Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Hyundai Santa Fe Gls W/3.5l (a5) on 2040-cars

Year:2004 Mileage:116 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:4
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: KM8SC73E54U618263 Year: 2004
Exterior Color: Red
Make: Hyundai
Interior Color: Gray
Model: Santa Fe
Mileage: 116
Warranty: Unspecified
Sub Model: GLS w/3.5L
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in New Jersey

Vitos Auto Electric ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1374 Stuyvesant Ave, Elizabeth
Phone: (908) 688-3818

Town Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 107 Grove St, Essex-Fells
Phone: (973) 744-0808

Tony`s Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 711 W Oregon Ave, Audubon
Phone: (215) 389-6129

Stan`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 714 Old Shore Rd, Barnegat-Lgt
Phone: (609) 242-7826

Sam`s Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Automobile Detailing
Address: 132 E Route 59, Pompton-Lakes
Phone: (845) 623-3800

Rdn Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 344 S Main St, Long-Beach-Township
Phone: (609) 698-2100

Auto blog

Hyundai ranks highest in Total Value Awards with Equus leading all cars

Sat, 16 Nov 2013

Hyundai has taken the cake in Strategic Vision's 18th Total Value Index. The study, which looked at 45,952 new car buyers for 2013 models between September 2012 and March 2013, looks at the ownership experience along with the customer's views on the economic impact of the purchase in both the near and long term.
For the first time, Hyundai was ranked as the leading brand for Total Value, while its Equus luxury sedan scored both the highest overall score and took the crown in the luxury segment. Other Hyundai winners included the Sonata (tied with Fusion), Genesis Coupe and Elantra.
Ford scored quite well, too, taking the segment titles with the Fiesta Sedan (which tied with Elantra), Fusion, Focus Hatchback, Taurus (tied with Dodge Charger), Explorer and Lincoln Navigator. General Motors' cars and trucks managed to capture eight segments, while Toyota topped six areas.

Hyundai i20 shows what brown can do for you [w/video]

Thu, 02 Oct 2014

With the latest generation of the i20 at the 2014 Paris Motor Show, Hyundai continues to shake off its old image in Europe as a maker of cheap, unstylish little penalty boxes. This five-door hatch has to fit into the crowded, compact hatch market over there against popular entries like the Ford Fiesta and Volkswagen Polo - a high bar for success. But the Korean automaker claims that its latest vehicle is up to the task because it's designed in Europe specifically with European buyers in mind.
The new i20 takes a small step a bit more upmarket with features like LED front and rear lighting and a rearview camera. However, the biggest change is the jump in interior room, though. The wheelbase is two-inches longer than before, and the growth gives the hatch best-in-class legroom and cargo capacity with the rear seats up, according to Hyundai. Rounding out the improvements is an available panoramic sunroof that the company also believes is unique for the segment.
For the Paris show, Hyundai made the i20 extra sweet by covering it in a chocolaty shade of brown to look like a little French confection on the show floor. Scroll down for all of the details about it, and for the impossibly epic launch video.

What do J.D. Power's quality ratings really measure?

Wed, Jun 24 2015

Check these recently released J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) results. Do they raise any questions in your mind? Premium sports-car maker Porsche sits in first place for the third straight year, so are Porsches really the best-built cars in the U.S. market? Korean brands Kia and Hyundai are second and fourth, so are Korean vehicles suddenly better than their US, European, and Japanese competitors? Are workaday Chevrolets (seventh place) better than premium Buicks (11th), and Buicks better than luxury Cadillacs (21st), even though all are assembled in General Motors plants with the same processes and many shared parts? Are Japanese Acuras (26th) worse than German Volkswagens (24th)? And is "quality" really what it used to be (and what most perceive it to be), a measure of build excellence? Or has it evolved into much more a measure of likeability and ease of use? To properly analyze these widely watched results, we must first understand what IQS actually studies, and what the numerical scores really mean. First, as its name indicates, it's all about "initial" quality, measured by problems reported by new-vehicle owners in their first 90 days of ownership. If something breaks or falls off four months in, it doesn't count here. Second, the scores are problems per 100 vehicles, or PP100. So Power's 2015 IQS industry average of 112 PP100 translates to just 1.12 reported problems per vehicle. Third, no attempt is made to differentiate BIG problems from minor ones. Thus a transmission or engine failure counts the same as a squeaky glove box door, tricky phone pairing, inconsistent voice recognition, or anything else that annoys the owner. Traditionally, a high-quality vehicle is one that is well-bolted together. It doesn't leak, squeak, rattle, shed parts, show gaps between panels, or break down and leave you stranded. By this standard, there are very few poor-quality new vehicles in today's U.S. market. But what "quality" should not mean, is subjective likeability: ease of operation of the radio, climate controls, or seat adjusters, phone pairing, music downloading, sizes of touch pads on an infotainment screen, quickness of system response, or accuracy of voice-recognition. These are ergonomic "human factors" issues, not "quality" problems. Yet these kinds of pleasability issues are now dominating today's JDP "quality" ratings.