Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Kia Rio Lx Sedan Great Mpg, Rare Color, Perfect Carfax, Excellent Shape on 2040-cars

Year:2009 Mileage:56000 Color: Orange /
 Black
Location:

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:1.6L 1599CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: knade223596461997 Year: 2009
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Kia
Model: Rio
Trim: LX Sedan 4-Door
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4
Mileage: 56,000
Exterior Color: Orange
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Interior Color: Black
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

For sale is a 2009 Kia Rio with just under 59,000 miles. This vehicle is in excellent shape with no dings or scratches. The interior is also very clean. Perfect car fax. Although the pictures are at a dealer I am a private owner selling the car. It is currently sitting at my friends dealer in case he sells it first. If bought through me, equals private sale and NO sales tax!! All inquires and test drives welcome.
This car is priced to sell. Below is a link to the KBB value for reference.

http://www.kbb.com/kia/rio/2009-kia-rio/lx-sedan-4d/?pricetype=private-party&vehicleid=226746&intent=trade-in-sell&mileage=56000&category=sedan&options=2286674%7ctrue%7c2286676%7ctrue%7c2286700%7ctrue

Asking $8,995 obo. This is good looking color combo with excellent gas mileage.

If interested please call Ryan at 770) 231--6974 or email at rlangino (at) aol .com

Auto Services in Georgia

Valdosta Toyota Scion ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2980 James Cir, Valdosta
Phone: (229) 247-1920

US Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Financing Services
Address: 3485 Centerville Highway, Avondale-Est
Phone: (866) 438-5202

Turns Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile & Truck Brokers
Address: 1755 The Exchange SE, Powder-Springs
Phone: (678) 401-3732

Troy`s Complete Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1501 Montgomery St, Allenhurst
Phone: (912) 349-1939

Tint Guy ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 10262 Main St Ste 110, Vinings
Phone: (770) 592-4265

The Jw Auto Group ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1955 Panola Rd, Conley
Phone: (678) 289-8531

Auto blog

Next-gen Kia Sedona drops more camo, shows KV7 cues

Thu, 15 Aug 2013

It was just two weeks ago that we saw our first glimpse of the 2015 Kia Sedona testing in full camouflage, but now Kia has stripped away some of the heavy cladding to give us an even better idea what its new minivan will look like. As we pointed out before, the next Sedona doesn't use as many design cues from the 2012 Kia KV7 as we initially hoped, but it should be interesting enough to stand out from the current crop of minivans.
Even though most of the body is still covered with the black and white pattern and the side doors still have cladding, these spy shots show off plenty of details about the new Sedona. Starting up front, Kia gave its minivan a more upright shape that we've seen a lot of on current Kia designs, while the reduced camo also makes the van's new side window shape more obvious. This pinched daylight opening (DLO) along the side is the same as what we saw on the KV7, and the window line dips back down again for the liftgate glass. While we're focused on the rear of the Sedona, that liftgate spoiler looks a lot like what we're used to seeing on the back of a Porsche Cayenne.
Kia has still yet to announce when its new minivan will be unveiled, but as things seem to be pretty far along in development, we'd expect to see something on the 2015 Sedona fairly soon.

Porsche tops J.D. Power quality index as Korean brands soar

Thu, Jun 18 2015

While complaints about infotainment systems remain a thorn in the side of automakers for J.D. Power's annual Initial Quality Study, there's a lot to celebrate this year. The average number of problems reported per 100 vehicles fell to 112 in 2015 – a three-percent improvement compared to 116 in 2014. The results of this year's survey are based on the responses of over 84,000 people about problems within the first 90 days of buying or leasing a 2015 model-year vehicle. For the third consecutive year, Porsche tops the rankings with an average of 80 problems per 100 vehicles. Although, that's slightly more than the 74 the German sportscar maker scored in 2014. "While the Japanese automakers continue to make improvements, we're seeing other brands, most notably Korean makes, really accelerating the rate of improvement," Renee Stephens, vice president of US automotive quality at J.D. Power, said in the study's release. In fact, Kia ranks as one of the biggest movers in this year's list. The Korean brand jumped to second place from seventh last year. The company had an average of 86 problems per 100 vehicles, a 20-point improvement. Third place went to Jaguar with an average of 93 problems reported, versus last year's second-place finish with 87 of them. Fourth place was Hyundai, and fifth-place Infiniti also earned a gold star for improvement with 97 issues per 100 vehicles – 31-points better than last year. Fiat still anchored the bottom of the list. However, its 161 problems this year is a lot better than the 206 in 2014. Ranked by nationality, Korean brands (Hyundai and Kia) are now leading the industry in initial quality with an average of 90 problems reported per 100 vehicles. According to J.D. Power, this is the first time Europe's figure beat Japan with 113 and 114 issues, respectively. The American brands also averaged 114. Whereas General Motors dominated last year, the segment awards are spread out in 2015. GM, Hyundai, Nissan, and Volkswagen Group are all tied with four models each earning prizes. For more information, you can also see all of the graphs, here. J.D.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.