Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4x4 on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:153220
Location:

Sandusky, Ohio, United States

Sandusky, Ohio, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.7L 287Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1J4GW68N6XC658862 Year: 1999
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Make: Jeep
Model: Grand Cherokee
Options: Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: 4 WHEEL DRIVE
Mileage: 153,220
Number of Cylinders: 8
Disability Equipped: No
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

The following items were replaced at 145,836 miles: Both upper ball joints, both hub bearings, left and right front drive shafts, right outer tie rod, left outer tie rod, adjusting sleeve, both lower ball joints, steering stabilizer, diff-cover, 75W140 Synpower Gear Oil, front brake pads, rear brake pads, right rear caliper, left rear caliper, rear brake rotors, front brake rotors, left front caliper, right front caliper, hood lift, crank sensor, can sensor, taillight assembly, taillight socket. The following items were replaced at 150,000 miles; Spark Plugs, thermostat, water pump, A/C Accumulator w/ hose assembly, all heater door actuator door motors, A/C liquid line w/orifice tube, heater core, blower motor, blower motor resistor, and A/C evaporator core, all 4 shocks.

This vehicle is offered for sale locally and listing can be cancelled at any time due to a sale locally

Auto Services in Ohio

Weber Road Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 E Weber Rd, Grove-City
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Twinsburg Brake & Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 2266 E Aurora Rd, Chagrin-Falls
Phone: (330) 405-5156

Trost`s Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 4 S Main St, Bradford
Phone: (937) 676-5751

TransColonial Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 8228 Washington St, Pepper-Pike
Phone: (440) 543-3355

Top Tech Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3850 E 5th Ave, Pataskala
Phone: (614) 238-3603

Tire Discounters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 2039 E Dublin Granville Rd, New-Albany
Phone: (614) 888-7200

Auto blog

100,000 Jeep Cherokee models subject to further 9-speed recalibration

Thu, 29 May 2014

It seems that the software problems with the nine-speed automatic gearbox in the Jeep Cherokee continue to mount. The programming already caused multiple development delays and even postponed the Cherokee's market launch by roughly two months. Now, Jeep has issued another recalibration to hopefully assuage unhappy drivers.
According to Automotive News, this reflash for the allegedly jerky transmission covers over 100,000 Cherokees built before May 5, but it's not technically a recall. If owners are having problems and complain to the dealer, they get the new software. Otherwise, they continue with the current version. New vehicles on dealer lots also receive the latest revision to the programming. It takes only around five minutes to install, but technicians need to take the Cherokee on a test drive to adapt the gearbox to the changes.
The Cherokee's transmission software has been problematic practically since the beginning. The Jeep plant in Toledo, OH, briefly idled its second-shift workers last year to take care of the issue. Since the launch issues for the crossover, demand has been strong. Jeep added another 1,000 temporary workers to the Toledo factory to keep up, and sales were on par with the Wrangler in just its first two months.

GMC wants to target Jeep with compact crossover

Mon, Dec 14 2015

GMC execs might consider adding a Jeep competitor to the range, but rather than new rumors of a Wrangler-fighter, this time the Professional Grade brand could go after the Renegade. Division boss Duncan Aldred would like to broaden the brand's lineup with a subcompact crossover. "I keep telling everyone, 'How can General Motors' truck brand not be in the fastest-growing segment in the industry, an SUV segment," he said to Automotive News but wouldn't confirm whether the model was under development. General Motors already offers small crossovers like the Chevrolet Trax and Buick Encore, but the CUV segment in general continues to drive auto sales in the US. Adding a similarly sized GMC to the mix might increase the automaker's volume by appealing to different customers. "A GMC buyer is very different from a Buick buyer. This is like comparing the Fiat 500X to the Jeep Renegade. They are very similar but appeal to different people," Dave Sullivan, Product Analysis Manager at AutoPacific, told Autoblog. Aldred started the speculation about a Wrangler-fighting model in an interview in late 2014, and the company reportedly even raised the idea of an offroad-focused vehicle to dealers to see how they reacted. The development process was only in the very early planning stages, but the brand considered using Hummer for a little of the new product's inspiration. Aldred later suggested to journalists the possibility of adding a compact or midsize SUV to the GMC range in the next 10 years to appeal to more buyers. He didn't comment directly on the possibility of the Wrangler-challenger at the time beyond saying: "I can't confirm that ... everything's on the table." Related Video:

Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time

Mon, Jul 20 2015

The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.