Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Mazda Protege 5 (black On Black) 5 Speed Manual Lower Miles on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:109526 Color: The body is in great shape overall
Location:

Plano, Illinois, United States

Plano, Illinois, United States
Advertising:

I’m selling my 2002 Mazda Prot'eg'e 5 Hatchback 5 speed manual vehicle.  I’m not sure how many owners there were before me however I bought this car of my friend back in May of 2012 with about 96,000 miles on it.  He had just bought if from a car dealer in Iowa about 3 months before (around Feb-March 2012) as his personal everyday driver.  About 2 months after he got it, he was in the left turn lane and someone hit him from behind in the rear right side underneath the tail light.  So, insurance gave him the option to collect or fix it.  I needed a 4 cylinder car at that time really bad as a gas saver so my friend and I worked it out since the damage was very minimal and he got what he needed out of it and I got a car to fix up and drive.  The title is clean and always has been.  Not a salvage or rebuild.  Normal title which I have in hand.  So the car now has just over 109,000 miles on it as I’ve had it for about 17 months and it’s been an all around great car.  Only reason I’m selling it is because I’m in my brother’s truck 99% of the time and at this point that’s what I need.  It’s a great gas saver at about 30+ miles per gallon.  I think it holds about 12-13 gallons and I get about 400 miles or so to a tank give or take. It’s mostly been used for meetings or local use. So with that said, I either drive 5-10 miles round trip, or 150+ round trip.  It’s not a city stop and go car however the amount of traffic these days is insane so yes, it does get its use in that form.  Ok now for the details.

 

The back right rear side was hit right at the bumper and underneath the tail light.  The light itself was not hit or the actual metal outside frame of the body however the impact at about 10 miles an hour caused the light to break.  Not to worry the air bags etc are all fine and never deployed as this was a light accident as your every day fender bender.  After I bought the car from my buddy, I ordered all OEM new parts from Mazda in Naperville, Illinois.  The parts are listed below.  I had a body shop guy do it on the side.  For the most part, it’s pretty decent.  It’s not 100% like it was before it was hit, but vary close.  Because it’s a hatch back, it through that out of place a bit and it had to be realigned.  It’s pretty much dead on as well as the rest of the parts but obviously can’t be fixed back to 100%.  The tail light is off by about 1/8 of an inch as well as the rest of the right side.  So no, it’s not off by much.  An average everyday person wouldn’t even notice.  The paint was a special order to match and I have some left over.  It’s actually a special OEM matched paint in a spray can.  No, this isn’t a cheap spray paint etc that is like $5.  This was specially mixed from the Napa Paint store to OEM spec and was about $30 a can.   There is a huge difference in the fact that this is pressurized a certain way to make the spray form even like being painted in a body shop.  You wouldn’t want to do your whole care with this or large areas, but for bumpers etc it’s perfect and what it’s made for.  So with all that said below is a list of parts I bought.  I can provide all receipts for EVERYTHING.

 

INTERIOR:

The interior is like brand new.  No holes, stains, etc at all.  I challenge you to find a better interior on a car this old.  I’m not a smoker and can verify from the owners before.  No pets or kids either.  The only thing I can think of as being wrong with interior is the driver’s floor by the left foot rest is a little wore out.  There are scuffs on the back hatch interior panels form normal use but the rest of the car is like new. I’d rate it at a 9 out of 10.

 Exterior:

The body is in great shape overall.  There are some minor surface rust spots starting to pop up around the back rear fenders.  Otherwise pretty good every where else as far as I can tell.  There are some minor scuffs from age but overall I’d rate it at a 7 out of 10 because of the minor rust and the back end being fixed.  Don’t get me wrong, the hatch etc works fine and doesn’t leak at all.  I guess it’s just me knowing the fact that it was in a minor accident and I’m someone who always looks at things like that.  If I thought the car was too bad or a piece of junk I wouldn’t have purchased it.  However again I needed it.

The wheels have flaking.  I think the person from Iowa either never washed it when there was salt on the roads in the winter time, or washed it way too much.  Not sure but I think that’s why.

