Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Hyundai Santa Fe Gls Sport Utility 5-door 2.7l on 2040-cars

US $1,700.00
Year:2001 Mileage:184675 Color: Gold /
 Gray
Location:

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.7L 2656CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
VIN: km8sc83d41u118801 Mileage: 184,675
Exterior Color: Gold
Interior Color: Gray
Year: 2001
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Hyundai
Model: Santa Fe
Trim: GLS Sport Utility 5-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a 4wd 2.7L V6 2001 Hyundai Santa Fe. It's in good conditions with the exception of the transmission that went neutral in any gear. After doing some research found that is the wave spring inside the transmission and affected the oil pump too. The transmission is not broken neither burned. The SUV will need a few minor details like the valve gasket, speed sensor because is not reflecting the actual millage, the gas cap it's stuck and will be an excellent opportunity to change the timing belt. When I bought this SUV for my wife, it had 184,000 on it, then the speedometer stop working with one month of use because of the speed sensor in the tranny. Since for 3 months we haven't used this car. I don't have the money to fix it. So is parked in the street paying the insurance and state taxes.
Asking $1,700 Firm.

Hyundai Santa Fe for Sale

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Woodlawn Autobody Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9 North St, Jamaica-Plain
Phone: (781) 963-6629

Tri-State Vinyl Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Automobile Accessories
Address: East-Longmeadow
Phone: (413) 782-0335

Tint King Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting
Address: 505 Middlesex Tpke Unit# 22, East-Boston
Phone: (978) 670-2927

Sturbridge Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: Auburn
Phone: (508) 347-7469

Strojny Glass Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: 92 Weir St, Mansfield
Phone: (508) 824-8671

Sonny Johnson Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 621 Pond St, South-Weymouth
Phone: (781) 849-3077

Auto blog

Porsche tops J.D. Power quality index as Korean brands soar

Thu, Jun 18 2015

While complaints about infotainment systems remain a thorn in the side of automakers for J.D. Power's annual Initial Quality Study, there's a lot to celebrate this year. The average number of problems reported per 100 vehicles fell to 112 in 2015 – a three-percent improvement compared to 116 in 2014. The results of this year's survey are based on the responses of over 84,000 people about problems within the first 90 days of buying or leasing a 2015 model-year vehicle. For the third consecutive year, Porsche tops the rankings with an average of 80 problems per 100 vehicles. Although, that's slightly more than the 74 the German sportscar maker scored in 2014. "While the Japanese automakers continue to make improvements, we're seeing other brands, most notably Korean makes, really accelerating the rate of improvement," Renee Stephens, vice president of US automotive quality at J.D. Power, said in the study's release. In fact, Kia ranks as one of the biggest movers in this year's list. The Korean brand jumped to second place from seventh last year. The company had an average of 86 problems per 100 vehicles, a 20-point improvement. Third place went to Jaguar with an average of 93 problems reported, versus last year's second-place finish with 87 of them. Fourth place was Hyundai, and fifth-place Infiniti also earned a gold star for improvement with 97 issues per 100 vehicles – 31-points better than last year. Fiat still anchored the bottom of the list. However, its 161 problems this year is a lot better than the 206 in 2014. Ranked by nationality, Korean brands (Hyundai and Kia) are now leading the industry in initial quality with an average of 90 problems reported per 100 vehicles. According to J.D. Power, this is the first time Europe's figure beat Japan with 113 and 114 issues, respectively. The American brands also averaged 114. Whereas General Motors dominated last year, the segment awards are spread out in 2015. GM, Hyundai, Nissan, and Volkswagen Group are all tied with four models each earning prizes. For more information, you can also see all of the graphs, here. J.D.

Is this the new Hyundai Elantra?

Wed, Mar 11 2015

Hyundai's future models have a tendency to leak out of the South Korean market before they are shown elsewhere, and that appears to be the case with the next-gen Elantra. According to Indian Autos Blog, the official unveiling isn't scheduled in South Korea until April, but at least one shot of the upcoming sedan is online a few weeks early. Based on this single photo of the front of the car, Hyundai's designers are vastly altering the Elantra's styling for its latest generation, moving it closer to the current Sonata. The grille receives the wide, trapezoidal shape from the latest members of the brand's lineup, and the headlights wear a more angular look, as well. This image also barely shows an arching crease running up the side through the door handles. According to Indian Autos Blog, the powertrain range for the future Elantra might include the new 1.6-liter turbocharged, direct-injected four-cylinder from the recently unveiled Tucson. In European trim, the engine makes 174 horsepower and is paired with either a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission or a six-speed manual. If you're wondering why it's worth caring about a Korean-market Hyundai, it's because the automaker often only lightly tweaks designs (if at all) before bringing them to the US. So, this is quite likely an accurate preview of the next-gen Elantra in North America, as well.

Hyundai admits 'error' in KDM Sonata fuel economy announcement

Mon, Mar 17 2014

Stop us if you've heard this one before: Hyundai is going to have to reduce the officially announced miles-per-gallon number for its 2014 Sonata. While there's a lot of similarity between this new situation and events that transpired in 2012, there are some important differences. For one, the new mileage mistake, which Hyundai says was once again caused by an error at its test centers, is only applicable to cars in the Korean Domestic Market. Secondly, it's not so much mpg as kilometers per liter. "We are very sorry for causing confusion to reporters" - Hyundai According to Reuters, the numbers for the Korean Sonata were originally announced as 12.6 kilometers per liter (29.63 mpg), a six-percent increase over the previous model. The automaker has just announced that government verification showed an actual result of 12.1 kpl (28.46 mpg), which is only a two-percent increase. Since these numbers were done using the South Korean economy test, they are not equivalent to the US EPA numbers, the latter of which say the 2014 Sonata gets 36/40/38 miles per gallon. The correction came before the new Sonata went on sale in South Korea. In an official statement, Hyundai said, "We are very sorry for causing confusion to reporters." Hyundai Motor America's Jim Trainor, product public relations senior group manager, assured AutoblogGreen that the Korean error will have "no effect" on US ratings. In 2012, Hyundai and Kia faced a media and consumer firestorm after being caught up in exaggerated mileage claims for vehicles like its 2013 Accent, Veloster and Elantra. The sister companies agreed to compensate buyers to the tune of $395 million for what they said were "honest mistakes" and "human error" during in-house fuel economy tests. There is no word yet on whether similar customer satisfaction actions will follow this domestic market snafu.