2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee *** No Reserve No Reserve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! on 2040-cars
Johnston, Rhode Island, United States
Body Type:Sport Utility
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.0L 242Cu. In. l6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Jeep
Model: Grand Cherokee
Warranty: Unspecified
Trim: Laredo Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 198,771
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6
2001 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE THIS HAS THE STRAIGHT 6 IN IT, THESE MOTORS RUN FOR EVER. 4X4 ,PWR WINDOWS, PWR LOCKS ,ICE COLD A/C, HEAT WORKS ALSO. JUST RECEIVED FRESH TUNE UP, NEW MUFFLER AND PASSED RHODE ISLAND SAFETY AND EMISSIONS TESTING. TRUCK HAS GOOD BRAKES AND TIRES, SUSPENSION SEEMS IN GOOD CONDITION. MOTOR RUNS STRONG TRANS SHIFTS EXCELLENT .TRUCK RUNS AND DRIVES 100 PERCENT . COMES WITH 3MONTH 3000 MILE WARRANTY. SMALL RUST SPOT ON PASSENGER SIDE REAR FENDER WHEEL. TRUCK WAS JUST DETAILED . THIS JEEP IS READY TO DRIVE WHERE IT NEEDS TO GO. WAS TRADED IN ON A BRAND NEW JEEP WELL MAINTAINED ITS LIFE. THERE IS A 100 DOC FEE DUE AT SALE. TEMPORARY PLATES ARE AVAIALBLE FOR 50 DOLLARS. HAPPY BIDDING THIS IS A NO RESERVE AUCTION.
Jeep Grand Cherokee for Sale
2012 jeep grand cherokee limited sport utility 4-door 5.7l(US $41,000.00)
1998 jeep grand cherokee laredo
1994 jeep grand cherokee limited sport utility 4-door 5.2l(US $3,200.00)
Garage kept 5.7l hemi w/trailer tow group iv(US $15,000.00)
2012 grand cherokee spring special group loaded!
1998 jeep grand cherokee
Auto Services in Rhode Island
Seaport Auto ★★★★★
Roy`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Rochefort Auto Svc ★★★★★
Ray`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Flynn Automotive and Tire ★★★★★
Felix Auto Collision Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jeep Wrangler's shift to aluminum could see production leave Toledo
Mon, 06 Oct 2014The Jeep Wrangler may be a timeless design, but sooner or later, time will run out and Chrysler will have to replace it with a newer model more friendly towards the earth it's designed to traverse. That will, it seems, mean a shift to aluminum construction (whether just for the body or for the entire structure) - but what will that mean for the Wrangler's long-time home of Toledo, OH?
According to the latest pronouncements from Fiat Chrysler chief Sergio Marchionne, the shift to an aluminum Wrangler would likely mean moving production out of Toledo. "If the solution is aluminum," Marchionne told Automotive News, "then I think unfortunately Toledo is the wrong place, the wrong setup to try and build a Wrangler, because it requires a complete reconfiguring of the assets that would be cost-prohibitive."
Marchionne also indicated that, were Wrangler production to move elsewhere, it would find another line to take its place in Ohio. "One of the thing that we are dealing with now is what else we do with Toledo that fulfills our commitment to the city and to Ohio. I don't have a doubt that there will be zero impact on head count and employment levels and anything else." Jeep has built the Wrangler in Toledo since World War II, with the exception of six years starting in 1986 when it was built in Brampton, Ontario. The complex dates back to 1910 and currently produces the Wrangler and Cherokee. Past products have included the Wagoneer and Commanche as well as the Dodge Dakota and Nitro.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Chrysler defies NHTSA, says it won't recall 2.7M Jeep Grand Cherokee, Liberty models
Wed, 05 Jun 2013Facing a possible recall totaling around 2.7 million of its most popular SUVs, Chrysler remains insistent that the 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002-2007 Jeep Liberty are safe vehicles. This comes on the heels of a recall request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for these two models due to fuel tanks mounted behind the rear axle, which could possibly be ruptured during severe rear-end collisions, leading to an increased risk of fire. In response to the allegations, Chrysler says that it does not agree with NHTSA nor does it plan on recalling either vehicle.
Chrysler said both SUVs "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity, and cooperated fully with NHTSA since the investigation was opened in 2010. While 15 deaths and 46 injuries have been reported from fires caused by rear-end collisions on these models, Chrysler is claiming that the vast majority of incidents cited by NHTSA were "high-energy crashes," including one where a stopped Grand Cherokee was rear-ended by a tractor trailer going 65 miles per hour.
The automaker wraps up by saying "NHTSA seems to be holding Chrysler Group to a new standard for fuel tank integrity that does not exist now and did not exist when the Jeep vehicles were manufactured." Scroll down for Chrysler's official response to NHTSA, but we're pretty sure this isn't the last we've heard on this issue.