2012 Hyundai Sonata Gls on 2040-cars
8485 Rivers Ave, North Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Engine:2.4L I4 16V GDI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5NPEB4AC7CH346005
Stock Num: 140482A
Make: Hyundai
Model: Sonata GLS
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Midnight Black Mica
Interior Color: Beige
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 46643
Hyundai Certified, Excellent Condition. WAS $16,995, PRICED TO MOVE $400 below NADA Retail!, EPA 35 MPG Hwy/24 MPG City! iPod/MP3 Input, Satellite Radio, Onboard Communications System, CD Player, Overhead Airbag, MUD GUARD AND MORE!======BUY WITH CONFIDENCE: 150-Point Inspection and Reconditioning, 24-Hour Roadside Assistance, 10-Year/ 100, 000 mile powertrain limited warrantty, Towing/Rental/Travel Breakdown Benefits, Carfax Vehicle History Report, 10-Year/Unlimited mileage roadside assistance & 1st-Day Rental Car reimbursement for covered repairs ======AFFORDABILITY: Reduced from $16, 995. This Sonata is priced $400 below NADA Retail. ======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: Satellite Radio, iPod/MP3 Input, CD Player, Onboard Communications System MP3 Player, Remote Trunk Release, Keyless Entry, Child Safety Locks, Steering Wheel Controls. ======OPTION PACKAGES: CARPETED FLOOR MATS, MUD GUARD, MIDNIGHT BLACK, GRAY, CLOTH SEATS. GLS with Midnight Black exterior and Gray interior features a 4 Cylinder Engine with 198 HP at 6300 RPM*. Serviced here, Non-Smoker vehicle, Originally bought here, Fully Inspected. ======EXPERTS REPORT: Edmunds.com explains Fresh off a full redesign last year, the 2012 Hyundai Sonata remains the car to beat in its class.. Great Gas Mileage: 35 MPG Hwy. ======BUY FROM AN AWARD WINNING DEALER: Hendrick Hyundai North! Our team is professional, offers you a no-pressure environment and operates with the quality you expect. Closing Fee is included in the advertised/sales price. Pricing analysis performed on 6/17/2014. Horsepower calculations based on trim engine configuration. Fuel economy calculations based on original manufacturer data for trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase. WE HAVE ACCESS TO THOUSANDS OF USED CARS THROUGH OUR SISTER STORES ALL OVER THE SOUTH EAST! GET MORE USED CAR FOR YOUR HARD-EARNED DOLLAR FROM HENDRICK HYUNDAI'S INTERNET SALES TEAM!
Hyundai Sonata for Sale
- 2013 hyundai sonata gls(US $16,995.00)
- 2013 hyundai sonata gls(US $18,995.00)
- 2013 hyundai sonata limited 2.0t(US $22,795.00)
- 2014 hyundai sonata limited 2.0t(US $25,200.00)
- 2014 hyundai sonata limited(US $26,590.00)
- 2013 hyundai sonata gls(US $16,995.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wingard Towing Service ★★★★★
Wilkins Motor Company ★★★★★
USA Tire & Auto Care ★★★★★
Sumter County Customs ★★★★★
Stroman Welding & Auto Repair ★★★★★
Spearman Brothers Collision Repair & Refinishing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study
Hyundai to build test facility at N"urburgring
Sun, 20 Jan 2013It looks as if Hyundai is set to build a test facility at the famous Nürburgring. Carscoop reports the Korean automaker has commenced construction on a 10,000-square-foot test center with access to the lengthy German track. Hyundai says the $7.3 million facility will help the company focus on improving the ride and handling of its vehicles through extensive research and development.
Sounds like a plan to us. While we've seen Hyundai vehicles improve on many fronts over the past few years, the company continues to struggle with suspension refinement compared to its Japanese, German and domestic rivals.
Automakers routinely flock to the Nürburgring for testing and development thanks to the track's unusual attributes. With a variety of surfaces, banking, turns, elevation and even weather, the circuit offers engineers the ability to put a vehicle through its paces in a wider range of conditions than most facilities.
EPA says it will more closely monitor fuel economy claims from automakers
Fri, 15 Feb 2013The unintended acceleration brouhaha at Toyota led to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration tightening the vise on recall procedures. Likewise, the fuel economy kerfuffle that blew up with Hyundai and Kia's admission of overstated fuel mileage claims could lead to the Environmental Protection Agency policing automaker assertions by performing more audits.
At least, that's what a senior engineer with the government agency said while in Michigan giving a talk, according to a report in Automotive News. What that actually means, however, is still in question. Just ten to 15 percent of new vehicles - something like 150 to 200 cars per year - are rested by the EPA to verify automaker numbers. The EPA's own tests include a "fudge factor" to adjust lab mileage for real-world mileage, and the agency still relies on automakers to submit data for tests that it doesn't have the facilities to perform. How much more auditing can the EPA really expect to do, or perhaps a more relevant question would be how much more accurate could the EPA's audits become?
The price of gasoline, the psychological importance of 40 miles per gallon to a frugal car buyer, an automaker wanting to further justify the price premium of a hybrid, all of these things contribute to fuel economy numbers that insist on creeping upward. Perhaps the senior engineer encapsulated the whole situation best when he said, "Everybody wants a label that tells you exactly what you're going to get, but obviously that's not possible. A good general rule of thumb is that real-world fuel economy is about 20 percent lower than the lab numbers." If the lesson isn't exactly 'buyer beware,' it's at least 'buyer be wary.'