2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee on 2040-cars
Whitefield, New Hampshire, United States
Body Type:Wagon
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Jeep
Model: Grand Cherokee
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: 4 DOOR
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Mileage: 156,161
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 8
Jeep Grand Cherokee for Sale
2014 jeep grand cherokee hemi - ltd - brilliant black -(US $43,860.00)
Jeep grand cherokee limited v8 4x4 leather low miles sharp(US $9,989.00)
3.0l crd diesel 4wd automatic gps navi back up camera tv/dvd leather
2010 srt-8 20" wheels sunroof leather suede seats(US $42,890.00)
2011 jeep grand cherokee laredo sport utility 4-door 3.6l
2013 srt8 used 6.4l v8 16v automatic suv premium(US $56,991.00)
Auto Services in New Hampshire
Union Used Auto Parts ★★★★★
Subaru of Keene ★★★★★
Sousa`s Auto Service & Sale ★★★★★
Nashua Wholesale Tire ★★★★★
King Street Auto Body ★★★★★
Dix Auto Body ★★★★★
Auto blog
Favorite vehicles of 2017
Fri, Dec 22 2017The Autoblog staff has driven a lot of vehicles in 2017. This video showcases our favorite vehicles from this year, along with some thoughts on why they made the list. Wanna read more head over to https://www.autoblog.com/photos/best-drivers-cars-2017/ Aston Martin Audi Ford Jeep Lexus Porsche Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video porsche macan lexus lc 500 macan wrangler r8 Arts and Entertainment
2019 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Spied | Autoblog Minute
Wed, Oct 19 2016Photo leak gives us our first glimpse at the 2019 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Jeep SUV Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video 5g Connectivity supercar transportation rendering mobility
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.



