Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Hyundai Se on 2040-cars

Year:2008 Mileage:82631 Color: Tan /
 Other
Location:

Centereach, New York, United States

Centereach, New York, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
Engine:6
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 5NPEU46F98H335818
Year: 2008
Make: Hyundai
Model: Sonata
Mileage: 82,631
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: SE
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Tan
Cab Type: Other
Interior Color: Other
Drivetrain: Front Wheel Drive

Auto Services in New York

Zona Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 259 Lee Rd, West-Henrietta
Phone: (585) 458-8759

Zima Tire Supply ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 213 Montauk Hwy, Bellport
Phone: (631) 325-0740

Worlds Best Auto, Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Financial Services, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1020 Utica Ave, Staten-Island
Phone: (718) 928-7741

Vip Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 765 US Highway 22, Staten-Island
Phone: (908) 226-9090

VIP Auto Group ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Tire Dealers
Address: 1664 Hylan Blvd, Huguenot
Phone: (718) 477-7888

Village Line Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 67A Albany Ave, Wading-River
Phone: (631) 842-7777

Auto blog

2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo: Introduction

Mon, 28 Jan 2013

The Hyundai Veloster is indeed an automotive oddball, and that's part of the reason why we're so drawn to it. Even in base form, the Veloster is a cleverly packaged little wonder that's bursting with personality, and with the added grunt and visual aggression of the Turbo model, there's a lot to talk about.
Despite not really fitting into any one specific vehicle segment (unless you dump it into the all-too-vague "compact" class), the Veloster Turbo looks really good on paper, to say nothing of how it looks on the street. It's certainly a head-turner, and we're intrigued by the overall package of an oddly shaped three-door (or four-door?) with some forced induction motivation.
We've had a lot to say about the weird little Hyundai in the past, and we don't see the conversations about this car ending anytime soon. Thus, we've welcomed a matte gray example into the Autoblog long-term garage for one year of testing. This should definitely be interesting.

Hyundai will open up some hydrogen fuel cell patents in Korea

Tue, Feb 10 2015

Last year, Tesla made its electric vehicle patents open source. Last month, Toyota did the same with some of its hydrogen fuel cell patents. Now, Hyundai is going to let some Korean companies get access to the automaker's patents as parts of a innovation center project in Gwangju, South Korea. Just Auto reports that about 1,000 "unused patents" belonging to Kia and Hyundai will be made available to participants in a new automotive start-up hub. There will be 12 of these hubs in Korea, not all focused on hydrogen fuel cells. Hyundai said that it will help raise $164 million to help turn Gwangju in a center for eco-friendly industry. Phil Floraday, Hyundai Motor America manager of Midwest Product Public Relations, told AutoblogGreen that, "The main purpose of the patents mentioned in the story will be to nurture small- and medium-sized businesses in the Gwangju area. While we cannot clarify all the patents at this time, we can tell you that they are not entirely focused on FCEV or eco-friendly patents only." Featured Gallery 2015 Hyundai Tucson Fuel Cell View 29 Photos News Source: Just Auto Government/Legal Green Hyundai Hydrogen Cars patent

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.