2002 - Jeep Grand Cherokee on 2040-cars
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, United States
YOU ARE LOOKING AT A VERY WELL KEPT 2 OWNER AWD LIMITED WITH VERY LOW MILES POWERED BY THE OPTIONAL HIGH OUTPUT 4.7 LITRE V8 AND HAS THE QUADRA DRIVE. THIS LIMITED WAS USED SPARINGLY AS A SECOND VEHILCE BY THE ORIGINAL OWNER, AND I HAVE ONLY PUT ON ABOUT 2000 MILES ON IT IN OVER 2 YEARS AS NJ TITLE WILL SHOW.THERE HAS BEEN NO BODY WORK OR REPAINT DONE .THE LIMITED COMES WITH ALL OPTIONS INCLUDING THE FACTORY REAL CHROME WHEELS THAT WERE TAKEN OFF WINTERS AS YOU CAN SEE THERE IS NO CURB RASH, DINGS OR SCRATCHES.THE ORIGINAL SNOW WHITE PAINT HAS NO CLEARCOAT ISSUES AND A GREAT SHINE FOR BEING WHITE. THERE ARE VERY VERY FEW DINGS AND NO DENTS. THE CHROME IN THE GRILLE AREA STILL LOOKS LIKE NEW.AS YOU CAN SEE THE REAR BUMPER COVER HAS NOT EVEN BEEN SCRATCHED OR ABUSED BY LOADING OR UNLOADING.
Jeep Grand Cherokee for Sale
- 1998 - jeep grand cherokee(US $1,000.00)
- 2008 - jeep grand cherokee(US $7,000.00)
- 2001 - jeep grand cherokee(US $7,000.00)
- 2011 - jeep grand cherokee(US $9,000.00)
- 2008 - jeep grand cherokee(US $17,000.00)
- 2011 - jeep grand cherokee(US $10,000.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Wrek Room ★★★★★
Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★
Warren Auto Service ★★★★★
Ultimate Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★
Ulrich Sales & Service ★★★★★
Tower Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps
Tue, 18 Jun 2013Chrysler made big news earlier in the month by refusing a recall request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for the 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002-2007 Jeep Liberty. Last week, NHTSA boss David Strickland countered by defending his agency's request for the recall of 2.7 million Jeep SUVs. Today marked the deadline for Chrysler to formally respond to NHTSA, and it seems that both parties have met in the middle with Chrysler inspecting and upgrading some of the affected vehicles without using the word "recall," which would constitute the admission of a defect; instead, Chrysler said that it is conducting a "voluntary campaign."
At issue on these vehicles is the positioning of the fuel tank behind the rear axle that could get damaged during a rear-end collision. NHTSA has stated that at least 51 people have been killed in rear-end collisions involving these Jeeps after the vehicles caught fire, to which Chrysler countered by pointing out that both models "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity.
As a compromise on the situation, Chrysler says that it will inspect all pre-2004 Grand Cherokees and pre-2007 Liberty models and, "if necessary, provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle." According to Automotive News, this upgrade will consist of adding a trailer hitch that will presumably better protect the rear-mounted gas tank. Vehicles already equipped with a factory or Mopar hitch will not be modified. Chrysler's official statement on the matter is posted below, but no additional information has been released, such as when the campaign will begin and how many vehicles could be affected.
FCA's shifter fiasco proves novel gear selectors are a bad idea
Tue, Feb 9 2016What's wrong with PRNDL? Why are automakers trying to overly complicate the simple task of selecting gears? If there's any lesson to learn from the recent news that NHTSA is investigating 853,000 Fiat Chrysler vehicles over its problematic gear selectors, it's that the trend of fancy shifters needs to stop. Now. Last year, NHTSA opened an investigation into Jeep Grand Cherokee models, and has now expanded this probe to include the 2012-14 Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger. The problem? The shifter – assembled by ZF – is confusing for many drivers. "Testing ... indicates that operation of the (electronic) shifter is not intuitive and provides poor tactile and visual feedback to the driver, increasing the potential for unintended gear selection," a NHTSA document states. More than 100 crashes and over a dozen injuries are linked to this problem, according to The Detroit Free Press. To us, the problem isn't just limited to FCA. These unnecessarily novel gear selectors are spreading like wildfire across the industry. Honda and Acura use a weird pushbutton setup. Lincolns have buttons on the dashboard. Jaguar's shifter electronically raises out of the center console. Mercedes uses a stalk with up-for-Reverse, down-for-Drive, push-for-Neutral arrangement. And what the hell is BMW thinking with its M cars? FCA has since abandoned the confusing shifters in question. The 300, Charger, and Grand Cherokee now use the rotary shift dial that's quickly proliferating across the company's brands. Simplistic gear selectors might not be sexy, but no one ever complained about not being able to find the right gear in a Hyundai Sonata. What's most interesting is that this NHTSA investigation could push FCA – and possibly other automakers – to redesign vehicle functions that otherwise operate as designed. Just because most people will never have a problem putting a Dodge Charger in Reverse doesn't mean there isn't a flaw with the design. But perhaps a more simplistic solution – good ol' PRNDL – would have prevented these issues from the start. Related Video: News Source: The Detroit Free PressImage Credit: Copyright 2016 AOL Government/Legal Chrysler Dodge Jeep FCA shifters
Chrysler, Nissan looking into claim that their cars are industry's most hackable
Sun, 10 Aug 2014A pair of cyber security experts have awarded the ignominious title of most hackable vehicles on American roads to the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, 2014 Infiniti Q50 and 2015 Cadillac Escalade.
Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek are set to release a report at the Black Hat hacking conference in Las Vegas, Automotive News reports. The two men found the Jeep, Caddy and Q50 were easiest to hack based not on actual tests with the vehicles, but a detailed analysis of systems like Bluetooth and wireless internet access - basically, anything that'd allow a hacker to remotely gain access to the vehicle's systems.
Considering this lack of hands-on testing, the pair acknowledge that "most hackable" could be a relative term - they point out that the vehicles may actually be quite secure.