1999 Jeep Cherokee Classic Sport Utility 4-door 4.0l Low Miles on 2040-cars
Cotuit, Massachusetts, United States
|
This is a beast of truck that's enjoyed life on the outer beach and tooling around Cape Cod. She's always been a slow starter, though it's never been a problem. Several mechanics have looked into it, but that's just the way she is. I'd love to keep her but need something with third row seating. That being said, she does have a few issues:
Hairline crack in the middle of the windshield--I do a lot of highway driving and it got dinged by a pebble. The airbag light is on--this is due to a faulty computer chip that can be replaced via open recall. The car was in an accident with the original owner, (reconstructed title) and because of where it was hit, the backseat latch does not lock into place on the driver's side, though this does not affect the use of the backseat when it's up. The lining on the interior roof is hurtin' (i.e., I've been using pins to keep it up, which I'd leave in the vehicle if you'd like--my pin collection is pretty awesome). It initially started as a little rip that a certain child decided to stick their finger into and see what would happen when they pulled. And, last but not least, my son put coins in the CD player, and the radio ceased working. Selling as is--apologies for not getting these things fixed before selling but I simply don't have the time right now. |
Jeep Cherokee for Sale
1999 jeep cherokee no reserve
White jeep cherokee 4x4
1987 jeep cherokee pioneer sport utility 4-door 4.0l
1996 jeep cherokee 2dr ex government forest service !(US $5,500.00)
Rare manual 5 speed 4x4 1999 classic sport utility 4-door 4.0l(US $8,500.00)
1999 jeep cherokee lifted sport utility 4-door 4.0l(US $4,000.00)
Auto Services in Massachusetts
Worldwide Preowned ★★★★★
Vanderveer Motors ★★★★★
Swanson Buick-GMC Truck ★★★★★
Superior Systems ★★★★★
Sully`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Standard Auto Wrecking ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Jeep Cherokee
Thu, 19 Sep 2013The Cherokee Is Dead. Long Live The Cherokee.
There are three sentences that, for this reviewer, define what needs to be conveyed about the 2014 Jeep Cherokee. The first: it is very good.
Jeep spent 27 years building the Cherokee and its brand, from 1974 to 2001. Twelve years ago, the Cherokee nameplate rolled away into the distant hills and retirement, at least here in the NAFTA colonies, and it was replaced by a loaded word we knew as "Liberty."
Consumer Reports digs Mazda3, disses Jeep Cherokee
Tue, 11 Feb 2014Consumer Reports has just rendered its verdict on two of the more important cars to launch this year - the Mazda3 and the Jeep Cherokee. Considering the value a "Recommended" rating carries with the public and the viciously competitive markets these two cars compete in, Consumer Reports' view could have some impact on their initial success.
For Mazda, that's a good thing. CR spoke quite highly of the Zoom-Zoom brand's compact sedan and hatch, testing both models, and citing the excellent fuel economy and snickety-snack manual shifter as high points. Downsides to the 3 included a ride that is agile but "nervous," a bit too much noise and a cramped back seat. Still, the 3 was good enough to earn its place in the ranks of the "Recommended."
The Jeep didn't fare quite so well, with CR calling the polarizing CUV "half-baked." Although both engines were tested, the magazine called the 2.4-liter four-pot underpowered and its nine-speed automatic unrefined and unresponsive. That's particularly damning, considering the 9AT's role in future Chrysler products, including the extremely important 200. Overall, the Cherokee missed out on the coveted "Recommended" rating.
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.