Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 5-speed 4wd on 2040-cars

US $11,000.00
Year:2004 Mileage:118828
Location:

Bedford, Ohio, United States

Bedford, Ohio, United States

Auto Services in Ohio

Zink`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 33609 Till Rd, Bremen
Phone: (740) 385-7448

XTOWN PERFORMANCE ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Lifts-Automotive & Truck
Address: 1790 West Park Square, Wilberforce
Phone: (937) 372-1324

Wooster Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 3255 E Lincoln Way, Mount-Hope
Phone: (330) 263-1110

Walker Toyota Scion Mitsubishi Powersports ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Motorcycle Dealers
Address: 8457 Springboro Pike, Springboro
Phone: (937) 433-4950

V&S Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 712 Wales Rd NE, Beach-City
Phone: (330) 837-9180

True Quality Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6192 Webster ST, Yellow-Springs
Phone: (937) 264-1234

Auto blog

Jeepster name may be used for Fiat-based baby Jeep

Tue, 17 Dec 2013

In 1948, Willys-Overland, the forbearers of Jeep, built a vehicle called the Jeepster. It was a funky little thing, designed as a mix of the more rugged Jeeps that came before with what was then a modern car, which arguably makes it the world's first crossover. The name was later revived from 1966 to 1972, which means for Jeep enthusiasts, it has some history.
Now, the modern Jeep brand may revive the Jeepster name for a new product, likely based on Fiat bones, that will slot in at the bottom of the brand's range underneath the soon-to-depart Compass and Patriot. The report comes from Australia's Drive, which cites a dealer source that has seen the vehicle.
That same dealer confirmed there is a link between the Jeepster and the rumored Fiat 500X, and that the former will be available in both front and all-wheel-drive variants. The source also claims both gas and diesel engines will be available, although as this is an Aussie site, we shouldn't take that to mean we'll get a diesel Jeepster in the US.

Chinese Jeep production confirmed with Fiat, Guangzhou agreement

Wed, 21 Aug 2013

Fiat has just finalized a deal originally set up in January between it and China's Guangzhou Automotive Group to bring Jeep production to China. It remains unclear which models will be built, although we're wagering that it'll be the 2014 Cherokee. What we do know, now, is where production will take place.
According to Automotive News, Guangzhou originally wanted production to take place in its home assembly plant in its namesake city. Fiat has battled to send production to a joint venture facility established between Guangzhou and Fiat in the town of Changsha. The joint facility won out, and now the factory, originally built in 2010 with a 140,000-unit capacity, will see Jeeps rolling out of it.
Currently, the GAC-Fiat factory produces the Fiat Viaggio, a jointly developed product that is closely related to America's Dodge Dart. And while it remains unclear as to which model will join the Viaggio on the assembly line, that model is understood to ride on Fiat's Compact platform. The only Jeep to share those underpinnings is the new Cherokee, so there's not much connecting of dots needed to see why this scenario would make sense.

25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel

Mon, 10 Mar 2014

Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.