, center console is in great condition, out of car since I didn’t want to break it. Rear bins in good condition, passenger side top is off due to continuously messing with the battery Rear shelf in good condition All gauges work except Oil Pressure, the sending unit I bought from forum member blew up, haven’t found a replacement. Currently the hole is plugged with a brand new GM oil sending unit, maybe you can get that to work? Dakota Digital box, have not set it up for the 3.9 rear end yet though. Momo Steering Wheel - stock will come with as well. Exterior: Sakebomb Garage HID headlights Stock wheels with Hankook RS3’s with decent life left (I did autoX it last year) Pretty much stock look. Nothing fancy. Spent money elsewhere. Glass is all in great shape all around. Extras: Improved Racing Oil Pan Baffle – F Body Pan. BNIB. Improved Racing Oil Cooler Kit – Setrab 25 row oil cooler, lines, AN Fittings, thermostat. BNIB. Tons of stock parts (subframe, bose parts, ABS unit, misc diff parts) All lights, accessories, locks, windows, heat, wipers work. E brake ground wire broke off the lever. Haven’t fixed that yet. The Bad: No exhaust. Wouldn’t fit the new trans, haven’t made a new one as it just sits in a garage currently. 3.9 Diff has NOT been broken in yet. About 7 miles on it to get it from shop to home. Haven’t found a place to break it in. No A/C Oil Pan brushes the steering rack currently. We are working on remedying that with a new/modified mount. Could use finishing touches on the shifter install etc. Works, I made a shift plate out of a piece of a Peterbilt, and I like it, but its personal preference of course. Feel free to change it up. This car has Honda, Acura, Peterbilt, GM, and Mazda parts on it |
Mazda RX-7 for Sale
1991 mazda rx-7 convertible convertible 2-door 1.3l(US $1,500.00)
1993 mazda rx-7 base coupe 2-door 1.3l(US $14,000.00)
Two mazda rx-7
**must see**rare find**one adult owner**twin turbo**clean carfax**no accidents**(US $18,995.00)
1985 mazda rx-7 gls
1988 mazda rx-7 convertible convertible 2-door 1.3l(US $9,900.00)
Auto Services in Wisconsin
Yarish Auto Sales ★★★★★
Westway Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
West Allis Auto Body ★★★★★
Tire-Rifik ★★★★★
Sound World ★★★★★
Sound Decisions ★★★★★
Auto blog
This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location
Thu, Apr 28 2016Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.
Consumer Reports declares most and least loved cars [w/video]
Wed, Dec 3 2014Consumer Reports is crunching the numbers from its annual owner-satisfaction survey, and part of that process is finding out how attached drivers are to their cars. CR simply asks readers of models up to three years old if they would buy the same vehicle again in light of their entire ownership experience, and tallies the results. After looking at the responses for about 350,000 vehicles, it turns out that people really love a certain California-built, electrically powered luxury sedan. That's right, this year's the overall winner was the Tesla Model S with a whopping 98 percent of owners saying they would purchase another one (the Model S also won this award last year, with 99 percent satisfaction). The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray came in a close second with 95 percent of drivers hoping to park another one in their garage. A few models weren't quite so favored, though. The Nissan Versa Sedan was the least loved model among its owners; a mere 42 percent said that they would purchase another. The aging Jeep Compass didn't do much better, with just 43 percent of drivers willing to buy the softroader again. On average, about 70 percent of owners say they would buy their car again, and only four cars ranked below 50 percent in CR's findings. Check out the video above to see some of the winners and losers in a few of CR's categories. If you're a subscriber, you can check out the full list on its website. Related Gallery Consumer Reports Most Loved Cars 2014 Related Gallery Consumer Reports Least Loved Cars 2014 News Source: Consumer Reports - sub. req., Consumer Reports via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Mazda Mercedes-Benz Porsche Subaru Tesla Ownership Videos car ownership
Mazda RT24-P brings KODO style to the Rolex 24 at Daytona
Thu, Nov 17 2016In addition to its new CX-5 crossover, Mazda revealed its new racecar, the RT24-P, at the Los Angeles Auto Show. The car has been designed for the Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in IMSA's WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and will make its racing debut at the Rolex 24 at Daytona. It was designed using Mazda's KODO design language, which the brand has so successfully applied to its road-going cars. The racer's relation to Mazda's production cars is made obvious by the small five-point grille at the tip of the RT24-P's nose. While plenty of credit needs to go to the stylists and aerodynamicists at Mazda and Multimatic, one of the companies Mazda partnered with on the car, some of the credit needs to go to IMSA's new DPi rules for 2017. The new DPi class is very similar to the LMP2 class that it competes with in the WeatherTech series, with some noteworthy differences. The DPi class allows manufacturers to create unique bodies and engine packages for one of the four chassis available. The LMP2 class requires competitors to use the chassis companies' bodies, and are restricted to one engine package. View 14 Photos As for the powertrain, the Mazda RT24-P uses a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder that puts out roughly 600 horsepower. Mazda used the same engine in its P2-class race car last season. Mazda's body and engine will ride atop a chassis developed by Riley Technologies and Multimatic. You may remember that latter company as the one that developed the awesome spool valve shocks on the Chevrolet Colorado ZR2. The RT24-P will be campaigned by Speedsource, a company that has been racing Mazdas in American endurance racing for years, including last year's P2 cars. Considering Mazda's success in making such a cool race car, we're excited to see what other manufacturers do with the extra design freedom of the DPi class. Both Chevrolet and Ford competed last year in the WeatherTech prototype class with Daytona Prototype-style cars, and Honda competed with an LMP-style racer. Depending on what other makes decide, this year's WeatherTech line-up could have some nifty designs. Related Video: Related Gallery 2017 Mazda RT24-P race car View 9 Photos News Source: Mazda, IMSAImage Credit: Live photos copyright 2016 Drew Phillips / Autoblog Motorsports LA Auto Show Mazda Racing Vehicles Videos Original Video 2016 LA Auto Show