 

ENGINE:

The motor is a 2.0 vary strong!  No issues at all.  I just replaced the Purge valve sensor under the hood, and also the vent solenoid valve in the rear because the check engine light came on and showed an EVAP code.  Pretty much harmless however I fix things when they break.  The light has been cleared and 100% fixed.  Other than that I have done the regular tune-ups every 3000-3500 miles. I did the last oil change at 108,500 miles. Starts and runs vary strong.  No leaks. Belts etc look great.  

 

Drivetrain:

Shifts vary smooth and catches every gear with no issues at all.  The clutch seems to still be strong as well.   No grinding etc.  No problems at all.

 

Suspension:

I actually just had it up at my mechanic last month and had him put it on the lift to see what it would need soon.  The car itself seems a little bouncy in the front as I mentioned to him and he stated that it could need a new strut assembly on the front end which is about $550.00 with parts and labor.  Other than that the rest is fine.  Below you can read what new parts I’ve put on it.  He did say the front end looked good though.  The rear end has a whole new strut assembly installed as of about 10 months ago along with some end links.

 

 

Tires:

Back are new within the last year and fronts have about 20% life left and are worn even.  The right front leaks 50% of all it’s air out with in about 2-3 days now that it is colder.  I don’t think it’s the valve stem.  I think the tire is just too dry on the inside and when a new set is installed, it should be fine.

 

Exhaust:

I had to put a new lower pipe with a new O2 sensor off the manifold because the exhaust got pushed in a little bit from the accident.  I bought all OEM parts from Mazda again and had and exhaust shop do the work.  Overall it’s good and strong.

 

All New Parts as of May 2012 till now.

*OEM rear bumper

*Rear Frame Support with Energy stabilizer

*Tail light assembly,

Total $500.00 for body parts and 500.00 labor ( all done 17 months ago)

*Muffler $75.00 (done 17 months ago)

*Exhaust manifold with O2 sensor $325.00 (done 17 months ago)

*Wheel Alignment $65.00 (done 10 months ago)

*Rear End Stabilizer Links $45 (done about 1 year ago)

* Rear Shocks & Struts $535.00 (done about 10 months ago)

 *Rear Brake Calipers, Rotors, Pads $300.00 (done about 4 months ago)

*Front Rotors, Brake pads $125.00 (done 1 month ago)

*Purge Valve Sensor $115.00 (done 2 months ago)

*Purge Solenoid Vent Valve $165.00 (done 1 month ago)

Oil & Filter change (just done at 108,500 miles)

Overall the car runs and drives good.  It’s a 2002 so yes it has age on it and every now and then has a noise/rattles or something as you drive on different roads but it’s still a vary good, dependable car.  If I don’t get what I feel it’s worth then I’ll keep it and use it as a long distance driver to keep mile off my new truck.  I can back up everything I stated above and provide you with anything you need so you are comfortable with buying the car.  Feel free to run a car-fax.  I have no clue if the accident will come up because it was so minor but I wanted to be open and honest about it as everything else I stated to.  Feel free to call me and/or message me anytime for further details or just to chat about it if it makes you feel more comfortable.  I will answer every question honestly to the best of my knowledge.  Also feel free to take it for a test drive as well.  I do have the title in hand and as I stated, it’s clear and has always been clear.  This was not a salvaged or rebuild title because I would not have purchased it then. And no nothing shady is going on and this is not a money flipper haha.  I bought this to drive it and got my use but now need a truck.

 

Thanks

Jason

(630) 849-0426 cell.

Auto Services in Illinois

Woodfield Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 700 W Higgins Rd, Hoffman-Estates
Phone: (847) 310-1900

West Side Tire and Alignment ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 2091 W Station St, Kankakee
Phone: (815) 933-7080

U Pull It Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Wrecking, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4555 W North Ave, Berwyn
Phone: (773) 489-2277

Trailside Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 40W288 Wasco Rd, South-Elgin
Phone: (847) 854-6700

Tony`s Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 37W415 Keslinger Rd, Batavia
Phone: (630) 306-0266

Tim`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 6505 Main St, Village-Of-Lakewood
Phone: (815) 923-4780

