Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Lincoln Continental Lehmann-peterson Executive Limo Extremely Rare!!!! on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:0 Color: of the body
Location:

Hanover, Pennsylvania, United States

Hanover, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:U/K
Engine:7.6L 7582CC 462Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 6Y80G421532 Year: 1966
Mileage: 0
Make: Lincoln
Model: Continental
Trim: Base
Number of Cylinders: 8
Drive Type: U/K
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Lehmann-Peterson was founded in 1963 when Robert "Pete" Peterson met George "Skip" Lehmann. Robert Peterson was in auto racing and for many years he was a chief mechanic, building racers for use at Indianapolis. George Lehmann at the age of 21 had recieved a large inheritance from his father who died in Boston's Coconut Grove Night Club fire.

In a small Chicago garage on Harlem Avenue they took a 1963 Lincoln cut it in half and added a 34 inch stretch. They also added their plaque which read "Executive Limousine by Lehmann-Peterson". Only one prototype was constructed in the Harlem Avenue garage. (When production began, operations were moved to a shop at 2710 North Sawyer Avenue and one on Armitage Street)

Ford was impressed with the 1963 prototype especially the seating arrangement which created a conversation area atmosphere. Ford kept the car for further testing being concerned about safety and the strength of the frame with the additional length. Then on February 25, 1964, after 40,000 miles of testing, Ford and Lehmann-Peterson reached an agreement.

It was first displayed at the New York International Automobile Show in April, 1964. Over the next 6 years Lehmann-Peterson produced around 600 limousines for government official, business executive, numerous celebrities including Jackie Gleason, Spencer Tracy, The Supremes, The Rolling Stones, Sophia Loren, Jerry Lewis, Robert Vaughn, Victor Borge, Senator Robert Kennedy, Aristotle Onassis and even a 1964 "Popemobile".

A Lehmann-Peterson Limousine treatment of a standard Lincoln Continental Sedan usually took 27 days to complete in the small northwest Chicago shop employing about 40 men (Lehmann said there were six shop employees. So either there were fewer, or the other people employed did not work regularly in the shop).

2.5 days  Disassembly of the factory sedan, removal of pertinent interior components, mechanical and electrical parts, to begin cuffing the unibody.
2.5 days  Work of the welding rack, including finishing the cut, setting up the weld of the extension, including the addition of much structural steel.
2.5 days  Installation of roof portion of body, the extended drive shaft, extended fuel line, extended brake line, and the modified exhaust system.
2.5 days  Installation, alignment, and welding of center panels.
2.5 days  Painting the exterior of the body.
5.0 days  Installation of wiring, air conditioning, heater.
2.5 days  Installation of interior headliner and exterior vinyl top.
5.0 days  Fitting and completion of interior upholstery, carpet, and trim.
2.5 days  Testing vehicle and polishing the exterior.

27.0 days  Total required for the Lehmann-Peterson conversion.

Lincoln did not like to admit it, but these limos were even more rigid than the already super-rigid unibody production cars


Pricing:

Our prices to dealers, and suggested retail prices, for Executive Limousine conversion elements are set forth below. We recommend that in selling the Executive Limousine, you quote it at one complete figure (plus additional options and transportation charges a rather than breaking the price down into separate basic car and conversion prices. This will help establish the car as a finished integral unit as well as maximize your profit opportunity.

  

Dealer Cost

Suggested
Retail Price

Basic Lincoln Continental Sedan Unit

$6292.00

$6378.50

Mandatory Limousine Conversion Kit (b)

$66.40

$86.50

Executive Limousine Conversion

$7537.50

$8775.00

Rear compartment air-conditioning unit (c)

$262.50

$350.00

Chauffeur compartment divider window

$187.50

$250.00

Built-in television set, including
a Sony television set (Model 5303, 5"
screen size)



$221.25


$295.00


PLEASE CHECK INFORMATION FOR YOURSELF PLEASE


1 OF ONLY 600 EVER PRODUCED FROM 1963-1970 
CAR HAS SEVERE SIGNS OF SITTING THE PAST 30 COUPLE YEARS

DON'T MISS OUT ON A RARE OPPORTUNITY  .01 NO RESERVE AUCTION

FROM WHAT I CAN TELL ALL PHONES TVS, ECT ARE STILL IN CAR WHICH I DON'T THINK YOU COULD EVER FIND AGAIN  
EVEN HAS POWER GLASS BETWEEN DRIVER AND PASSENGER WITH PHONES TO COMMUNICATE
ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE ASK 

DOORS OPEN SHUT WITHOUT DROP OR SAG AND WITH LITTLE EFFORT 
I THINK STRUCTURALLY CAR IS SOUND 
I DON'T SEE WHERE ITS A HARD RESTORE BEING THEY STRETCHED  A CAR 34 INCHES THE HARD PIECES OF GLASS AND TRIM ECT ARE STILL THEIR  
AGAIN CAR HAS BEEN SITTING 30 YEARS ONLY 10 OUTSIDE 
PLEASE VIEW PICTURES AND ASK QUESTIONS 
HAVE A REGULAR 1967 LINCOLN ALSO UP FOR AUCTION GREAT PARTS DONOR

 


On Aug-27-13 at 04:10:52 PDT, seller added the following information:

I HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT CAR PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THIS CAR HAS BEEN SITTING 30 YEARS IT NEEDS RESTORED AND NEEDS WORK YOU CANNOT DRIVE IT IN THE CONDITION ITS IN 

