2006 Jeep Liberty Renegade Sport Utility 4-door 3.7l on 2040-cars
Pocatello, Idaho, United States
Jeep Liberty with low miles in excellent condition. AutoCheck report
available until I bought it in 2011 and full maintenance records since
then. New timing belt, front brakes, and is up to date on all required
maintenance. All terrain tires in Dec. of 2012. New battery in 2013.
Full sized spare mounted on back rack. New windshield one month ago.
Exterior has very minor scratches with exception of tire rims. Windows
are tinted on back and back passenger sides. Roof rack.Interior is very
clean. No rips or tears. Carpet and four floor mats in great
condition. Upholstery is stained and there is some marring of interior
vinyl and plastic from camping equipment and bikes, especially in the
cargo area. Rear cargo tie-downs and an adapter plug in cargo area.
Everything works. Cruise controls on steering wheel, which tilts.
Driver's seat is power. Four power windows with front two having
automatic down. Power mirrors and door locks. Much loved and taken
care of.
|
Jeep Liberty for Sale
- 2003 jeep liberty limited sport utility 4-door 3.7l
- 2004 jeep liberty sport loaded sunroof 4x4 low reserve bin contact abe
- Jeep liberty, black, 4wd, 4 door, sunroof, automatic transmission, 67,000 miles(US $10,000.00)
- 2005 jeep liberty sport 4wd automatic low miles very nice(US $8,000.00)
- Recent trade-in • sunroof!(US $7,899.00)
- 2012 jeep liberty limited jet edition(US $25,995.00)
Auto Services in Idaho
Wally`s Auto Care & Tire Fctry ★★★★★
Trans Pro Indl Transmissions ★★★★★
Stear Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Stallings Automotive Inc. ★★★★★
Sport Truck Center ★★★★★
Southern Idaho Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler recalls 350k vehicles over ignition switches
Thu, 25 Sep 2014Chrysler has announced a recall covering 349,442 vehicles due to ignition switches that can either become stuck or move without warning. All of the affected vehicles are from the 2008 model year, and were built before May 12, 2008.
The automaker has learned that ignition keys on some vehicles "may not fully return to the 'ON' position after rotation to the 'START' position during engine-startup," the company said in a statement. Additionally, "an ignition key may not fully return to the 'ON' position after rotation to the 'START' position and may inadvertently move through the 'ON' position to 'ACCESSORY' or 'OFF.'"
Chrysler says it is unaware of any related injuries, and notes that while reduced braking, engine or steering power is possible in such instances, the airbags are not affected. The later stands in contrast to General Motors' recent rash of high-profile recalls, and it's an important distinction that Chrysler (understandably) felt necessary to call out in bold print in its press release.
NHTSA boss Strickland weighs in on Jeep recall fracas
Sat, 15 Jun 2013Adding yet another chapter to the ongoing Jeep recall story, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) head David Strickland has gone on record to defend the government's request that Chrysler recall 2.7 million out-of-production Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Liberty vehicles after the agency investigated fiery rear-end collisions that have reportedly killed at least 51 people over the years. In statements made to The Detroit News, Strickland said, "We felt very strongly that the process that we undertook and the findings that we made and ... we made the decision to issue a recall request. We do not take that very lightly." The top US auto safety regulator stopped short of telling owners to park their cars until the automaker takes action. "They can make their own risk assessment and their own choices," he said.
Chrysler does not intend to recall the models, insisting the "vehicles met and exceeded all applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, including FMVSS 301, pertaining to fuel-system integrity" when they were manufactured and sold. "The company does not agree with NHTSA's conclusions and does not intend to recall the vehicles cited in the investigation. The subject vehicles are safe and are not defective," Chrysler announced last week in a statement. "We believe NHTSA's initial conclusions are based on an incomplete analysis of the underlying data, and we are committed to continue working with the agency to resolve this disagreement."
Legally, Chrysler has until June 18 to formally respond to NHTSA's request. If the automaker does not take action, NHTSA is expected to issue a formal finding and seek a recall.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.