Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Hummer H3 Awd on 2040-cars

Year:2007 Mileage:48896 Color: Red
Location:

7010 Maccorkle Ave, Saint Albans, West Virginia, United States

7010 Maccorkle Ave, Saint Albans, West Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.7L I5 20V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5GTDN13E778244720
Stock Num: 14W0090
Make: Hummer
Model: H3 AWD
Year: 2007
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Aluminum spare wheel rim
  • AM/FM/Satellite-capable Radio
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio system security
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary engine cooler
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Curb weight: 4,700 lbs.
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Head Room: 40.6"
  • Front Hip Room: 53.9"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.9"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 54.4"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 23.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 5,850 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.8 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 56 cu.ft.
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • OnStar
  • Overall height: 73.7"
  • Overall Length: 186.7"
  • Overall Width: 74.7"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Passenger vanity mirrors
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power steering
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear bench
  • Rear Head Room: 39.9"
  • Rear Hip Room: 53.5"
  • Rear Leg Room: 35.0"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 53.5"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Roof rails
  • Seatbe
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Outside rear
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Stability control
  • Suspension class: HD
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Torsion bar front spring
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
  • Wheelbase: 111.9"
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 48896

Our inventory is constantly changing daily, please make sure to call or email us to verify the vehicle of your choice as well as any listed options. -

Auto Services in West Virginia

Steve`s Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 1808 Main St E, Maplewood
Phone: (304) 465-5689

R & M Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3557 Berryville Pike, Summit-Point
Phone: (304) 725-3009

National Muffler Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems, Brake Repair
Address: 1320 7th St, Parkersburg
Phone: (304) 422-2642

Hurricane Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2354 US Route 60, Teays
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Hometown Subaru Kia ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: PO Box 64B, Mabscott
Phone: (304) 256-1060

Bill And Glenns Tire And Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2431 Valley Ave, Summit-Point
Phone: (540) 662-3480

Auto blog

2023 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Cupholder Mega Test: Will the Nalgene bottle fit?

Tue, May 2 2023

I absolutely adore the Hyundai Ioniq 5, and so was excited to spend a week with it when the EV landed in my driveway. When I first drove the Ioniq 5 in San Diego, though, I hadn't packed my favorite style water bottle: the big 32-ounce Nalgene. Despite it being the best, its sheer size makes it less ideal when trying to pack light for a short trip. It also means it doesn't fit in most cars' cupholders, but, without the bottle on hand, I'd have to wait until this new opportunity with the Ioniq 5 to find out if it passes the Nalgene check. So, let's get to it. Starting at pole position — the front cupholders — we find ourselves unlucky so far. It's not even close to fitting. Not unusual, but our first option for convenient access to megahydration is denied. In most instances, our next best bet is the molded pockets in the front door panels. Here we have success. It's quite a tight fit, so while our drink won't be knocking or rolling around, it's not as easy as it could be to retrieve while driving, and I'll probably eventually wear out the little plastic tether connecting the lid to the bottle, as that's the easiest thing to grab without looking. Still, I'll give these door holders a pass. How about the folks sitting in back? Where can they stash their Nalgenes? No surprise about it not fitting in the center armrest cupholders after our inauspicious start with the fronts. The fact that it won't fit in the door panels is disappointing. C'est la vie. But one more thing ... you might have noticed another potential stash up front in the storage cubby below the center stack. The Nalgene fits in there just fine, but a little bit of extra room means the bottle will be knocking around. It's actually a decent spot, and more accessible than the doors.

Best and Worst GM Cars

Thu, Apr 7 2022

Oh yes, because we just love receiving angry letters from devoted Pontiac Grand Am enthusiasts, we have decided to go there. Based on a heated group Slack conversation, the topic came up about the best and worst GM cars. First of all time, and then those currently on sale, and then just mostly a rambling discussion of Oldsmobiles our parents and grandparents owned (or engineered). Eventually, three of us made the video above. Like it? Maybe we can make more. Many awesome GM cars are definitely going unmentioned here, so please let us know your bests and worsts in the comments below. Mostly, it's important to note that this post largely exists as a vehicle for delivering the above video that dives far deeper into GM's greatest hits and biggest flops, specifically those from the 1980s and 1990s. What you'll find below is a collection of our editors identifying a best current and best-of-all-time choice, plus a worst current and worst-of-all-time choice. Comprehensive it is not, but again, comments. -Senior Editor James Riswick Best Current GM Vehicle Chevrolet Corvette We were flying by the seats of our pants a bit in this first outing and my notes were similarly extemporaneous. When it came time to tie it all together on camera, I failed spectacularly. Thank the maker for text, because this gives me the opportunity to perhaps slightly better explain my convoluted reasoning. I chose the C8 Corvette because it's simply overwhelmingly good, and it's merely the baseline from which this generation of Corvette will be expanded.  While the Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (more on that in a minute) is an amazing snapshot of GM's current performance standing and its little sibling so enraptured me that I went out and bought one, their existence is fleeting. Corvette will live on; forced-induction Cadillac sport sedans, not so much. So while all three are amazing machines when viewed in a vacuum, the Corvette stands above them as both a reflection of GM's current performance credentials and a signpost of what is to come. So, given the choice between the C8 and the 5V-Blackwing right now, I'd choose the C8. In 10 years, when the Blackwing is no longer in production and Corvette is in its 9th generation? Well, that might be a different story. Now, just pretend I said something even remotely that coherent when we get to the part of the video where I try to make an argument for the 5-V Blackwing as best GM car I've ever driven. Or just laugh at me while I ramble incoherently.

Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT

Tue, Feb 21 2023

When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.