NO IT WONT START AND DRIVE IF YOU PUT A BATTERY IN IT TO NORTH CAROLINA

IT IS UP FOR AUCTION AS IS WHERE IS FOR PARTS OR A RESTORE PROJECT 
I WOULD SUGGEST A ROLL BACK IF YOU ARE WINNING BIDDER NOT A BUMPER CAR DOLLY 

REAR WINDOW IS MISSING FOR HOW LONG I DON'T KNOW 
AGAIN ANY QUESTIONS OR ADDITIONAL PICTURES PLEASE ASK 

THE CAR IS RESTORE ABLE DUE TO THE LIMITED NUMBERS OF THESE PRODUCED BUT I IMAGINE YOU WILL NEED EXPERIENCE IN THIS AREA AND ITS NOT A ONE WEEKEND PROJECT

THANKS


Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Witmer`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 340 Fickes Rd, Highspire
Phone: (717) 432-3570

West End Sales & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2746 Walbert Ave, Germansville
Phone: (610) 433-2661

Walter`s Auto Wrecking ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: Birmingham
Phone: (814) 696-0310

Tony`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Geigertown
Phone: (484) 334-0838

T S E`s Vehicle Acces Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 21 Cloister AVE, Newmanstown
Phone: (717) 738-2225

Supreme Auto Body Works, Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2011 Walbert Ave, Bushkill
Phone: (610) 432-9000

Auto blog

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

2020 Ford Explorer safer than old model; crash test ratings short of Top Safety Pick

Mon, Dec 16 2019

The 2020 Ford Explorer three-row crossover has improved on the outgoing model in many ways. According to the IIHS, it has also improved in a number of safety categories, but not enough to earn a Top Safety Pick award. The culprit is not the headlight performance for once. The Explorer's headlights were given an "Acceptable" rating, which would be sufficient for Top Safety Pick, if not Top Safety Pick +. Where the Ford falls short is in the front small overlap driver-side crash test, in which it got the second highest "Acceptable" rating. The IIHS requires a "Good" rating in this category, whereas an "Acceptable" rating on the passenger side would be, well, acceptable for Top Safety Pick. According to IIHS, Ford will be reviewing the results to figure out what the issue is, and it will likely make revisions to future Explorers to improve the result. Other than the one test, the Explorer performed admirably. It received a "Good" rating in all other crash categories except the passenger-side small overlap that was not tested. Both its standard and optional forward collision prevention systems had the highest "Superior" ratings, with the standard one preventing a collision with a car at speeds of up to 25 mph, and the optional one avoiding a collision at 12 mph, and "nearly" preventing one at 25 mph. Headlights are rated as "Acceptable" and so is access to child seat LATCH anchors. Also worth noting is that the Explorer's crash test ratings apply to its luxurious twin the 2020 Lincoln Aviator, meaning it also doesn't get a Top Safety Pick rating. The forward collision system performed the same as in the Ford, and the only difference between the two was in headlight performance. The Lincoln's standard headlights, included on the base, Reserve and Grand Touring trims, have the second-lowest "Marginal" rating, but the optional headlights for those trims, and the standard ones on the Black Label trim, received the "Good" rating. Among three-row Explorer competitors, the Honda Pilot, Hyundai Santa Fe XL, Kia Telluride, Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota Highlander all have a Top Safety Pick. The Hyundai Palisade, Mazda CX-9, Subaru Ascent, and the slightly smaller Kia Sorento and Volkswagen Tiguan all have a Top Safety Pick +. As for Lincoln Aviator competitors, the Cadillac XT6, Infiniti QX60, Lexus RX and Volvo XC90 get a Top Safety Pick. The Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class and two-row-only BMW X5 get the Top Safety Pick + rating. Related Video:      

Ford applies to trademark term 'Lincoln eGlide'

Thu, Apr 30 2020

There's an epilogue to Ford's recent announcement that it's giving up on a battery-electric Lincoln co-developed with Rivian. The MachEClub forum discovered that just a week ago, Ford applied with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to trademark the term "Lincoln eGlide." The goods and services category details use for "Motor vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, sport utility vehicles, electric vehicles and structural parts and fittings; electric vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, sport utility vehicles, and structural parts and fittings." Living in an age where a small "e" is shorthand for "electric," and Ford having specified electric vehicles in the patent, the go-to guess is that this is for an electric vehicle. The inclusion of non-electric motor vehicles injects a little fuzziness. Tesla's trademark on the Model S specifies "electric automobiles" only, whereas Rivian's trademark for the R1T seeks coverage for "land vehicles" and just about every part found in or on a land vehicle.   Since Ford must have known about the end of the Rivian effort when it applied for the trademark, we suppose Lincoln has got some kind of eGlide coming no matter what. Lincoln refers to the theme of its latest cabin designs, as in the Aviator and Corsair, "Quiet Flight," and the road-scanning adaptive suspension on the Lincoln Aviator is called "Air Glide," neither term being trademarked. This leads our suspicions to eGlide becoming a vehicle component that could potentially serve a model with any powertrain, not necessarily battery-electric only, and eGlide won't be the name of the Lincoln EV that Ford says is still on the way. Another clue is that Ford included the word "Lincoln" in the term. Trademarked vehicle names such as Aviator and Corsair don't include the make, but services for vehicles do, such as the trademarks for Lincoln Connect and Lincoln Co-Pilot 360. We'll admit that a little bit of hope informs this line of thinking as well. Ford having done Lincoln the fabulous service of giving Lincolns terrific names, we'd be aghast if the Corsair and Navigator had to share showroom space with an eGlide. We've no choice but to wait for a retail product to provide answers. In the meantime, if we could just get to the bottom of this "Fastor Charge" trademark, and what's this bit about "Vandemonium?"   Related Video:       Â