Auto blog

Mazda patents show rotary engine for range-extended EV

Fri, Mar 17 2017

Two years ago, Mazda introduced a fascinating range-extended electric car called the Mazda2 RE Range-Extender. It took an electric Mazda2, and dropped in an itty-bitty 330cc rotary engine. It wasn't the rotary-powered sports car we had hoped for, but it seemed like a unique way to keep the quirky engine alive and kicking. But not long after the car's reveal, it seemed to disappear. Now the basic idea has resurfaced with a few modern updates in a couple of US patents. The first patent is pretty straightforward and describes a range-extended EV similar to the BMW i3. At the front is an electric motor driving the front wheels. At the back is an internal combustion engine that powers an electric generator. In the middle is a lithium-ion battery for storing and delivering electricity. It's the same set-up as that Mazda2. The second patent is for an engine start-and-stop system, but specifically for rotary engines. The system is designed to shut off a rotary engine when not needed, much as modern piston engines do. It also stops the rotor in a position that closes the intake port to ensure no fuel or exhaust emissions slip out through the intake tract. This is necessary since there are no valves in a rotary, and air and exhaust come through ports that are "opened" and "closed" by the rotor itself. The patent also describes the possibility of firing a spark plug after the fuel has been cut to eliminate any leftover fuel emissions. This system would theoretically improve a rotary engine's fuel economy and emissions significantly, which would be a boon as those are two of the rotary's major weaknesses. The rotary-engine patent also includes the same range-extended powertrain drawing as the first patent. It's there as a description of a possible application. And in such an application, where the rotary wouldn't have to run all the time, the system could take advantage of the rotary's inherent strengths. Weight can be kept low thanks to the engine's small dimensions, which should help in keeping the car sprightly and efficient. Rotaries are renowned for smoothness, too, so it shouldn't need too much refining and sound deadening, the latter of which adds more weight. The small size would also help with packaging, leaving more space for people, cargo, or possibly batteries. And since it has been patented, the company may be looking to bring the system to market.

Mazda's Tokyo concepts have us wishing for more Mazdaspeed

Wed, Dec 30 2015

It's been a while since we've seen any new Mazdaspeed machinery, and we're sorry to report that today isn't the day the wait ends. But if you want to see what they might look like based on Mazda's latest models, the Tokyo Auto Salon will be the place to be in a couple of weeks. Turns out the Zoom-Zoom brand has a whole raft of performance models in store for the aftermarket expo. Most intriguing to our eyes is the trio of Racing concepts – one based on the MX-5 Miata roadster, one on the CX-3 crossover, and one on the Mazda6 sedan. Each is done up in black with full aero kit, new rolling stock, and Alcantara interior. An adjustable suspension is the big change to the MX-5 – known simply as the Mazda Roadster in Japan – which also features red trim. As does the CX-3, while the Atenza (which we know as the Mazda6) goes for a more monochromatic, murdered-out appearance. The rally-prepped Mazda2 (known domestically as the Demio) focuses on a stripped-out interior with bucket seats, racing harnesses and a roll cage. There's a spec racing MX-5 in white livery with roll cage and tow hooks as well to join the Global Cup roadster we've already seen. That also goes for the RX-Vision and LM55 Vision Grand Turismo concepts which have already made the rounds but will be on display at the Tokyo salon as well. But it's those three Racing concepts that leave us salivating for production performance models to come – and hopefully come to North America in the process. Related Video:

Consumer Reports says infotainment systems 'growing first-year reliability plague'

Mon, 27 Oct 2014

The Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability Survey (right) is out, and the top two spots look much the same as last year's list with Lexus and Toyota in first and second place, respectively. However, there are some major shakeups for 2014, with Acura plunging eight spots from third in 2013 to 11th this year, and Mazda replaces it on the lowest step of the podium. Honda and Audi round out the top five. This year's list includes six Japanese brands in the top 10, two Europeans, one America and one Korean.
Acura isn't the only one taking a tumble, though. Infiniti is the biggest loser this year by dropping 14 spots to 20th place. Other big losses come from Mercedes-Benz with an 11-place fall to 24th, and GMC, which declines 10 positions to 19th.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, it's not traditional mechanical bugs hauling down these automaker's reliability scores. Instead, pesky problems with infotainment systems are taking a series toll on the rankings. According to Consumer Reports, complaints about "in-car electronics" were the most grumbled about element in new cars. Problem areas included things like unresponsive touchscreens, issues pairing phones and multi-use controllers that refused to work right.